Started By
Message

re: Federal Judge says Twitter is a PUBLIC FORUM....LOLOLOL

Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:27 pm to
Posted by Fireman17
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2010
12343 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:27 pm to
Next FB will be ruled as a public forum mark it down..
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:28 pm to
Buchwald
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
50742 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

If they're a "public forum" then how the frick can they decide who gets to talk and who doesn't?




Twitter, as a whole, is not a public forum. Trump, by using his twitter account as a forum for Presidential communication, created a public forum specific to his account.

Also, it should be noted that the ruling did not come with an injunction requiring Trump to unblock users. Instead it was “declaratory relief”.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:30 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure that decision was specific to government entities on Twitter IIRC.


When tweeting during personal time, how are his tweets part of a public entity?
Posted by bamarep
Member since Nov 2013
52559 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:31 pm to
quote:


Twitter, as a whole, is not a public forum.


The judge says otherwise. They can't have their cake and eat it too.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:32 pm to
quote:


Yes, but that judge ruled he uses his personal one for POTUS business.


Did she provide examples to substantiate that ridiculous claim?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

When tweeting during personal time, how are his tweets part of a public entity?


But he mixes personal and governmental business on his personal account. That's the premise for the ruling.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

Did she provide examples to substantiate that ridiculous claim?


It was a pretty hit topic here when it happened a few months ago. I'd imagine there were examples.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:35 pm to
quote:

The judge says otherwise. They can't have their cake and eat it too.


The judge did not say otherwise actually. The snippet in the OP is intentionally misleading.
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
50742 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

The judge says otherwise.


No.

She didn't.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:36 pm to
quote:

Twitter can do as they please, but government entities on Twitter cannot.


So any government "entity" cannot block anyone on Twitter?
Posted by Tridentds
Sugar Land
Member since Aug 2011
23938 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:36 pm to
This actually has a lot more repercussions for Twitter than anyone else... including Trump.
This post was edited on 8/6/18 at 6:12 pm
Posted by Green Chili Tiger
Lurking the Tin Foil Hat Board
Member since Jul 2009
50742 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

So any government "entity" cannot block anyone on Twitter?


Trump hasn't unblocked anyone.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:38 pm to
quote:

But he mixes personal and governmental business on his personal account.


So he can block anyone when not referring to "government business"?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
91838 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:39 pm to
quote:

So he can block anyone when not referring to "government business"?


Is he never going to use it for governmental business again?
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
98011 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Twitter, as a whole, is not a public forum.


Why does this judge disagree?
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:40 pm to
quote:

Trump hasn't unblocked anyone.

I wasn't referring to Trump.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138874 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:42 pm to
Seems like Alex Jones could use that ruling to his advantage on FB and YouTube.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:42 pm to
quote:


Is he never going to use it for governmental business again?


I don't understand what your point is supposed to be.
Posted by UpToPar
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
22970 posts
Posted on 8/6/18 at 5:43 pm to
quote:

They ruled that Trump can decide who gets to see his tweets and who cannot. Twitter can do as they please, but government entities on Twitter cannot.


Why is this any different than Trump restricting the people in attendance at his speaking engagements?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram