Started By
Message

re: Four members of Army Reserve identified as those killed in action during Epic Fury

Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:47 pm to
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:47 pm to
quote:

The unit they were assigned to is an Expeditionary Sustainment Command. There's only 9 in the entire Army and just 3 of them are Active Duty.


Thanks for the info.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:51 pm to
quote:

he retard we be surprised by the Percentage of refueling tankers ran by the guard and reserve versus the Active Duty.


I probably would be and I am not going to run to wiki to look it up, doing other stuff tonight. But I am still wondering why it isn't more active duty doing it. It almost seems like something that was meant to be a "break glass in case of emergency" thing has become a "use at will, as you wish". To me that seems odd, but maybe there are reasons (more experienced people in the guard perhaps?). I dunno.

Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90765 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:52 pm to
One more time Corky

Your assumption is from the 70s.

Total Force is confusing to you
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:56 pm to
Just heard about it from you for the first time, looked it up and now I understand (that it is all considered one thing, not a "reserve"). Thank you.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:57 pm to
quote:

I probably would be and I am not going to run to wiki to look it up, doing other stuff tonight. But I am still wondering why it isn't more active duty doing it. It almost seems like something that was meant to be a "break glass in case of emergency" thing has become a "use at will, as you wish". To me that seems odd, but maybe there are reasons (more experienced people in the guard perhaps?). I dunno.


The guard and reserve used to be a “break glass in case war” force but since 9-11 they’ve been used extensively. Even though the major wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are over they still deploy quite a bit(I think it’s mostly on a volunteer basis). I don’t know for certain but I imagine it’s to keep the skills in the reserve component at least somewhat honed.

I imagine units like “expeditionary support command” are mostly administrative in nature meaning they don’t require a highly skilled warrior or much specialized training so why waste time training a full time soldier to do it when you can get a national guard volunteer who doesn’t mind going to Kuwait to push some paper around and get away from his nagging wife and the 9-5 grind of civilian life for a few months.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
28173 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:58 pm to
quote:

To me that seems odd, but maybe there are reasons (more experienced people in the guard perhaps?). I dunno.


That is a benefit, as is exercising all the systems that have to work for a deployment.

The other part is that logistics wins wars, but we don't need that much during peace time. We generally train close to home and don't need big supply chains. It makes sense to have a lot of those functions; airlift, fuel transport, etc as a part of the Reserves.

Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 7:59 pm to
But - again I am trying to learn here - isn't the guard a state level thing? The New York Guard. The Texas Guard. If they sign on they can "volunteer" okay I get that, but can they do the opposite and say "thanks but no thanks"? (Note I certainly presume not, but who knows, like I said, I am in learning mode).
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:00 pm to
quote:

The other part is that logistics wins wars, but we don't need that much during peace time. We generally train close to home and don't need big supply chains. It makes sense to have a lot of those functions; airlift, fuel transport, etc as a part of the Reserves.


That makes a lot of sense as well. Thank you.
Posted by BOHICAMAN
Member since Feb 2026
1159 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

But - again I am trying to learn here - isn't the guard a state level thing?


Not really but kinda. They are trained and funded by the US Army or the US Air Force. The governor can use them for state missions at his discretion for the most part using state funds. They can also be activated by the president for federal missions.

In this case the big army probably sent a message to the “expeditionary support command” unit of whatever state these guys were from(or multiple states) and said “We need X number of guys to deploy to Kuwait for Y number of months. The unit then asks all their guys who wants to go.
This post was edited on 3/3/26 at 8:06 pm
Posted by roguetiger15
Member since Jan 2013
17565 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:05 pm to
Is there anymore details on what happen exactly?

RIP heroes. We are forever in your debt.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:07 pm to
Was not aware of this :"dual loyalty". thank you bohicaman, its now making much more sense.



Posted by Murph4HOF
A-T-L-A-N-T-A (that's where I stay)
Member since Sep 2019
18962 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:09 pm to
quote:

I imagine units like “expeditionary support command” are mostly administrative in nature meaning they don’t require a highly skilled warrior 
This is coming from a guy whose knowledge of logistics and supply are 1) be nice the the Supply SGT, 2) SLANTREPs are due daily, and 3) Equipment adrift is a gift but had to do some exercises attached to ESCs and TSCs:

They are highly specialized units. SPO shops are more black magic than Voodoo spaghetti on Halloween in Jamaica. The logistics they figure out using Just In Time logistics from across the entire world is shite I can't comprehend, but they make it happen. The Army is responsible for logistical support for the entire force, not just the Army, and the ESCs and TSCs are the units responsible for that success.

While a Support Battalion might be worried about IEDs on an MSR or ASR, ESCs and TSCs are worried about the Strait of Hormuz being closed, the Montreux Convention being invoked, or a ship blocking the Suez Canal then finding ways to get the bullets and beans to the Joes despite that.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127400 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:11 pm to
quote:

Is there anymore details on what happen exactly?
US Army Captain from Florida among soldiers killed during 'Operation Epic Fury'

From the article;

The soldiers "died on March 1, 2026, in Port Shuaiba, Kuwait, during an unmanned aircraft system attack. All Soldiers were assigned to the 103rd Sustainment Command, Des Moines, Iowa. The incident is under investigation," according to DoW's statement.

Captain Khork was a close friend of my nephew. They had deployed to Guantanamo Bay together several years ago.
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90765 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:14 pm to
Times have changed.

Some missions are 100 percent Guard and Reserve.
This post was edited on 3/3/26 at 8:17 pm
Posted by 3nOut
I don't really care, Margaret
Member since Jan 2013
32398 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:16 pm to
Don’t agree with every reason why you were there but thank you patriots.

I hope the ME is more stable because of your sacrifice.

Posted by Clark14
Earth
Member since Dec 2014
27162 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

The guard and reserve used to be a “break glass in case war” force but since 9-11 they’ve been used extensively. Even though the major wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are over they still deploy quite a bit(I think it’s mostly on a volunteer basis). I don’t know for certain but I imagine it’s to keep the skills in the reserve component at least somewhat honed.


It’s widely thought that Dubya Bush joined the air national guard to avoid the draft and a Vietnam deployment, but he denied that. It really aggravated me that he used the guard to avoid going to war but used the guard to fight his war. I’d never seen them deployed in that big of a manner.

My condolences to the families of those who lost their lives.
This post was edited on 3/3/26 at 8:20 pm
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:23 pm to
quote:

Times have changed. Some missions are 100 percent Guard and Reserve.


Well until now, I did not know that. Once again, thank you for giving me information that I will pass on to him.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:25 pm to
quote:

Times have changed. Some missions are 100 percent Guard and Reserve.


May God bless him and his family and loved one's. A hero.
Posted by Eurocat
Member since Apr 2004
17244 posts
Posted on 3/3/26 at 8:27 pm to
BTW Jbird, when you say reserve, do you mean Army reserve or what I think is called IRR? Or are they one and then same? Thanks in advance.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
127400 posts
Posted on 3/4/26 at 4:36 am to
quote:

Why is Army Reserve involved at this state of the war?
They are doing what they have done since 1908. Serving as a part of the Total Force.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram