- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: first it was Global Warming. then it was Climate Change.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:29 pm to Dale51
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:29 pm to Dale51
I don't maybe every single graph that shows the drastic increase in average yearly temperature that started with the industrial revolution.
The one that has been posted on this board, to you, numerous times that you have committed, rather impressively mind you, Mental gymnastics to find any way to discredit.
The one that has been posted on this board, to you, numerous times that you have committed, rather impressively mind you, Mental gymnastics to find any way to discredit.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:32 pm to tiger7166
Fear controls people. It’s a simple formula.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 12:37 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
I don't maybe every single graph that shows the drastic increase in average yearly temperature that started with the industrial revolution.
What chart do you believe 1999 NASA or 2016 NASA?
The data is fake and they've be caught.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:13 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
I don't maybe every single graph that shows the drastic increase in average yearly temperature that started with the industrial revolution.
Graphs??
That said, "since the industrial revolution"?? Thats a kind of short timeframe to measure anything the span of weather/climate cycles isn't it??
Where do terms like a "100 year storm" or "500 year flood" etc, come from?
You people!
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:31 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
I don't maybe every single graph that shows the drastic
Graphs are based on data. In other words: garbage in, garbage out.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 1:37 pm to gizmoflak
quote:WRONG. Before global warming there was global cooling.
first it was Global Warming. then it was Climate Change.
Posted on 10/30/19 at 8:20 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
TIMMY
Shut Up Timmy
Posted on 11/29/19 at 2:46 pm to gizmoflak
Nobody saw this coming

quote:
Climate change alarmists are pushing for a change in vocabulary to scare people into taking global warming more seriously, starting with terms like “global meltdown” and “climate collapse.”
Writing for AdAge this week, Aaron Hall argues that in order to get people to “take action” against climate change, “rebranding” is crucial, since people have gotten too used to the idea that climate is changing and need to be shocked into the notion that the world as we know it is ending.
Posted on 11/29/19 at 2:54 pm to RockyMtnTigerWDE
quote:
Global cooling was first
Hole in the ozone layer from excess Aquanet hair spray use was in there somewhere.
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:04 pm to gizmoflak
It isn’t mankind doing it
It is white people
It is white people
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:10 pm to davyjones
quote:
Hole in the ozone layer from excess Aquanet hair spray use was in there somewhere.
Well, that's just sexist. You left out men's Arid Extra Dry.
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:14 pm to xxTIMMYxx
quote:
People who adamantly deny it are just as bad as the people say it is an indisputable fact. Better to be prepared than to be caught with your pants down.
This is nonsense.
You may not believe in vampires, but its better to wear a garlic necklace and be prepared than to be caught with your collar down.
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:19 pm to Dale51
quote:
You may not believe in vampires, but its better to wear a garlic necklace and be prepared than to be caught with your collar down.
That's a perfect analogy. In argumentation theory the left is using 'presumption shift'. IE, if you don't know what to do, do something. It's a stupid idea.
There is a 1 in a billion chance that the earth will be destroyed by a killer asteroid in the next 100,000 years. So, it is safer to ACT NOW. To set up anti-asteroid destruction stations.
That's why you always see the left argument with the warning 'Must Act Now.'
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:31 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
Just ignore the fact that ignorant statements like this show you are agenda driven and will not change you stance no matter the overwhelming evidence in front of you.
You're projecting again.
Just what does this "overwhelming evidence" consist of??
Be specific.
Thanks.
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:32 pm to gizmoflak
CBS Earth Day - 1970
According to Walter Cronkite in 1970, planet Earth was in big trouble. He urged us to "act or die".
According to Walter Cronkite in 1970, planet Earth was in big trouble. He urged us to "act or die".
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:32 pm to gizmoflak
(no message)
This post was edited on 11/29/19 at 3:33 pm
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:33 pm to Dale51
they are onto Climate Injustice right now since the climate is a racist meany that affect poor and minorities more than rich people
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:35 pm to gizmoflak
quote:
first it was Global Warming
Nope. First we were going into another ice age!
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:37 pm to mindbreaker
quote:
I don't maybe every single graph that shows the drastic increase in average yearly temperature that started with the industrial revolution.
And? The temperature goes up..the temperature goes down. Its a natural cycle with zero evidence to indicate it is out of the norm.
Do you have any evidence that suggests it is beyond any past normal cycle??
*"graph"*
you people!
This post was edited on 11/29/19 at 8:40 pm
Posted on 11/29/19 at 3:44 pm to gizmoflak
quote:
Writing for AdAge this week, Aaron Hall argues that in order to get people to “take action” against climate change, “rebranding” is crucial
Kinda like dropping quid pro quo for a field tested "bribery" claim.
These people!
Back to top


4







