- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: FBI took everything from Micheal Cohen's office & home and the Set-up of Michael Cohen
Posted on 4/16/18 at 5:40 pm to MrLSU
Posted on 4/16/18 at 5:40 pm to MrLSU
Anything taken on these raids is gonna face some serious scrutiny re admissibility if anything from it ever goes criminal.
Even if the sealed affidavit is solid, there will still be questions to be answered regarding what was taken.
The raids were either a swing for the fences or the new norm we should just get used to.
I still feel like people don’t get how crazy the raids were.
Even if the sealed affidavit is solid, there will still be questions to be answered regarding what was taken.
The raids were either a swing for the fences or the new norm we should just get used to.
I still feel like people don’t get how crazy the raids were.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 5:49 pm to upgrayedd
We ALL lose when they use this kind of third world tactics. Way out of bounds of client/attorney. They sure didn't send in the storm troopers when Hilary was under investigation. Her lawyers had plenty of time to go through her documents and decide which ones they would get and which ones they would destroy.
Sad the lengths they will go to try and destroy Trump and anyone close to him.
Sad the lengths they will go to try and destroy Trump and anyone close to him.
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 5:51 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 5:50 pm to Scoop
quote:
I still feel like people don’t get how crazy the raids were.
1000% regardless of whether you like Cohen or not. The dangerous road this leads to is unending and a dangerously slippery slope.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 5:52 pm to Scoop
quote:
The raids were either a swing for the fences or the new norm we should just get used to.
Its for the leaks that will drip for the next few years so Juice and ilk can post about them.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 5:53 pm to goatmilker
Trump needs to tweet that he's asking the DOJ to consider raiding Hillary's lawyer's offices due to the (insert any number of allegations).
Just to watch the about face.
Just to watch the about face.
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 5:56 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 5:58 pm to Scoop
quote:
Anything taken on these raids is gonna face some serious scrutiny re admissibility if anything from it ever goes criminal.
I am firmly in the trump sucks camp, but I agree. This search should be challenged if charges arise due to it. I suspect the feds did this by the book though. This case has so much scrutiny that one would think that Robert Khuzami made it airtight.
It will still be challenged though.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 6:51 pm to NC_Tigah
Well, Cohen had ten clients.
Cohen said that he was only a business consultant, not a lawyer, for seven of them.
Can you do that math for me?
Cohen said that he was only a business consultant, not a lawyer, for seven of them.
Can you do that math for me?
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 6:53 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 6:53 pm to MrLSU
Avenatti is a very good lawyer.
He has beat(settled) Trump before. Trump hates losing and Avenatti probably pisses him off more than Stormy.
He has beat(settled) Trump before. Trump hates losing and Avenatti probably pisses him off more than Stormy.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:02 pm to brian_wilson
quote:
I am firmly in the trump sucks camp
Yes. We know. We heard you the first 600x or so.
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 7:03 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:04 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
quote: He also has the crime/fraud exception to contend with.
Based on what?
If someone instructed Cohen to pay off Stormy for the campaign, that is not privileged. The communication furthers the crime.
If Cohen communicated back about how to cover up the illegal contribution, I’m pretty sure that isn’t privileged either.
Rule 1.6 is pretty clear IIRC.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:13 pm to JudgeHolden
Paying off stormy is an illegal contribution? if if if
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality Of Information. (a) A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation or the disclosure is permitted by paragraph (b).
Rule 1.6 Confidentiality Of Information. (a) A lawyer shall not reveal information relating to the representation of a client unless the client gives informed consent, the disclosure is impliedly authorized in order to carry out the representation or the disclosure is permitted by paragraph (b).
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 7:18 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:33 pm to themunch
quote:
themunch
Keep reading, Vladimir. It’s section (b)(2).
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:34 pm to JudgeHolden
The only Red meat I see in here is YOU.
This the part you concern yourself with. It still shows the lawyer as a protector not an active participant in some criminal activity yet to be determined by undermining the very essence of this rule that has been on full display by our Dictatorial Justice Department.
quote:
(2) to prevent the client from committing a crime or fraud that is reasonably certain to result in substantial injury to the financial interests or property of another and in furtherance of which the client has used or is using the lawyer's services;
This the part you concern yourself with. It still shows the lawyer as a protector not an active participant in some criminal activity yet to be determined by undermining the very essence of this rule that has been on full display by our Dictatorial Justice Department.
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 7:40 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:39 pm to themunch
quote:
The only Red meat I see in here is YOU.
You’re a vegan though. I can tell. Gluten free too?
This post was edited on 4/16/18 at 7:41 pm
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:40 pm to themunch
quote:
This the part you concern yourself with.
Interesting syntax. What’s your native language?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:40 pm to JudgeHolden
I just started a new garden plot.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:42 pm to themunch
Interesting. Is it springtime in Novosibirsk?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:42 pm to JudgeHolden
quote:
If someone instructed Cohen to pay off Stormy for the campaign, that is not privileged. The communication furthers the crime.
Popular
Back to top



3







