- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Fulton County admits they did not follow the rules.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:28 pm to Vacherie Saint
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:28 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
And everything we were told turned out to be utter bullshite
This story is actually a great counter t this claim.
People are dishonestly framing this story as "turning out to be utter bullshite" (to use your words) when it isn't that at all.
Similar to the "CTs proven true" meme.
1
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:29 pm to Errerrerrwere
quote:
He knows he can't prove fraud rarely in a court of law.
He knows we can't prove it on Tigerdroppings.com.
But deep down in everyone's souls we know it happened. Including his.
This tracks with my "common sense is the crutch for those without facts or logic on their side" idiom.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:29 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Column A is a vote total that has concerns because they may not have started counting the votes at 0.
if that, then.. how do you trust the veracity of
quote:
Column B is a total of all the other measures in place to account for voting totals in the election.
???
You can't.
The whole thing was a mess.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:29 pm to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Right. It’s just a “clerical error”
Call it whatever you want. The error here involved the tabulation of the ballots, not the ballots themselves.
This current story is about early, in person voting. No one is claiming the votes themselves were improper. The tabulation of the votes were not properly authenticated.
Fortunately, in Georgia, the electronic voting machines produce a paper record that the voter double checks before putting that record in a secure box. Multiple hand recounts of the paper records have confirmed the Fulton County vote tabulation was accurate.
Potentially fraudulent mail in votes or whatever are not part of this current story.
No laws were broken, but the poll workers failed to follow proper procedure, and Fulton County is likely to face substantial fines.
But this particular story is not the election fraud bombshell people are hoping for.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
Throw out sense rely on pseudo legal dude!
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:30 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That comment was blahblahblahblah blahblahblah blahblahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah
blahblahblahblah blahblahblah blahblahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:33 pm to UncleFestersLegs
I was right. You cannot defend your position. Thank you for confirming. So that we don't have to do this exchange where you ultimately admit it
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:36 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
I was blahblahblahblah blahblahblah blahblahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah
blahblahblahblah blahblahblah blahblahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah blahblahblah blahblah
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:37 pm to SlowFlowPro
I’m not referring to this story in particular- just that I don’t trust people like you telling me this “clerical error” was an honest mistake, or the other stories pouring out of Georgia right now revealing jarring irregularities. Or their refusal to comply with federal law and disclose registration lists.
The same people who told me that the machines weren’t connected to the internet, or couldn’t be hacked, or that there was zero fraud, or that illegals didn’t vote, or that harvesting didn’t happen, or that 2020 was the most secure election in our history- are now telling me not to worry myself about these stories coming out of Georgia. They can kindly GF themselves.
The same people who told me that the machines weren’t connected to the internet, or couldn’t be hacked, or that there was zero fraud, or that illegals didn’t vote, or that harvesting didn’t happen, or that 2020 was the most secure election in our history- are now telling me not to worry myself about these stories coming out of Georgia. They can kindly GF themselves.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:38 pm to idlewatcher
quote:that's a good thing. If he was a lawyer attempting this he would have been disbarred first and then bankrupted so that he would have to plea to a handful of felony charges or find his family homeless.
a citizen investigator
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:39 pm to SlowFlowPro
Wow.
What a disingenuous dirtbag you are.
What a disingenuous dirtbag you are.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
Bottom line counselor. Fulton County CONFESSED to the very thing the Democrats, the media , the Georgia Secretary of State and just about everyone said didn't happen. Election Fraud.
It happened. Don't try to weasel out of it. They confessed. Now where else did it happen that most of the same entities claim it didn't?
It happened. Don't try to weasel out of it. They confessed. Now where else did it happen that most of the same entities claim it didn't?
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:41 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
That's not an entirely accurate way to describe things. The scanners zero reports weren't signed off on.
I'm not sure that is accurate and don't believe the distinction is important, as the tapes need to tie to the ballots that were scanned.
quote:
How, exactly? This added no votes for them. This took no votes from Republicans.
