- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: GA2020 Fraud - Fulton Co's defense attorneys just filed a motion to withdraw from the case
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:11 pm to Turbeauxdog
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:11 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
What does a software system company have to do with fraud in Georgia.
Seems a prudent step to rule out system deficiency, but that was not really the issue in Georgia
Trump paid these people to find fraud (two separate firms). They found no fraud and said his claims were not true.
1
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:14 pm to LSUCap
quote:
It’s classified documents from Space Force.
Now the topic is interesting.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:17 pm to ronricks
quote:Oh FFS!
A similar firm, Berkeley Research Group, was hired by the Trump campaign to investigate fraud claims. Like Simpatico, Berkeley did not find evidence of fraud or that the election was stolen.
10's of thousands of illegal votes were cast in Dane and Milwaukee Co's alone. That is not in dispute. The Courts simply refused to act. Asymmetrical ballot curing was rampant in PA. That is not in dispute. The Courts simply refused to act. Dozens of cases were raised in GA. The Courts simply refused to act base on false assertions of "No Standing." GA courts have only recently admitted they erred in those idiotic rulings. Etc., Etc., Etc., Etc.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:18 pm to ronricks
quote:
From a 2 minute google search. Article from late September that said they might have to withdraw over conflicts of interest, since some of their current or former clients might be called as witnesses for the prosecution.
Are you sure about that?
I see where a Notice of potential conflicts of interest was filed in the GA v. Trump, et al case, 23SC188947 but not in the present case.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:19 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Buckle up! It’s coming…
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:23 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Oh FFS!
10's of thousands of illegal votes were cast in Dane and Milwaukee Co's alone. That is not in dispute. The Courts simply refused to act. Asymmetrical ballot curing was rampant in PA. That is not in dispute. The Courts simply refused to act. Dozens of cases were raised in GA. The Courts simply refused to act base on false assertions of "No Standing." GA courts have only recently admitted they erred in those idiotic rulings. Etc., Etc., Etc., Etc.
In what year will Trump finally prove the election was stolen from him despite his many underlings already admitting it wasn't stolen from him? Do you think by 2030 Trump will have proven his case? You make it sound like it is so easy to prove why is Trump unable to do such? Its almost like it is a bunch of bullshite.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:24 pm to Havoc
quote:
I see where a Notice of potential conflicts of interest was filed in the GA v. Trump, et al case, 23SC188947 but not in the present case.
If Fulton County believes its own attorneys may be conflicted out, then there is no need for a motion. The attorneys just withdraw.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:26 pm to ronricks
The machines read and tabulate what is put in them. The machines don’t determine if what is fed in them is fraudulent or not. They simply showed the machines tallies were correct not if the votes they counted were fraudulent. It is a case of garbage in, garbage out.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:30 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
The total vote swing from 2016 to 2020 due to the change in % margin of victory in Georgia counties Trump won in 2016 was -113,059 (Trump lost GA by 11,800 in 2020).
I get that you rode the short bus to school
I understand that you never really applied yourself in school
I also comprehend that youre a moron
But to use actual vote counts to defend a fraudulent election is retarded. You get that right? Trump gained 12 MILLION mores votes in the rest of the US, but lost because of 113,000 in one state. The one state that you are now using to claim there was no voter fraud
Thats like saying UGA beat Bama last year with 3 penalties, but lost this year because UGA ended up with 14 penalties. YEAH, dumbass, thats the point. The extra 'penalties' made the difference. Trump only lost because they added votes to Biden that didnt exist. Not that people abandoned Trump. Heres proof (using your logic)
Trump GA 2016 - 2,089,104
Trump GA 2020 - 2,461,854
Thats 400K MORE VOTES, and still lost
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:30 pm to LSUCap
quote:
If you morons really think he didn’t have 2020 election monitored like crazy then you never paid attention.
Trump had the Admiral in charge of the NSA leave his post and drive to Trump Tower to personally tell POTUS-elect Trump his comms were being monitored. 100% all of these elections were being monitored. The morons don't understand that you don't go into Ruth's Chris and do the table-cloth trick on a ten-topper during the evening rush. You wait until coffee is served.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:31 pm to Bwmdx
quote:
The machines read and tabulate what is put in them. The machines don’t determine if what is fed in them is fraudulent or not. They simply showed the machines tallies were correct not if the votes they counted were fraudulent. It is a case of garbage in, garbage out.
They investigated various claims by Trump it was not just limited to machines. It was all a bunch of bullshite because Trump lost to essentially a corpse. He has to justify it somehow. Kinda like how he claimed it was 'rigged' when Ted Cruz beat him in the Iowa Caucus back in 2016
Its always fraud or someone else's fault with Trump when he loses. Its almost like there is a pattern here.
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 2:32 pm
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:32 pm to ronricks
quote:Their defense would have been based on what they could garner in two months of investigation opposed by billions of dollars and by any means necessary resistance. Investigations are ongoing. No one can say what will or won't be uncovered. I've already cited unconstitutional and undisputed instances in GA, WI, PA. Was there associated criminality in those instances? Almost assuredly. These defendants said what they were extorted to say in order to gain a plea settlement.
Powell, Giuliani, etc. have admitted their claims of fraud were not true.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:33 pm to NC_Tigah
That would be juicy if true.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:36 pm to ronricks
quote:
In what year will Trump finally prove the election was stolen
Do you deny:
10's of thousands of illegal votes were cast in Dane and Milwaukee Co's alone?
Do you deny:
Asymmetrical ballot curing was rampant in PA?
Do you deny:
GA courts have only recently admitted they erred in those idiotic "No Standing" rulings?
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:48 pm to ronricks
You seem ignorant
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:50 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
These defendants said what they were extorted to say in order to gain a plea settlement.
You realize they admitted these things weren't true well before the Georgia case was even a thing. Powell admitted such during Dominion Lawsuit discovery you know the one that forced Fox News to fork over nearly 800 million dollars and cost Tucker Carlson his job?
This post was edited on 11/10/23 at 2:52 pm
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:53 pm to Turbeauxdog
quote:
You seem ignorant
Ignorant is still believing clams from Donald Trump after his two handpicked investigative firms in which he forked over almost 2 million dollars to pay to investigate 'irregularities' in 2020 election said his claims were all bogus.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 3:00 pm to Havoc
quote:
Perhaps the theory is that they learned (if they didn’t know already) that their legal position is false and cannot be supported and thus very problematic to maintain the representation. Lawyers can lie a little to advocate for their client but not a lot if it is (or becomes as the evidence comes out) plainly obvious that it’s false.
that was my hunch. Looks we’re all on the same page. 
Posted on 11/10/23 at 3:16 pm to NC_Tigah
Those same two attorneys represent Ray Smith in the RICO case where there are also conflict of interest issues being raised.
I would guess this is a similar issue.
I would guess this is a similar issue.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 3:23 pm to ronricks
quote:
Ignorant is still believing clams from Donald Trump after his two handpicked investigative firms in which he forked over almost 2 million dollars to pay to investigate 'irregularities' in 2020 election said his claims were all bogus
Yep, definitely ignorant.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News