- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:44 pm to JudgeHolden
Is that near the Rhineland?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 7:56 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
Now that that is established, the onus is ON THE ACCUSER(s) to reasonably PROVE the assertion wrong.
Actually, it is up to the party claiming the privilege, to prove that it applies. If Cohen says that he has business and legal clients, it is up to him to establish that the documents which he claims as privileged apply to a client who qualifies for the attorney-client privilege.
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:02 pm to themunch
quote:
themunch
Where do you live?
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:03 pm to JudgeHolden
Thirty-Fourth and Vine
Posted on 4/16/18 at 8:57 pm to NC_Tigah
quote:
This is as intrusive a legal action as I have ever heard of. When juxtaposed with actions in the HRC email case, at the complete opposite end of the spectrum, the comparison is stunning.
There is a lot of (dis)information going around that claims that the execution of the subpoena and the collection of the documents was a clearly outside legal protocol.
However, Trey Gowdy has commented on more than one occasion that the Cohen subpoena was properly executed. Gowdy certainly should know.
Page 11 of 11
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News