0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Epstein Transparency Act II
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:33 pm to Cheese Grits
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:33 pm to Cheese Grits
Both parties have determined how to assist each other in avoiding Watergate type fallout
Posted on 9/16/26 at 3:34 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Ai boi you go.
Why didn't the greatest legislator in the history of Congress enact this in the super duper first Epstein transparency act?
Why didn't the greatest legislator in the history of Congress enact this in the super duper first Epstein transparency act?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:32 pm to BoarEd
quote:
This is pure bullshite. He had access to the files and he knows damn well that there is stuff in there they cannot release yet because there are pending investigations.
Is the DOJ claiming that?
I have seen them claim that the 3 million files that haven't been released are "duplicative." That's not an exception to Massie's law.
If you're interested, Google Katie Phang's lawsuit.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:35 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Yes, before leaving her position Pam Bondi confirmed during her testimony before Congress that there are still active investigations ongoing pertaining to Epstein related matters. You, being a lawyer, know full well that any materials relating to any of those investigations will not be made public. Nor should they. Massie knows this as well.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:40 pm to Jbird
quote:
Ai boi you go.
Why didn't the greatest legislator in the history of Congress enact this in the super duper first Epstein transparency act?
Yup, I was wrong to respond to you with facts.
I showed you the courtesy of actually responding to you with details. Rather than dispute the facts...or even thanking me for taking the time to give you the details you requested...you respond with an insult.
As I said before, I don't think Massie anticipated that the Department of Justice would ignore the law. Epstein Files 2.0 cures that with enforcement provisions.
This post was edited on 9/16/26 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 9/16/26 at 4:56 pm to IvoryBillMatt
Insult?
Are you really that sensitive?
Are you really that sensitive?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:00 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Pam Bondi confirmed during her testimony before Congress that there are still active investigations ongoing pertaining to Epstein related matters.
I saw that and thought she was lying. Her DOJ in July of 2025 said clearly that there was nothing left to investigate:
"This systematic review revealed no incriminating “client list.” There was also no credible evidence found that Epstein blackmailed prominent individuals as part of his actions. We did not uncover evidence that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties."
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:07 pm to Jbird
quote:
Insult?
Are you really that sensitive?
You're right. "AI boi" is more of a deflection than an insult.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:15 pm to moosehound
Anyone who is not putting Bill Clinton to the front of the line is not serious.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:18 pm to moosehound
It came out Masshole didnt name a man because he was in his favor of something.
What a jackass. Go to Kentucky, Masshole buy a new boner phone.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:20 pm to BoarEd
quote:
You, being a lawyer, know full well that any materials relating to any of those investigations will not be made public.
You're not claiming that DOJ is saying that all 3 million withheld files relate to ongoing investigations are you?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:35 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
quote:
We want him to name the names like he promised
No one needs another JE Act. Pass the Save America Act fricking loser
-He did name names. Earlier this month he added 3 names of possible predators.
THREE? seriously?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:38 pm to IvoryBillMatt
quote:
I saw that and thought she was lying
You shouldn't respond to people about not relaying facts to them when this is how you respond to people presenting you with facts yourself.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:40 pm to IvoryBillMatt
How many of them are legally bound per the ndas signed by the victims who took money?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:41 pm to moosehound
Shouldn't the save act come first 
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:44 pm to cajunangelle
quote:
It came out Masshole didnt name a man because he was in his favor of something.
I can’t remember who it was but rumors circulating on Twitter was Massie’s son works for one and or one is an associate of Ro Khanna
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:46 pm to MikkUGA
Ndas ain't shite. This is a dead story. These people should have been in jail 20yrs ago.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:47 pm to BoarEd
quote:
You shouldn't respond to people about not relaying facts to them when this is how you respond to people presenting you with facts yourself.
It's absolutely a fact that Bondi said that. It's just not proof that it's true that there were ongoing investigations. Bondi has little credibility about the Epstein Files. Do you really need a list of her lies?
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:48 pm to IvoryBillMatt
The things I have said in this thread make perfect sense of everything we have seen from the administration on this matter. You asked me a question about the files. I didn't answer it because I have already spoken to it in this very thread. I am not interested in repeating myself.
The things I have said here make sense of it. Nothing else does.
The things I have said here make sense of it. Nothing else does.
Posted on 9/16/26 at 5:48 pm to Jauquismos
quote:
Shouldn't the save act come first
Masshole cant grandstand on that.
Masshole did not read Reid Hoffmans name when he recently read off names we all knew and were public...Maybe someone can look up why not...
This post was edited on 9/17/26 at 6:10 am
Page 3 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News