- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "flock" camera outrage, is it really ngos fighting deportations?
Posted on 8/22/26 at 5:26 pm to theunknownknight
Posted on 8/22/26 at 5:26 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
If the globalist bankers decided to move capital out of the USA
Posted on 8/22/26 at 5:28 pm to theunknownknight
quote:
It’s not the current “AI” that’s the danger. It is just a tool that is reaching its functional limits. The real danger is quantum computing.
You really are that stupid, its a tool (kind of like you) that can be used to help us achieve quantum computing.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 5:40 pm to theunknownknight
Simple math in the corporate world. If you can borrow money at a lower rate than you believe you can make it......borrow it and use someone else's money.
Alphabet issued bonds at 6.98% their shares have increased the last five years on average at 30% thats 23% upside......they should issue more bonds
Alphabet issued bonds at 6.98% their shares have increased the last five years on average at 30% thats 23% upside......they should issue more bonds
Posted on 8/22/26 at 5:42 pm to Crimsonmarine
Which means more illegals are being nabbed and hence the ngos increasing their rhetoric.
I think many are confusing the chicken with the egg here.
I think many are confusing the chicken with the egg here.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 5:42 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
The key distinction is whether the surveillance is justified and proportionate, not whether it is applied equally.
Equal treatment and justified treatment are two separate questions.
Yeah, that's called a warrant.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 6:00 pm to lsuguy84
quote:
You really are a dumbass sometimes, but I like you.
Ya learnin pardna. Now explain to me why they cut down all the live oaks in your area to "enhance" it. Real disappointed the last time I was up there.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:44 pm to trinidadtiger
You must be one of these policemen using flock cameras to track your ex
Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:49 pm to meansonny
quote:
On public roads? What law prevents people from watching you in public?
In Tenneseee the Stalking and Aggravated Stalking statutes would prevent someone from doing this.
quote:
Free speech, free press, and free association disagree with your assertions. It is exactly the reason why you have a license plate
A license plate doesn’t create a database that constantly tracks your movements. Again, the closest example in current use is GPS which always requires a warrant.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 7:54 pm to Boom33
quote:
Yeah, that's called a warrant.
A warrant isn’t really the dividing line I’m talking about. If a Flock camera is simply recording license plates and vehicles as they pass through a public area, I don’t think a warrant should be necessary for every photograph. If the government is using cameras to peer into someone’s home or otherwise monitor activity in a place where there’s a reasonable expectation of privacy, that’s where the Fourth Amendment analysis becomes very different.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 9:20 pm to trinidadtiger
quote:
Which means more illegals are being nabbed and hence the ngos increasing their rhetoric.
I don't know about the NGO rhetoric, but ICE apprehensions have gone steadily down since peaking in January this year, despite the over 100% increase in flock cameras deployment during the same time period...
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:52 pm to Willie Stroker
quote:
A warrant isn’t really the dividing line I’m talking about. If a Flock camera is simply recording license plates and vehicles as they pass through a public area, I don’t think a warrant should be necessary for every photograph. If the government is using cameras to peer into someone’s home or otherwise monitor activity in a place where there’s a reasonable expectation of privacy, that’s where the Fourth Amendment analysis becomes very different.
By doing that on every car you are assuming every person is guilty until proven innocent.
And the proof of that is that every one that seems to be in favor tries to justify it by claiming it will catch more criminals.
AKA if you treat people as guilty until proven innocent, you will catch more criminals.
If you set up roadblocks everywhere and make people show their papers, you will catch more criminals. That is what these are equivalent too.
But this time it's different!
A warrant as you previously said requires a justification for the check. It's the entire purpose of the 4th amendment. That you cannot treat people as being guilty until proven innocent, you need to at least establish a reason for the warrant.
Monitoring a specific building or whatever for security is a little more understandable than monitoring the entire population everywhere.
Furthermore, it's possible that some of these cases that are using flock could eventually get thrown out due to 4th amendment violations as well. Similar to a cop pulling someone over without a reason. They'll have to be challenged, but it's not a weak case depending on the role of flock.
Posted on 8/22/26 at 11:54 pm to Crimsonmarine
quote:
I don't know about the NGO rhetoric, but ICE apprehensions have gone steadily down since peaking in January this year, despite the over 100% increase in flock cameras deployment during the same time period...
Probably because license plates don't change just because an illegal gets into the car to indicate it.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 12:01 am to Boom33
For someone so concerned about data collection, it’s interesting you would use the internet, where literally all of your data is collected, sold, and sometimes hacked.
Posted on 8/23/26 at 1:14 am to Riverside
quote:
For someone so concerned about data collection, it’s interesting you would use the internet, where literally all of your data is collected, sold, and sometimes hacked.
I buy and sell information on the internet.
I'm not the government.
I'm also required by law to get consent from the user to do so.
This post was edited on 8/23/26 at 1:29 am
Posted on 8/23/26 at 1:54 am to trinidadtiger
Is that you Peter? How have you been? How is Satan and all his demons? I haven’t talked to them in a while. Oh well best of luck with your antichrist scheme. ??
Popular
Back to top

0