That's the problem, we don't know, which is why these votes should have never been certified.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:42 pm to I20goon
quote:
If he was a lawyer attempting this he would have been disbarred first and then bankrupted so that he would have to plea to a handful of felony charges or find his family homeless.
This is a perfect example of someone who listens to said lawyer on TV, and not what that same lawyer actually says in court when it matters.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:45 pm to SallysHuman
quote:
if that, then.. how do you trust the veracity of
quote:
You can't.
The thing is, you can, and that solves the problem of your first language.
There are multiple steps in the process that are recorded.
This tweet lays them out
quote:
In the 2020 election, Georgia used Dominion's ballot-marking touchscreen devices.
To vote in Georgia in 2020, you had to have been a registered voter.
Registered voters went to their assigned voting locations.
They checked-in using an "e-pollbook."
They showed identification to an election worker to confirm identity matches registered voter.
That voter is then "checked-in."
The number of check-ins was logged by each e-pollbook.
Those check-in logs are still available.
To vote, the voter selected his preferences on a touchscreen.
When done, the touchscreen printed a paper ballot with voter's choices.
The voter confirmed his choices and then took his paper ballot to a scanner (tabulator).
quote:
The tabulator scans the ballot, saves the results on its internal memory drive, and logs +1 for number of ballots cast.
At the beginning of the day, election workers run a "zero report."
This "zero report" prints a receipt-like paper that says how many ballots have been tabulated by the scanner.
At the end of the day, the election workers run a similar receipt report that says how many ballots the tabulator has tabulated.
During early voting, the receipt report from the close of the voting location the night before should match the "zero report" the next morning.
At the end of all voting, the memory drives were removed from the scanners/tabulators and then brought to central count for aggregation and results reporting.
George election rules -- NOT Georgia state statute -- mandate that those paper receipts and "zero reports" be signed by election workers.
Workers in Fulton County produced every single one of those receipts and "zero reports."
Those receipts and "zero reports" are still available.
They reconcile.
Like here in Louisiana, you have to sign before you vote. If there was ever a similar question, it can 100% be determined how many people signed-voted on that date, to see if there are any inaccuracies. Then the machines themselves have receipts that can also be used. etc.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:45 pm to antibarner
quote:
Fulton County CONFESSED to the very thing the Democrats, the media , the Georgia Secretary of State and just about everyone said didn't happen.
But, they didn't. That's the problem with tying this story into the CTs
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:47 pm to OceanMan
quote:
I'm not sure that is accurate
It is 100% accurate and the basis of the story.
quote:
That's the problem, we don't know
We do know. The # of votes was corroborated.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:53 pm to LawTalkingGuy
quote:
Fortunately, in Georgia, the electronic voting machines produce a paper record that the voter double checks before putting that record in a secure box. Multiple hand recounts of the paper records have confirmed the Fulton County vote tabulation was accurate.
What about this:
quote:
When Cross presented his findings to the SEB, even more irregularities came to light. “I tried to match it up, the opening and the closing [tapes] together, and I couldn’t find it,” said SEB Vice Chair Janice Johnston. “It’s not there. So, I go back to the report, and I read the report. And the investigator says, we asked for all of the opening and closing tapes, and the county reported back, ‘This is all they have,’ which is woefully incomplete.” Georgia’s election regulations require each polling location to produce two transcription tapes, one before polls open and the other after they close. The first tape verifies that the polling machines started at a ballot count of zero (meaning any data from a previous election or sample data from a test had been erased). The second tape includes the final count of ballots cast, as well as the tally of the votes. Georgia requires each tape to be certified by the signatures of three poll workers.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Due to the clerical error, Trump could have won GA. It would not have swung the election, though.
The point is that these irregularities happened in lots of states. It was the least secure election we’ve had in modern times.
Posted on 12/22/25 at 12:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Now do Loeffler-Warnock
Wasn't that decided in a different election in 2021?
Ok what about Perdue and Ossoff? If those 300,000 ballots are not counted in the primary election total Perdue gets > 50% so there is no runoff for Ossoff to win.
Page 9 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News