- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Explosive 9/11 Claims by Richard Gage | PBD Podcast | Ep. 183
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:10 pm to Hognutz
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:10 pm to Hognutz
quote:
Two planes brought three high rise buildings down in a manner that looks like a controlled demolition. If you question this you're a conspiracy theorist.
Or you might not understand how structures behave when they are weakened and how load paths work in structures as one component begins to yield and strain.
2
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:13 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:
I just cannot under how anyone can believe that explosives were smuggled in, set up, survived burning jet fuel, were remotely detonated, and no real evidence exists.
And it would take a lot of people to pull it off and keep it secret.
Three may keep a secret, if two of them are dead.– Benjamin Franklin
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:15 pm to BamaScoop
quote:
I’m not really a conspiracy theorist on the 9/11 attack but I do think any person of average intelligence would question the possibility of this two building falling perfectly on themselves like an implosion. I just find that to basically be impossible.
Well, you’re wrong because it happened.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:20 pm to BamaScoop
quote:
I’m not really a conspiracy theorist on the 9/11 attack but I do think any person of average intelligence would question the possibility of this two building falling perfectly on themselves like an implosion. I just find that to basically be impossible.
Draw a gravity vector with respect to level ground.
Put a tall building on that vector and let it stand for a few decades.
Now. start knocking stuff off the top of that building and watch what happens to the stuff.
pretty simple concept.
to make a building like that 'topple over' would require starting at the bottom and start selectively weakening supports on adjacent corners and begin to establish an off center load. but SLOWLY - so an offset c.g. could establish a built up torque.
If you started by just blowing up the adjacent corners, it would still mostly fall straight down.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:23 pm to BamaScoop
If it was an implosion demo, why didn't the windows blow out?
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:24 pm to jp4lsu
quote:
Or you might not understand how structures behave when they are weakened and how load paths work in structures as one component begins to yield and strain.
yep - too many people think a building like that has all the properties of a 4x4.
They probably think you could lay it down over a river and use it as a bridge.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:24 pm to BayouBlitz
The board is getting better slowly. 
At least this 9/11 CT thread acknowledges that airplanes were involved. The last couple haven’t even done that.
At least this 9/11 CT thread acknowledges that airplanes were involved. The last couple haven’t even done that. Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:25 pm to jp4lsu
I understand two planes hitting two buildings and knocking down three makes no sense, but yeah, maybe I'm not bright enough to grasp it.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:28 pm to jp4lsu
quote:
If you had demolition charges big enough to blow those beams, you would've seen an explosion out the sided of the building all the way around.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:28 pm to Hognutz
quote:
I understand two planes hitting two buildings and knocking down three makes no sense, but yeah, maybe I'm not bright enough to grasp it.
I can tell you have a well informed, researched, and educated view on the topic.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:32 pm to Gaspergou202
Dude Silverstein is on video saying they decided to “ Pull” building 7 . If the explosives weren’t in the building already when did they get there?
LINK
LINK
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:33 pm to BamaScoop
quote:
I’m not really a conspiracy theorist on the 9/11 attack but I do think any person of average intelligence would question the possibility of this two building falling perfectly on themselves like an implosion. I just find that to basically be impossible.
Do these average intelligence people contemplate the way the building was engineered where pancaking is the most likely outcome when upper level floors are weakened?
Do average intelligence people also know enough about that gravity thingy to understand the natural direction of falling objects?
Just wondering how low the bar of average intelligence has been lowered.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:35 pm to Hognutz
quote:
I understand two planes hitting two buildings and knocking down three makes no sense, but yeah, maybe I'm not bright enough to grasp it.
Dunning and Kruger strike again.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:42 pm to DreauxB2015
quote:
Dude Silverstein is on video saying they decided to “ Pull” building 7 . If the explosives weren’t in the building already when did they get there?
And what are some other possible meanings for using that phrase? Are you only able to consider one meaning that fits a preferred narrative?
Posted on 9/28/22 at 2:56 pm to Gaspergou202
quote:
I find that much more reasonable than training a bunch of morons to crash two planes just above a shite ton of preplanted explosives. I just cannot under how anyone can believe that explosives were smuggled in, set up, survived burning jet fuel, were remotely detonated, and no real evidence exists.
And these terrorist morons fully cooperated with our government, while those in their home nation who were also aware, failed to embarrass us with their knowledge of those details that would lead to a coup.
Also, what a massively impressive scheme. Not even Hollywood could make it seem remotely plausible that one of the most populated buildings in the world could have explosives set up inside it for a future controlled demolition, during the workday without any occupants knowing.
Anyone that has ever worked near a building undergoing preparation for controlled demolition knows how impossible it would be to pre-cut the steel, to string miles of detonation cord, not to mention all the explosive charges all while everyone went about their normal workday without anyone noticing or suspecting a thing.
I’m not sure if it’s better described as retarded or mentally ill to believe it was brought down by controlled demolition. But it is something much worse than just stupid.
This post was edited on 9/28/22 at 2:58 pm
Posted on 9/28/22 at 3:06 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Sure buddy, anything but explain how wtc-7 collapsed without the magic of an airplane strike.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 3:11 pm to Hognutz
quote:
Sure buddy, anything but explain how wtc-7 collapsed without the magic of an airplane strike.
Is "I don't know" really the driver behind whatever it is that you believe happened, or do you have something more useful to offer.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 3:13 pm to Willbe76
I think anybody who thinks 9/11 was caused by planes flown by middle eastern terrorists is a fricking idiot. You’d have to be pretty dumb to still buy that
Posted on 9/28/22 at 3:18 pm to DisplacedBuckeye
Well, lets see, it looks like a textbook controlled demolition to me. Your turn.
Posted on 9/28/22 at 3:18 pm to Hognutz
quote:
Well, lets see, it looks like a textbook controlled demolition to me. Your turn.
No, it doesn't.
Back to you.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News