Started By
Message

re: FBI calls Tucker a liar

Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:46 pm to
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89570 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:46 pm to
quote:

Yep. Now do the FBI



I never said they didn't.



I also am not the one holding Tucker up as the truth like others on this board do.


But the fbi was more right than Tucker.



This was written few days after the assassination by reuters.


quote:

A review of Crooks’ phone by the Federal Bureau of Investigation found he had searched for images of both President Joe Biden and Trump, as well as other famous figures, in the days before the shooting, the New York Times reported on Wednesday, citing U.S. lawmakers briefed on the law enforcement investigation.

Crooks had been searching for the dates of Trump’s public appearances and of the Democratic National Convention, the report said. He had also looked up “major depressive disorder” on his phone, the Times said. Reuters was unable to independently confirm the report.



.

Rueters article from July of 24
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70928 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:47 pm to
What do you make of them saying "this FBI?"
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89570 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:48 pm to
quote:


Where is the lie?



quote:

The FBI told us Thomas Crooks tried to kill Donald Trump last summer but somehow had no online footprint. The FBI lied, and we can prove it because we have his posts. The question is why? Story tomorrow.



Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21292 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:49 pm to
quote:

Cool, Mr FBI Rapid Response. So the FBI DOES have the footprint and your sorry arse is STILL burying it.


Last I can find on google, prior to today, linking FBI and Thomas Crooks in any form or fashion is August 29th 2024.

Go figure.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21292 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

This was written few days after the assassination by reuters.


None of that really points towards or away from an online footprint... and after that the FBI seemingly clammed up.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89570 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:51 pm to
quote:

What do you make of them saying "this FBI?"


What?


We knew he had an online footprint back in July of 2024. Tucker is just saying bullshite with his tweet. I'm willing to bet we learn nothing new from him tomorrow.


Some people might learn something new, but it will be info you could have already found.



Posted by SouthEasternKaiju
SouthEast... you figure it out
Member since Aug 2021
46855 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

They already said that the FBI didn’t claim the kid had no online profile.


So, we're believing the Steele dossier 4 FISA warrants issued FBI now, are we?
Posted by 3down10
Member since Sep 2014
39571 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Where is the lie?


No, I meant in your quote about his dad and getting mad, not the OP.

As for the OP, I'm unaware of any online footprint he had and it will be interesting to see what it was. I'll probably check that episode out.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
166742 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:52 pm to


So Tucker Carlson is airing something already available as a scoop? I thought this was his producer Andrew that called MAGA cousin frickers, giving a preview. It isn't it is an old post.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89570 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

None of that really points towards or away from an online footprint... and after that the FBI seemingly clammed up.



Looking up what I searched online with search engines would be my online footprint.


He also chatted on discord.



I don't have a Facebook, doesn't mean I don't have an online footprint.


What do you think we will learn from Tucker?





Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70928 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

What?


I'm curious if you notice a difference between "the FBI" and "this FBI."

It's ok if you don't, but that's what I meant and hopefully answers your question.
Posted by dgnx6
Member since Feb 2006
89570 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

I'm curious if you notice a difference between "the FBI" and "this FBI."

It's ok if you don't, but that's what I meant and hopefully answers your question.




No I'm not worried about it because "this" fbi wasn't in charge in July of 2024 when we learned he had an online footprint.

This fbi, that fbi, doesn't matter. Tucker is still wrong.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
166742 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 4:58 pm to
Andrew owns gab, correct? Why is Tucker hyping something known? I forgot Gab claimed he posted.

Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.


Posted by YouKnowImRight
Parts Unknown
Member since Oct 2023
2953 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Where is the lie?



Dude cost Fox hundreds of millions because he is a liar. That's documented.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21292 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:00 pm to
So, I looked up what online footprint means and there is a distinction between active and passive. What we're doing now is active... browsing history is passive.

That aside- the FBI has been very clammed up on anything they learned about Crooks aside from his search history and movements up to the shooting. Very much "Nothing to see here".

quote:

He also chatted on discord.


We had at least some of CK's killer's discord chats very soon after the assassination- I'm curious why that is not the case for Crooks.

quote:

What do you think we will learn from Tucker?

I suspect that Tucker has something that the FBI hasn't shared yet... it may not be much, but something. Maybe it's the discord history, who knows?

Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138552 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

FBI calls Tucker a liar
GOOD!

Sue his arse to oblivion if possible!

Either Tucker has lost his mind, meaning he's literally gone clinically insane; or he's doing this stuff to make money.

If it's the latter, then sue his arse to oblivion!
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
59093 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:02 pm to
I’m confident the federal bureau of Indians will do the needful
Posted by sabanisarustedspoke
Member since Jan 2007
5862 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:03 pm to
quote:


We knew he had an online footprint back in July of 2024. Tucker is just saying bullshite with his tweet. I'm willing to bet we learn nothing new from him tomorrow.



What? Pray tell, please tell me anything about him. I don't care what he said or she said or any of that **** crap, I would simply like to know ANYTHING about the kid who shot Trump in Butler. And if you can give me any information you would be as valuable as Tucker will be tomorrow.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
21292 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Either Tucker has lost his mind, meaning he's literally gone clinically insane; or he's doing this stuff to make money.


Or... he has some information that hasn't been shared yet. Let's let the show run before we get to measuring straitjackets or ropes.
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
70928 posts
Posted on 11/13/25 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

No I'm not worried about it because "this" fbi wasn't in charge in July of 2024 when we learned he had an online footprint.


Got it.

I think the wording was careful and intentional, but who knows?

I'll see what Tucker has to say tomorrow. Likely nothing.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram