- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:05 pm to MKP2004
quote:
Jesus Christ
Yes?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:06 pm to phaz
Bomb her
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:08 pm to phaz
So I googled what the global benefits would be if the US became a 0 carbon emissions country and got this:
If the United States became a zero-carbon country, models project the direct reduction in global temperature would be a fraction of a degree—averaging about 0.015F to 0.3F of averted warming by the year 2100.
The direct impact of the U.S. reaching net-zero is considered very small for the following reasons:
- Emissions Share: The U.S. contributes approximately 14% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Because the remaining 86% of global emissions would continue under status-quo scenarios, U.S. actions alone have a limited direct effect on total global temperatures.
- Averted Warming vs. Cooling: The scientific consensus is that reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions globally or regionally does not immediately cause the Earth's temperature to decrease. Instead, it largely stops the temperature from increasing further (i.e., averts additional warming).
- Ocean Lag: Even if all global emissions were completely stopped, residual heat trapped in the oceans would cause a small amount of additional "committed" warming before temperatures ultimately stabilize.
Does this bitch speak English and does anyone have her e-mail address?
If the United States became a zero-carbon country, models project the direct reduction in global temperature would be a fraction of a degree—averaging about 0.015F to 0.3F of averted warming by the year 2100.
The direct impact of the U.S. reaching net-zero is considered very small for the following reasons:
- Emissions Share: The U.S. contributes approximately 14% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Because the remaining 86% of global emissions would continue under status-quo scenarios, U.S. actions alone have a limited direct effect on total global temperatures.
- Averted Warming vs. Cooling: The scientific consensus is that reaching net-zero greenhouse gas emissions globally or regionally does not immediately cause the Earth's temperature to decrease. Instead, it largely stops the temperature from increasing further (i.e., averts additional warming).
- Ocean Lag: Even if all global emissions were completely stopped, residual heat trapped in the oceans would cause a small amount of additional "committed" warming before temperatures ultimately stabilize.
Does this bitch speak English and does anyone have her e-mail address?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:09 pm to Madking
The third world 5th column longs for the living conditions they left behind and demands their new hosts adopt their previous standard of living.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:11 pm to Wraytex
Conditioned suffering is a big part of the lefts program
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:14 pm to lake chuck fan
quote:
If they're too dumb to own air conditioning.... how is that my problem?
Well, they’re arresting AC owners. The smart ones must be culled!
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:25 pm to phaz
So many foreigners have USDS(US derangement syndrome).
I guess that’s the price of being the big dog in the world. We’re the 96-00 Yankees or the Brady Patriots. They are the Cleveland Browns.
I guess that’s the price of being the big dog in the world. We’re the 96-00 Yankees or the Brady Patriots. They are the Cleveland Browns.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 5:31 pm
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:27 pm to phaz
We've reduced our emissions more significantly than any developed nation on earth. That commie wannabe' Angela Davis bitch can FOAD.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:28 pm to phaz
I suspect the amount of product in that fro has equal blame
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:29 pm to Texas Yarddog
quote:
Germans can be just as insufferable and both will be Muslim countries in 40yrs.
At this point, it's looking like we will be too.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:34 pm to phaz
It’s called weather you stupid twit.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:35 pm to phaz
quote:
Europe heat wave, our fault
Liberals over here in the U.S. would be dutifully nodding in agreement and trying to grovel and apologize for it.
All of these people (including our liberals) are absolutely batshite ridiculous teetering on full blown insane.
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:37 pm to phaz
Don't even care what some retarded DEI puppet thinks.
She hates us because she and the rest of them ain't us.
Because we are cool, BTU level cool.
24000 BTU level cool.
She hates us because she and the rest of them ain't us.
Because we are cool, BTU level cool.
24000 BTU level cool.
This post was edited on 6/29/26 at 5:39 pm
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:37 pm to rob0710
quote:
I'm sure she is in AC. Not having AC is for the citizens, not important government officials.
Exactly!
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:40 pm to phaz
Arizona and Florida are hotter than Europe and are booming.
Maybe France is the issue
Maybe France is the issue
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:41 pm to phaz
ofc
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:52 pm to phaz
One of the most valid measures of environmental “costs” is emissions per gdp, or “carbon intensity”.
Basically, how much do you produce for a given amount of emissions?
By that measure, the US is more efficient than 49 other countries.
LINK
France is even better, so I’ll grant that.
That being said, where is your criticism of Iran, China, Russia, Canada, Australia,…?
Basically, how much do you produce for a given amount of emissions?
By that measure, the US is more efficient than 49 other countries.
LINK
France is even better, so I’ll grant that.
That being said, where is your criticism of Iran, China, Russia, Canada, Australia,…?
Posted on 6/29/26 at 5:52 pm to Sid E Walker
quote:
If the United States became a zero-carbon country, models project the direct reduction in global temperature would be a fraction of a degree—averaging about 0.015F to 0.3F of averted warming by the year 2100.
Every morning low this week will be a different temperature variation of 1-5 degrees here from 74 to 79. Every afternoon high will be from 87 to 92 degrees. That is called Summer in SW LA. It's been this way for a long time. quote:
- Emissions Share: The U.S. contributes approximately 14% of global greenhouse gas emissions. Because the remaining 86% of global emissions would continue under status-quo scenarios, U.S. actions alone have a limited direct effect on total global temperatures.
An Inconvenient Truth for the green outside, commie-red inside AGW hustlers.
Page 2 of 4
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News