- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Explain climate change to me like I’m five
Posted on 8/25/22 at 6:51 am to tarzana
Posted on 8/25/22 at 6:51 am to tarzana
quote:
Climate change denial is a hoax Fixed it for you. Even hard-core conservatives recognize that today's climatic patterns, with its predeliction for extreme, destructive weather events in rapid-fire succession, is the antithesis of anything normal.
The fact that you typed that message on computer or phone makes you a hypocrite. Go live in Africa or South America in the jungle. Otherwise you are contributing to the climate change.
Everything you eat, drive, live in comes from fossil fuels. Any technology you use, utilized fossil fuels in some way.
Also, there are tribes in Africa that burn either wood or dung for warmth, both of which are worse in regards to CO2 production.
At least argue for nuclear energy, which doesn’t produce CO2….
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:06 am to tarzana
quote:
Fixed it for you
Can men menstruate?
Can men become pregnant?
Is a 25 year old man who has undergone 5 years of hormone treatment on the same level physically as a 25 year old woman as it relates to Athletic competition?
Also, please define woman.
If you cannot correctly answer all these questions, your opinion on any and everything is shite.
The $cientists whose word you take as Gospel, for the most part, would fail this test.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:07 am to tarzana
quote:
is the antithesis of anything normal.
Define "normal" as it relates to weather.
Hint: You can't.
Weather is and always has been exceptionally unpredictable.
It will always be that way.
It is a dynamic component of Nature.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:17 am to TigerAttorney
Climate changes are strongly correlated to solar activity. The current narrative is simply an excuse for people in power to gain more control and make more money.
Mars has climate changes. Last time I checked, there were no coal plants there.
Mars has climate changes. Last time I checked, there were no coal plants there.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:34 am to TigerAttorney
quote:
Screw the student loan scraps Biden threw out today, the “Inflation Induction Act” is what people need to be up in arms about.
FTFY
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:35 am to tarzana
quote:
it's our moral authority to provide leadership to counteract, or at least slow down climate change/ AGW.
But it doesn’t exist so…
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:37 am to TigerAttorney
Celebs and politicians most advocating for climate change are the exact same ones who fly private and spend time on yachts
Hypocrisy at its finest
Hypocrisy at its finest
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:37 am to TigerAttorney
It is a way for people who have no value to society to scam companies and tax payers out of money.
Climate change =
People scamming for money
PSFM
Climate change =
People scamming for money
PSFM
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:40 am to TigerAttorney
Might not be "like your five".... But when your wife/SO wants an expensive couch/dress/,_______ and it's now 10% off and she saved you money by buying it
Except in this case your wife/SO also has a side gig selling the couch and is taking that commission you paid her for and putting in it in a separate account
Except in this case your wife/SO also has a side gig selling the couch and is taking that commission you paid her for and putting in it in a separate account
Posted on 8/25/22 at 7:45 am to TigerAttorney
Basically it’s the latest thing that the elites are using to scare you into making irrational/illogical decisions that will eventually cause you to lose most of your freedoms and are all done so in the name of making all things on the earth equal.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:18 am to TigerAttorney
The best explanation for climate change I've found is from Micheal Crichton's take on the issue. Aliens... makes more sense than any other argument I've seen. It is a bit of a read, but it is worth it.
LINK
LINK
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:24 am to TigerAttorney
To quote Kamala: Climate is a thing, and it changes and it is baaad.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:28 am to TigerAttorney
It's a natural occurring phenomenon.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:28 am to TigerAttorney
Climate Change = Money laundering
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:38 am to TigerAttorney
People are drawing sweeping conclusions with about 100 years of reliable weather data ignoring solar cycles and weather patterns. CO2 that plants take in to grow is now bad and must be eliminated from the earth.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:45 am to TigerAttorney
quote:
Explain climate change to me like I’m five
You go trick or treating and get a lot of candy.
Your older brother sits in the basement with his friend and reads porn mags and plays video games while you are gone.
You get home with the candy you walked blocks to get.
Your brother grabs a substantial portion of it and gives half of that to his friend.
You are told they will keep it for you so it don’t melt. Just trust them. They will handle it.
Temps stay cool in November and you ask for it back.
Your brother and friend laugh and say it stayed cool because you gave them half of your candy.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:46 am to TigerAttorney
Cliff's Notes:
Global Wealth Redistribution. It has ZERO to do with the world environment. When you excuse the 2 largest polluters in the world, this is not debatable.
