Page 1
Page 1
Started By
Message
locked post

Emile Hirsch Brutally Assaulted Female Film Executive; still got hired for new film

Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:16 pm
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61279 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:16 pm
These are the same misogynistic Hollywood degenerates who have lectured middle America ad nauseam on how to treat women.



quote:

Emile Hirsch Brutally Assaulted a Female Film Executive. He’s Now Starring in the New Tarantino Film.

On the night of January 25, 2015, Emile Hirsch settled into a VIP booth at Tao, a pop-up nightclub situated at the base of Main Street in the mountains of Park City, Utah. Several hours—and drinks—later, eyewitnesses say that two people had to physically pull the 29-year-old actor off of a female film executive whom he’d choked unconscious.

quote:

This past week, the news broke that Hirsch had been cast in Quentin Tarantino’s upcoming film Once Upon a Time in Hollywood, a based-on-a-true-story tale set against the backdrop of the 1969 Manson Family murders. The movie is set to star Leonardo DiCaprio, Brad Pitt, Al Pacino, Dakota Fanning, Kurt Russell, and Margot Robbie as the late Sharon Tate.

When Hirsch’s casting was announced, The Good Place actress Jameela Jamil, a pal of Bernfeld’s, criticized the decision on Twitter: “Cool. Emile Hirsch strangled my tiny female best friend until she blacked out at a party in front of dozens of witnesses at Sundance Film Festival (and was convicted) but Tarantino just cast him in a movie. INTENSE case of rich white male privilege eh? Cool. Cool. Cool.”

msn.com
Posted by LuckyTiger
Someone's Alter
Member since Dec 2008
45215 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:18 pm to
Hollywood has no moral foundation whatsoever.
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:19 pm to
Another weakling soyboi who can only beat up on women.

wanna bet hes part of the REEEEEEsistance?
Posted by hashtag
Comfy, AF
Member since Aug 2005
27480 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:19 pm to
reading this story just screams to me, "they are lying and he didn't do what they accused him of." Obviously I could be wrong. But, this just reads like a lie.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
61279 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:20 pm to
If it wasn't for bad morals Hollywood would have no morals at all.
Posted by Btrtigerfan
Disgruntled employee
Member since Dec 2007
21455 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Emile Hirsch


Is that the same baw from Church Point? I bought a skiff from that dude.
Posted by AUstar
Member since Dec 2012
17029 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

Emile Hirsch



quote:

INTENSE case of rich white male privilege eh?


Doesn't quite check out.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83571 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:23 pm to
It's Taratino.

quote:

For starters, it’s the first post-Weinstein film of Tarantino’s, whose impressive oeuvre not only helped create the Weinstein mythos but also kept his company afloat—this despite the filmmaker knowing that the mogul had attacked his ex-girlfriend, the actress Mira Sorvino. If that weren’t enough, Tarantino’s also defended Tate’s former husband Roman Polanski’s rape of a 13-year-old girl (“Look…she was down with this”); endangered the life of Uma Thurman during the filming of Kill Bill; creepily propositioned Jane Hamsher, producer of the Tarantino-penned Natural Born Killers; and called on himself to choke Diane Kruger in Inglourious Basterds.


Zero doubt dude has some weird/pervy stuff in his closet.
Posted by Shiftyplus1
Regret nothing that made you smile
Member since Oct 2005
13348 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

INTENSE case of rich white male privilege eh?


How about just rich famous people privilege you race-baiting SJW bitch.
Posted by Caplewood
Atlanta
Member since Jun 2010
39156 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:27 pm to
Ya no one acknowledges that fact though. They are always a white guy until they get offended about something, then it’s anti Semitic.
Posted by The Truth 34
Chavez Ravine
Member since May 2010
41170 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:29 pm to
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83571 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:30 pm to
Posted by Wolf
Member since Sep 2005
1336 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Reading this story just screams to me, "they are lying and he didn't do what they accused him of." Obviously I could be wrong. But, this just reads like a lie.


This isn't he said she said BS that happened in a room with no witnesses. He got plastered drunk and did this in full view of several witnesses. He doesn't even deny that it happened, but instead said she "provoked him".
This post was edited on 6/14/18 at 3:33 pm
Posted by buckeye_vol
Member since Jul 2014
35236 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 3:35 pm to
quote:

Emile Hirsch Brutally Assaulted a Female Film Executive. He’s Now Starring in the New Tarantino Film
I suspect a casting change will be made.
Posted by buffbraz
Member since Nov 2005
5673 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 4:07 pm to
In the end, you have to ask yourself....was the juice worth the squeeze.
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
3884 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 6:30 pm to

This movie is about the Manson murders, in part.

My hunch is that Hirsh was cast as Manson. Manson was a very small, distinct-looking, creepy dude. Not a lot of actors who maach his physical characteristics and have the acting chops to pull off that role. But I could definitely see Hirsch doing a good job.

They probably felt they had to cast him and just hoped the attack wouldn't resurface.

Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
99001 posts
Posted on 6/14/18 at 6:31 pm to
Is that wrong?

Are we not supposed to do that?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram