Started By
Message

re: Epstein Transparency Act II

Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:50 pm to
Posted by PorkSammich
North FL
Member since Sep 2013
18152 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:50 pm to
quote:

We want him to name the names like he promised


But never want to hold Trump accountable for his promises.
Posted by Undertow
Member since Sep 2016
9353 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:57 pm to
At this point I’m ready to release everything unredacted so long as Massie signs a waiver that he would be held responsible for any lawsuits of innocent people who’s reputation or livelihood is threatened by its release.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
12117 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:58 pm to
quote:

THREE? seriously?


Only half of the files have been released. The DOJ has refused to release internal memos explaining why prosecutions didn't go forward.

Yes, three. There might be ZERO unprosecuted perps. There might be 100.

Just follow the law and release all the files. Why is this such a difficult concept?

We agree that all immigration laws should be followed. Why are people so opposed to Massie's law being followed?

Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44151 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:58 pm to
There are likely to be things in the remaining files that are not only under investigation, but also matters of national security. Wish in one hand, shite in the other. We will eventually get them, but not until the whole kit and kaboodle comes crashing down.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44151 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:59 pm to
quote:

The DOJ has refused to release internal memos explaining why prosecutions didn't go forward.



National security concerns. I frickin guarantee it.

Epstein was/is MOSSAD. He also appears to have moonlighted with the Americans, the Saudi Arabians, and probably the Russians too.

Israel, Saudi Arabia, CIA. With a boatload of documents being withheld from the timeframe around 9-11. This isn't rocket science.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 6:02 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
172468 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:07 pm to
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44151 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:10 pm to
These idiots believe Reid Hoffman is innocent despite being named by many people even within Epstein's orbit. But he wasn't named by Massie. Massie is more concerned with slandering innocent people and dead men.

quote:

Mason Massie is the co-founder & CTO of Reflex Robotics, per his LinkedIn. Reid Hoffman is involved with Outset Capital, which financially invested in Reflex Robotics. Now you know why Reid wasn't one of the 14 names Thomas read on the floor recently.

Thomas Massie is the Epstein Class. He has no principles & is guided by money. He will remain silent about people in the files if it benefits him or someone close to him.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 6:13 pm
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
12117 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

Thomas Massie sees this as a political wedge issue and he is milking that frickin thing right out the door. He is a contemptible piece of shite Democrat in a GOP suit and he is showing his true colors yet again and the ACTUAL frickING SEALS like Ivory Bill here are pretending not to know this because they too are RINOs.


Sorry I am just seeing this. RINO? When Trump was elected, PoliBoard was unanimous in supporting release of the Epstein files. Below is the screenshot of the 119 to ZERO votes for releasing the files on the 1/25/25 thread.

Massie first became hated around here because Trump changed his mind about releasing the Epstein files. Why? Who knows?

So, I don't think Epstein law 2.0 is a wedge issue. It's a logical response to the DOJ cover-up.

The Hegseth Impeachment, on the other hand, does seem to be Massie attempting to torpedo the Republican party in hopes of splintering enough AF people to support Massie's America First 2028 presidential campaign. Massie isn't drawing the volume of attention that he wanted on that. Johnson's cowardly move of suspending the House to avoid a vote on Impeachment is the only thing giving that story legs.

I couldn't support a Massie 2028 independent run because it might get a Democrat elected. I'm pretty much a single issue voter in terms of Christian Worldview.






Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44151 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

So, I don't think Epstein law 2.0 is a wedge issue. It's a logical response to the DOJ cover-up.



There is no fricking DoJ coverup is the point. And Massie knows this. So yes, it is absolutely being used by him as a wedge issue. And you pretending to not understand this makes you a RINO in my eyes too. And very much one of the real clapping seals around here, to borrow a phrase you're so ready to use for others.
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
5741 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:32 pm to
Massie didn’t say one word about Epstein until musk said trumps name is in the files. Massie has had a problem with Trump for awhile hence why he campaigned with Ron DeSantis. Try again bub
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
12117 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:47 pm to
quote:

National security concerns. I frickin guarantee it.