Global Wealth Redistribution. It has ZERO to do with the world environment. When you excuse the 2 largest polluters in the world, this is not debatable.
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:49 am to TigerAttorney
HERE READ ALL THIS: read points and counterpoints by clicking on them.
manmade climate change is BS
POINT #3:
Human produced CO2 has increased over the last 100 years adding to the Greenhouse effect and in turn fueling most of the warming of the last 100 years.
COUNTERPOINT
Over the past 100 years CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has indeed increased primarily due to the increased use of fossil fuels. However, inferring that the increase in CO2 concentration caused the earth’s warming is incorrect. The Vostok Antarctica ice core measurements have demonstrated that temperature changes precede CO2 concentration changes by about 800 years.
POINT #7:
The UN's IPCC has proven that man–made CO2 causes global warming.
COUNTERPOINT
No scientific proof that man-made CO2 causes significant global warming has been found by the IPCC even though they do their best to look for it.
It is important to note that the IPCC was not created to evaluate the cause of climate change but to document that it is man-made. In their own words:
The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.
(2. in PRINCIPLES GOVERNING IPCC WORK)
In 1996 they were caught blatantly corrupting the peer-review process for their “The Science of Climate Change 1995” report (Wall Street Journal A Major Deception On Global Warming). The article reports that the following passages were in the approved report but deleted from the supposedly peer-reviewed published version:
• None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed [climate] changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases.
• No study to date has positively attributed all or part [of the climate change observed to date] to anthropogenic [man-made] causes.
• Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the total natural variability of the climate system are reduced.
Energy balance calculations, (Gregory, 2020) including urban and natural warming, demonstrate that the transient climate response of a gradual doubling of CO2 concentration yields a global temperature change of 0.83 ºC. Which is much less, in comparison, than the IPCC computer model estimated value of 1.8 ºC. The calculations show that CO2 caused 0.265 ºC of the 0.67 ºC of warming from 1901 to 2000, or just 40%.
manmade climate change is BS
POINT #3:
Human produced CO2 has increased over the last 100 years adding to the Greenhouse effect and in turn fueling most of the warming of the last 100 years.
COUNTERPOINT
Over the past 100 years CO2 concentration in the atmosphere has indeed increased primarily due to the increased use of fossil fuels. However, inferring that the increase in CO2 concentration caused the earth’s warming is incorrect. The Vostok Antarctica ice core measurements have demonstrated that temperature changes precede CO2 concentration changes by about 800 years.
POINT #7:
The UN's IPCC has proven that man–made CO2 causes global warming.
COUNTERPOINT
No scientific proof that man-made CO2 causes significant global warming has been found by the IPCC even though they do their best to look for it.
It is important to note that the IPCC was not created to evaluate the cause of climate change but to document that it is man-made. In their own words:
The role of the IPCC is to assess on a comprehensive, objective, open and transparent basis the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant to understanding the scientific basis of risk of human-induced climate change, its potential impacts and options for adaptation and mitigation.
(2. in PRINCIPLES GOVERNING IPCC WORK)
In 1996 they were caught blatantly corrupting the peer-review process for their “The Science of Climate Change 1995” report (Wall Street Journal A Major Deception On Global Warming). The article reports that the following passages were in the approved report but deleted from the supposedly peer-reviewed published version:
• None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed [climate] changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases.
• No study to date has positively attributed all or part [of the climate change observed to date] to anthropogenic [man-made] causes.
• Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the total natural variability of the climate system are reduced.
Energy balance calculations, (Gregory, 2020) including urban and natural warming, demonstrate that the transient climate response of a gradual doubling of CO2 concentration yields a global temperature change of 0.83 ºC. Which is much less, in comparison, than the IPCC computer model estimated value of 1.8 ºC. The calculations show that CO2 caused 0.265 ºC of the 0.67 ºC of warming from 1901 to 2000, or just 40%.
This post was edited on 8/25/22 at 9:14 am
Posted on 8/25/22 at 8:52 am to Grim
quote:
You'd have a better chance getting an accurate answer if you asked your dog. The average IQ on this board is subterranean
At least we are smart enough to earn enough to pay our debts.
Since when is being dirt broke considered intelligent?
Posted on 8/25/22 at 9:00 am to oldskule
quote:
Climate change is the responsiblity of Mother Nature.
Global Warming is the responsibility of Mother Nature.
fixed it...
so much of a hoax the liberal bastards changed the name to make it fit the narrative.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News