- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 11/10/23 at 12:53 pm to NC_Tigah
LOL. They are both conflicted out because they represent Defendants in Trump's RICO case.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 12:57 pm to GumboPot
quote:
So the ballots are going to be confirmed destroyed, then what?
Then there should be a targeted campaign against Kemp and Raffensberger for trying to hide this and questioning their involvement.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:05 pm to Havoc
quote:
Perhaps the theory is that they learned (if they didn’t know already) that their legal position is false and cannot be supported and thus very problematic to maintain the representation. Lawyers can lie a little to advocate for their client but not a lot if it is (or becomes as the evidence comes out) plainly obvious that it’s false.
This is the way I view it also. These law firms don't want to get too soiled so that it damages their reputations. Additionally, with the RICO charges against Trump, if the counties charging Trump destroy evidence, especially evidence directly involved with their case, then the court has toss the case. For people who have been these watching these GA election scenarios play out, evidence that Dekalb and Fulton counties were destroying ballots started way back in 2021. By law the ballots must be preserved. Now that the counties have to produce the ballots, their game is up and every dirty attorney who helped them is caught in the crossfire
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:21 pm to GumboPot
quote:
This most likely points to the attorneys found out that their client committed a crime so the have to either notify the court of the crime or stop representing them.
Would they not have to notify the court whether they withdraw or not?
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:25 pm to NC_Tigah
they are withdrawing over conflicts of interest since some of their current or former clients might be called as witnesses for the prosecution. This has nothing to do with 'evidence' 
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:27 pm to Wally Sparks
quote:
Why is Alex Wan (Atlanta City Councilman) a respondent?
I see him at the gym every morning I might ask him
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:35 pm to ronricks
quote:
they are withdrawing over conflicts of interest since some of their current or former clients might be called as witnesses for the prosecution. This has nothing to do with 'evidence'
WHere are you getting this info?
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:38 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
WHere are you getting this info?
From a 2 minute google search. Article from late September that said they might have to withdraw over conflicts of interest, since some of their current or former clients might be called as witnesses for the prosecution.
Trump has turned people into morons. He's had 3 years to provide evidence and proof and has come up with nothing because its all bullshite but low iq simps eat this stuff up.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:42 pm to Wally Sparks
quote:
Why is Alex Wan (Atlanta City Councilman) a respondent?
Read the footnote on the first page/image.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:45 pm to ronricks
quote:He has indeed. It's called TDS.
Trump has turned people into morons.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:49 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
GA2020 Fraud - Fulton Co's defense attorneys just filed a motion to withdraw from the case
Bringing RICO cases against Trump and a slew or other people was an extremely stupid thing for Georgia to do. If you're litigating the truth of Trump's statements then you have to give him access to any items that could prove his innocence.
Those items would disprove the idea that there was no fraud.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:51 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
A second firm hired by the Trump campaign to investigate fraud in the 2020 election said all of Trump’s fraud claims were false, the firm’s founder told The Washington Post
The Trump campaign hired Simpatico Software Systems and its founder, Ken Block, to investigate fraud claims all over the country after the 2020 election.
quote:
“No substantive voter fraud was uncovered in my investigations looking for it, nor was I able to confirm any of the outside claims of voter fraud that I was asked to look at,” he told the Post. “Every fraud claim I was asked to investigate was false.”
Block said he recently met with special counsel Jack Smith, the federal investigator into Trump’s efforts to overturn the 2020 election.
Campaign finance records show the campaign paid Block’s firm about $750,000, starting just days after the election.
A similar firm, Berkeley Research Group, was hired by the Trump campaign to investigate fraud claims. Like Simpatico, Berkeley did not find evidence of fraud or that the election was stolen.
LINK
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:54 pm to GBPackTigers
quote:
Nice retort
I think you did what is called "hitting the nail on the head".
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:54 pm to imjustafatkid
Hints as to why he has the evidence and has it in court with him. It’s classified documents from Space Force. If you morons really think he didn’t have 2020 election monitored like crazy then you never paid attention. Way before the 2020 election was even near to a decision he was saying they are gonna cheat and we know they will. He already knew what they were gonna do. Timing is everything.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:59 pm to imjustafatkid
quote:
Bringing RICO cases against Trump and a slew or other people was an extremely stupid thing for Georgia to do. If you're litigating the truth of Trump's statements then you have to give him access to any items that could prove his innocence.
Those items would disprove the idea that there was no fraud.
If there is 'evidence' then why are people like Powell etc all taking plea deals in Georgia and admitting that they lied about their claims? Why not use the trial to present the evidence?
Posted on 11/10/23 at 1:59 pm to ronricks
quote:
and has come up with nothing because its all bullshite but low iq simps eat this stuff up.
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:03 pm to ronricks
quote:Because there is a chance, however slight, that a case put in front of a jury with the combined IQ of a flatworm might return a guilty verdict. The pleas saved 6-to-7 digit legal expense outlays, years of stress, and guaranteed no jailtime.
If there is 'evidence' then why are people like Powell etc all taking plea deals in Georgia
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:07 pm to ronricks
What does a software system company have to do with fraud in Georgia.
Seems a prudent step to rule out system deficiency, but that was not really the issue in Georgia
Seems a prudent step to rule out system deficiency, but that was not really the issue in Georgia
Posted on 11/10/23 at 2:09 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Because there is a chance, however slight, that a case put in front of a jury with the combined IQ of a flatworm might return a guilty verdict. The pleas saved 6-to-7 digit legal expense outlays, years of stress, and guaranteed no jailtime.
Powell, Giuliani, etc. have admitted their claims of fraud were not true. Powell said no sane person would/should have thought or believed they were true. They lied and they are taking plea deals because they have no evidence. There isn't anything for them to present.
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News