Epstein was/is MOSSAD. He also appears to have moonlighted with the Americans, the Saudi Arabians, and probably the Russians too.

Israel, Saudi Arabia, CIA. With a boatload of documents being withheld from the timeframe around 9-11. This isn't rocket science.


I agree with you.

That's not what DOJ has claimed though.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
12117 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 6:57 pm to
quote:

Massie didn’t say one word about Epstein until musk said trumps name is in the files.


Not surprisingly, you are lying. Musk's tweet about Trump was on June 5, 2025. On February 28, 2025, immediately after DOJ’s first release, Massie publicly criticized the administration for not releasing the files and said the failure to release them showed Trump didn’t yet have operational control of DOJ and FBI.

As for the DeSantis stuff, I didn't follow it closely. I thought Massie and Trump made up and Massie enthusiastically endorsed Trump after DeSantis dropped out. Genuine question: did Trump publicly attack Massie before their Epstein Files fight.

I could be wrong, but I don't remember much Massie hate on PoliBoard before Trump went scorched Earth over the Epstein files.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 7:08 pm
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44151 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:00 pm to
quote:

I agree with you.

That's not what DOJ has claimed though.


Ok then. By extension you must agree that what Massie is doing is stupid. Also, again, Bondi has confirmed there are ongoing investigations. What I'm saying is that those investigations are going to include matters of national security and this explains the secrecy on the subject. I think the remaining documents are likely to be related to a whole host of issues that have nothing to do with the sex abuse shite. This guy was involved with eugenics programs, apparently 9-11 stuff, and even "UFO" research. As I said before, he had his hands in everything.
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
5741 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:01 pm to
Stop calling people liars when you have lied many times before. You literally can’t make a post without saying it and it’s getting old. Again you’re far from a saint a guy who just came off a ban. STFU
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
12117 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:03 pm to
quote:

There is no fricking DoJ coverup is the point. And Massie knows this. So yes, it is absolutely being used by him as a wedge issue. And you pretending to not understand this makes you a RINO in my eyes too. And very much one of the real clapping seals around here, to borrow a phrase you're so ready to use for others.


We'll just have to disagree about whether there is a DOJ cover-up or not. Katie Phang's lawsuit is going to probably lead to criminal contempt for the DOJ.

WHY the DOJ is covering up, I have no idea. I agree with you that Epstein was probably tightly connected to intelligence. If those ties were with FOREIGN intelligence, that weakens a national security privilege.
Posted by IvoryBillMatt
Member since Mar 2020
12117 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:09 pm to
[quote]Stop calling people liars when you have lied many times before. You literally can’t make a post without saying it and it’s getting old. Again you’re far from a saint a guy who just came off a ban. STFU[/quote

Point to one time I have lied.
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
5741 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:10 pm to
Dude give it up you’re roadgator. You both are the only two on this site to say clapping seal, verbatim per search. You both constantly worry about me, SDV, and other posters. You both constantly call other posters liars. You both obsessively use AI. Enough man
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 7:13 pm
Posted by SlidellCajun
Slidell la
Member since May 2019
17235 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:15 pm to
Promises made

Errrrr

Nevermind

Posted by davyjones
NELA
Member since Feb 2019
37795 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:19 pm to
No one promised you anything, bro. Certainly not what you think they did. Or want to think they did. Many of you “hear” things that y’all somehow twist into impossible objectives. Otherwise known as unreasonable and unrealistic expectations. Artificially manufactured unreasonable and unrealistic expectations. Which ain’t President Trump’s problem.
Posted by DeBoar
Member since Jan 2024
5741 posts
Posted on 9/16/26 at 7:20 pm to
If Trump even made 99/100 promises they’d still complain. Grown arse adults most of them who don’t even vote they just shite talk.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram