- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:34 pm to David_DJS
quote:
But spending doesn't have to be fraudulent to be wrong/bad.
Just like wrong/bad is a matter of opinion.
Spending can be called wrong/bad when it isn’t fraudulent or can be called good, even if it is not justified…
Edit - defense spending fraud isn’t considered wrong/bad by some people. Did they eliminate that fraud already?
And how much $$ went to Vulcan Elements. That can be called wrong/bad and fraud as well…
Vulcan Elements is a start-up funded by a Donald Trump Jr.-backed venture capital firm, that has been awarded a $620 million contract from the Pentagon, reports the Financial Times.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 1:41 pm
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:39 pm to Powerman
quote:Either way, we get fricked over. Dammit, now I am mad at either of those scenarios. Thanks a lot for pointing that out. (Anger not directed at you)
Is the 214 billion actually fraud though? Or just deemed unnecessary?
More angry that $trillion deficits are now celebrated (simply because it may or may not be a bigger increase than a year ago).
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:41 pm to Powerman
quote:
Spending that we don't like isn't fraud though of course
You're just being intentionally myopic. I mean, how many guilty people, upon being accused, are just going throw their hands up and admit they're guilty and give up the grift?
Again, per my earlier query to Grok:
quote:
In the agencies DOGE did investigate, Musk and the team identified potential waste and fraud amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars annually, though actual realized savings were much lower and heavily disputed. Key examples include:Over $100 billion per year in entitlements payments without proper identification (e.g., no SSN), with an estimated 50% ($50 billion/year or $1 billion/week) being obvious fraud.
Massive fraud in federal block grants to states and every major government program, including hundreds of schemes like the Feeding Our Future scandal in Minnesota (involving billions in misused child nutrition funds).
$161 million in U.S. taxpayer funds to organizations in the Democratic Republic of Congo, including $29 million for HIV/AIDS programs deemed wasteful or fraudulent.
$17 million project for tax policy advice to Liberia (canceled as waste).
Billions in improper payments and fraud uncovered in congressional hearings, such as unrecovered revenue from closed anti-corruption divisions ($247 million in one year alone).
Ideologically driven spending, like USAID funds redirected to political causes (most of its budget, potentially hundreds of millions).
That's just some top level headline items from a 4 month quick yet deep dive into the books of a few target organizations. It isn't just a disagreement about spending we don't like. Everyone on both sides of the aisle know there is waste and fraud, and both sides have profited in different ways from the grift.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:41 pm to Pragmatist2025
doesn't matter if program is legit if they are lying about numbers to get more money that is fraud plain and simple
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:43 pm to Kjnstkmn
Some of us have been saying this the whole time.
The premise that the federal budget has any business being as big as it is (fraud or no) is a false one.
The premise that the federal budget has any business being as big as it is (fraud or no) is a false one.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:44 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Yeah there is fraud but like not really that much.
Are you rooting against this because of the optics for the party of "love and inclusion?"
I’m rooting for the prosecution of fraud. But a dangerous delusion that is besetting MAGA is that we can balance our books by eliminating fraud. That is laughable. I guess Musk, who surely knows better, engages in this kind of hyperbole to get people’s attention.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:44 pm to tigersmanager
quote:Oh, it is that indeed. Good to know that they are such great gatekeepers of the shite they steal from us though.
doesn't matter if program is legit if they are lying about numbers to get more money that is fraud plain and simple
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:45 pm to Kjnstkmn
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:47 pm to Pragmatist2025
quote:
is there an amount you would say is insignificant? (Even if that figure is way off?)
This question was not addressed to me, but I’ll answer anyway. All fraud is serious and should be prosecuted. “Insignificant” is a relative term. I think the fraud is significant, but way less than what Elon Musk is saying it is…like less than 1/5th.
This post was edited on 12/29/25 at 1:47 pm
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:53 pm to Penrod
I agree. I actually don’t want to believe it is that much. That would mean that they are not just terrible stewards, but retarded-willingly-blind stewards.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:53 pm to Penrod
seems like an easy number to get to using the whole country
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:53 pm to j1897
So you would look into a mirror
Posted on 12/29/25 at 1:57 pm to ShoeBang
quote:
you're either retarded yourself or believe everything you are told.
I think it's the opposite, name me one promise or deadline Elon has publicly stated and actually came through on?
I'll wait.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 2:00 pm to Diamondawg
Inbred low IQ Somali pirates absolutely wreck shop on America.
But every time you get a new job you must show HR 3 forms of ID, a passport, and undergo a background and credit check.
But every time you get a new job you must show HR 3 forms of ID, a passport, and undergo a background and credit check.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 2:02 pm to Powerman
quote:
Any reason to take this statement seriously?
Well, for starters...it didn't come from you.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 2:02 pm to AGGIES
quote:
Just like wrong/bad is a matter of opinion.
Well, sure, but some opinions are worth more than others.
quote:
Edit - defense spending fraud isn’t considered wrong/bad by some people. Did they eliminate that fraud already?
The pentagon's budget is bloated beyond reason.
quote:
And how much $$ went to Vulcan Elements. That can be called wrong/bad and fraud as well…
Vulcan Elements is a start-up funded by a Donald Trump Jr.-backed venture capital firm, that has been awarded a $620 million contract from the Pentagon, reports the Financial Times.
Call it that.
It's not a partisan issue for me. I think "we the people" have lost all control of fedgov, and spending is the root government's power. Defund it all.
Posted on 12/29/25 at 2:05 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
they stopped the fraud overnight most luxury brands would go tits up in a year.
From your mouth to God's ear
Posted on 12/29/25 at 2:11 pm to Pragmatist2025
quote:
I agree. I actually don’t want to believe it is that much. That would mean that they are not just terrible stewards, but retarded-willingly-blind stewards.
It would mean that almost the entirety of deficit spending was fraud
Or put another way if the fraud was of this magnitude, our budget deficit would be small enough to where we might actually have a shot at balancing the budget
Posted on 12/29/25 at 2:13 pm to Powerman
quote:No one has the political, ethical, or moral will to do this.
balancing the budget
Popular
Back to top


1





