Started By
Message

FDA approves new mRNA vaccine

Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:52 am
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45963 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:52 am
quote:

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved a new seasonal flu vaccine from Moderna that uses mRNA technology, the drugmaker announced Wednesday.

Called mFLUSIVA, it is approved for adults ages 50 and older. It's the first influenza vaccine using mRNA technology to receive FDA approval.

The approval "reflects the ongoing potential of our mRNA platform to help address important public health challenges through continued scientific innovation," Moderna said in a statement. "We are grateful to the clinical trial participants, investigators, regulators and Moderna teams whose contributions made this milestone possible."
LINK

Well this should be fun to discuss.
Posted by TDsngumbo
Member since Oct 2011
51528 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:54 am to
I so rarely get the flu shot to begin with, but if they're now using mRNA medicine in the flu shot, I've had my last flu vaccine.
Posted by Longdriver98
Alpharetta, GA
Member since Nov 2005
3683 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:54 am to
My response is NFW
Posted by LSU Patrick
Member since Jan 2009
78214 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:54 am to
Good to see that we are learning from mistakes.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
116934 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:56 am to
frick that
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
24724 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Called mFLUSIVA, it is approved for adults ages 50 and older.


The next meeting will approve for adults younger than 50 with comorbidities, the following meeting will approve for all adults and certain children with comorbidities, then the next will recommend for all individuals 6mo and older.

Like clockwork.
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
110549 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:58 am to
How long until it is required to be given in utero to any unaborted fetuses?
Posted by HubbaBubba
North of DFW, TX
Member since Oct 2010
52556 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:59 am to
Thankfully, nobody has to take it and I, for one, will advise my doctor that I will not take an mRNA vaccine.

I asked if they are the only company making a vaccine.

This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 11:00 am
Posted by Cotten
Tennessee
Member since Jan 2018
1869 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 10:59 am to
quote:

The next meeting will approve for adults younger than 50 with comorbidities, the following meeting will approve for all adults and certain children with comorbidities, then the next will recommend for all individuals 6mo and older. Like clockwork.

Eh, you missed the “this is now required or you lose your job” step as well as the “the shot was completely ineffective and we all knew it the whole time” step that comes a few years later.
Posted by keks tadpole
Yellow Leaf Creek
Member since Feb 2017
8849 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:00 am to
No thanks. I’ll take my chances
Posted by TBPland
League City, TX
Member since Sep 2009
1581 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:05 am to
Just when all the covid crap is back in the daylight here they come again. If Bill Gates is on this side of the green grass I am skeptical of anything medical. It's a sad state when the "smart people" want to decrease humanity thinking they will live forever and keep all the riches they have.
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45963 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:06 am to
quote:


I so rarely get the flu shot to begin with, but if they're now using mRNA medicine in the flu shot, I've had my last flu vaccine.


This post is not advocating for or against the getting the flu shot in the future. However, if circumstances in the future do make you inclined to get the flu shot then you can ask for the non mRNA one.
Posted by KLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
11197 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:12 am to
quote:

FDA approves new mRNA vaccine


I can already here it:

quote:

I know you still got sick after the vaccine but if you hadn't taken it you would have been more sick maybe died!


This one always got me as there is no way to prove this one way or the other.
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 1:53 pm
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
16339 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:13 am to
quote:

Good to see that we are learning from mistakes


It depends on your perspective.

From a Big Pharma CEO perspective, as well as an FDA official that approves this type of shite and then eventually will find his way onto a Big Pharma Executive board, it is absolutely a huge win for those few individuals, mankind and the truth be damned.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
24724 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:13 am to
quote:

However, if circumstances in the future do make you inclined to get the flu shot then you can ask for the non mRNA one.


They will all but discontinue "traditional" vaccines in classes where mRNA takes over. mRNA is supposedly a faster, more readily adaptable platform that will outweigh its clunky counterparts in both cost and scale.

For awhile you will have a choice... but not forever.
Posted by paperwasp
2x HRV 2025 Poster of the Year
Member since Sep 2014
30762 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:18 am to
quote:

the shot was completely ineffective

I'm pretty sure the flu shot is almost always ineffective.

"Whoops, turns out we really boofed those virus strains this year."

"Here, take this prescription for Tamiflu so your symptoms can reduce by about one day."
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18414 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:24 am to
Ain’t had a flu shot in 11yrs, never had the fluSo that will be a hard pass for me. No thank you
This post was edited on 8/8/26 at 9:18 am
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
27437 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:27 am to
If they are using mRNA like the Covid shots where it forces our cells to make the parts that trigger an immune response, that's a serious no go.

If they use mRNA as a manufacturing process outside of our bodies, that's a different story. NVax used mRNA on moth cells to make the covid spikes and harvested them rather than coopting our own body cells.
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 12:45 pm
Posted by Ailsa
Member since May 2020
11583 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Moderna


Fauci is heavily invested it moderna...the same company that produced one of the covid jabs.

For 2 million dollars, the FDA will approve any drug.

quote:

Supreme Court: Pfizer, Moderna et al. may own your genes once you're injected with their lab-created mRNA, DNA

“The Supreme Court ruled that if there is anything synthetic, not from nature, inside of our genome, then whoever owns the patent on those synthetic parts now owns part or all of you as a human. That means Bill and Melinda Gates et al., The Department of Defense, et al. can literally own a human being. If this synthetic code is taken up into your genome, by law, you could be owned overnight.”

The case that provides the blueprint for pharmaceutical companies claiming ownership of your genes is Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc., 569 U.S. 576 (2013). This case originated from a Utah-based company called Myriad Genetics.


https://thecovidblog.com/2021/04/27/supreme-court-pfizer-moderna-et-al-may-own-your-genes-once-youre-injected-with-their-lab-created-mrna-dna/
https://archive.is/5GMIk
This post was edited on 8/6/26 at 11:28 am
Posted by WeeWee
Member since Aug 2012
45963 posts
Posted on 8/6/26 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Ain’t had a clue shite in 11yr never had the fflu. So that will be a hard pass for me. No thank you


quote:

ole man


first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram