- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:14 am to RD Dawg
quote:
Because it would become a complete fiasco and I'm sure there are probably legal issues with dropping the entire hard drive.
How many underage girls are pictured in sexual acts?Ya think they can just "release" garbage like that?
Then cover their naughty bits and/or acts.
There is no different legal issue with releasing the information than there is sharing it privately with news organizations, especially when you're publicly touting that you are doing so.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:33 am to JawjaTigah
I lived through Watergate, and the media is different, but with longer time frame you have more press getting interested and competing for stories. The story needed more than one or two reporters, pundits talking about it. If that happens it forces more scrutiny. You really don’t know what you’re talking about on this type of scandal.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:35 am to Scruffy
quote:
Did she ever go look and apologize?
This is the question
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:39 am to Buckeye Jeaux
She’ll be fine, Rudy doesn’t have anything. I thought this board would have figured that out by now
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:40 am to Buckeye Jeaux
Sue the tits off her Rudy.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:42 am to Bard
quote:
Then cover their naughty bits and/or acts.
Oh,I'm sure that would work out perfectly. Are you freaking serious?
quote:
There is no different legal issue with releasing the information than there is sharing it privately with news organizations, especially when you're publicly touting that you are doing so.
Of course it is.Both organization s have layers of legal council going over this information and letting them know their liabilities.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:47 am to Buckeye Jeaux
quote:Which would be dismissed quickly likely with prejudice.
Kennedy will be looking at a defamation lawsuit.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:48 am to Buckeye Jeaux
Libertarians disgust me. I have been a member of that party since 1990 and they disgust me because the choice in this election is night and day.
Many voted for Gary Johnson in 2016 because they could not stand Hillary and were not sure what to expect from Trump. I was one of them. We now know that Trump has been a peace maker who keeps us out of war. Does that matter? What about cutting taxes? What about cutting regulations? Energy independence? Trump has been a pillar of steel against these climate change morons. Listen to Rand Paul!
Then there is Joe Biden the most statist person to every run for president. Joe wants federal mandates for wearing masks and has already stated he wants forced vaccinations when one is available. You look at the assaults on free speech and press coming from the left how can any libertarian support democrats?
Many voted for Gary Johnson in 2016 because they could not stand Hillary and were not sure what to expect from Trump. I was one of them. We now know that Trump has been a peace maker who keeps us out of war. Does that matter? What about cutting taxes? What about cutting regulations? Energy independence? Trump has been a pillar of steel against these climate change morons. Listen to Rand Paul!
Then there is Joe Biden the most statist person to every run for president. Joe wants federal mandates for wearing masks and has already stated he wants forced vaccinations when one is available. You look at the assaults on free speech and press coming from the left how can any libertarian support democrats?
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:50 am to buckeye_vol
You are a lawyer too? Wow.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:51 am to roadGator
quote:Doesn’t take a lawyer to know this.
You are a lawyer too? Wow.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:53 am to buckeye_vol
Oh. My bad thought you had a JD too.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:54 am to Tactical1
quote:
She’ll be fine, Rudy doesn’t have anything. I thought this board would have figured that out by now
So why are libtards so afraid then? They have completely blacked out this issue from the news and suppressed speech and press to keep Americans from knowing about it.
This is not a mysterious thing and it was already known. Hunter's million dollar a year no show job with Burisma is indisputable. He admitted it. We have Biden on video bragging about holding up aid to get a local prosecutor fired who was investigating Burisma. We have that photo of Hunter, Devon Archer and Joe with a Burisma exec which proves Biden did involve himself in Hunter's business dealings.
They tried to impeach Trump for a phone call but Biden's corruption is nothing? Bullcrap!
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:57 am to Buckeye Jeaux
Wow, when did this happen?
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:58 am to ChineseBandit58
quote:
She has a vagina; eventually they all go bat shite and go full retard
You do realize there are rational, conservative women on this forum right?
Posted on 10/29/20 at 11:58 am to tide06
Notice how quick she shut up when he mentioned defamation. She realized she stepped in it at that point. She really did defame him with zero evidence and Rudy was not have it. Good for him...
Posted on 10/29/20 at 12:06 pm to RD Dawg
quote:
Oh,I'm sure that would work out perfectly. Are you freaking serious?
You mean like the picture already circulating with Hunter standing there wearing only an open robe and Natalie (with a black strip over her face) in the bed in the background?
quote:
Of course it is.
No, it's not. The data on the laptop belongs to the shop owner, he gave a copy to Rudy to do with as he wishes. That copy now belongs to Rudy to do with as he pleases.
If there were any conceivable legal grounds for charges to keep this stuff from coming out, they would have already been filed.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 12:09 pm to buckeye_vol
quote:
Which would be dismissed quickly
The courtroom is Rudy's briar patch. She might get out of it but not before going through a hellish experience.
Posted on 10/29/20 at 12:23 pm to Bard
quote:
You mean like the picture already circulating with Hunter standing there wearing only an open robe and Natalie (with a black strip over her face) in the bed in the background?
There are pictures FAR worse than that.I can assure you and probably LOADS of personal information regarding the Biden family.You cannot arbitrarily release that information.
quote:
If there were any conceivable legal grounds for charges to keep this stuff from coming out, they would have already been filed.
I'm referring to legal issues releasing to the public.
You think Rudy is releasing tidbits for his ego or attention?
Don't ya think he wants Trump to win?
Popular
Back to top
