Started By
Message

Electric Vehicles

Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:18 pm
Posted by burger bearcat
Member since Oct 2020
8801 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:18 pm
So they are obviously hellbent on pushing these out to the masses. I was kind of laughing about the 2030 mandate for a new cars. But this looks like the way they are moving forward. frick those things. The overall impact on the environment has to be worse than a gas engine.
Posted by NashvilleTider
Your Mom
Member since Jan 2007
11331 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:21 pm to
Looked into getting a Tesla and our power company said the TVA grid can’t sustain more than 2 EVa on a street. This is their plan to shut the grid down and take control
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62355 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:22 pm to
2024 election will change all that IMO
Posted by Langland
Trumplandia
Member since Apr 2014
15382 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:27 pm to
Member these?



You'd be hard pressed to find one. Just a few years ago, they were trying to get every household to install these things. Then along came the led bulb. They don't last no where near as long as advertised and they fricking break too often. Give me the tried and true incandescent bulb. Pretty cheap and has a reasonable life span.

The point is, no one knows what tomorrow holds. Especially when we got these cock sucking "save the planet" politicians trying to steer the future of industry.
This post was edited on 2/13/22 at 10:33 pm
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110483 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

The overall impact on the environment has to be worse than a gas engine.
Except it's not
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
110483 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:45 pm to
quote:

Looked into getting a Tesla and our power company said the TVA grid can’t sustain more than 2 EVa on a street. This is their plan to shut the grid down and take control
This isn't true, zero chance.
Posted by burke985
UGANDA
Member since Aug 2011
24582 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:48 pm to
Almost every single one I've seen is ugly as hell, all of them. I only like the Tesla plaid and it's unattainable for the average Joe. I'm all for technology but we are not anywhere close to ready for an EV takeover. More like in 30 years and maybe not even then.
This post was edited on 2/13/22 at 10:49 pm
Posted by NPComb
Member since Jan 2019
27229 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:55 pm to
EV’s are not the answer and I’m a huge supporter. Everything in moderation is good. EV’s are not THE future. They are part of it but ICE will be dethroned simply because of politics. Lithium production is so harmful to the environment.

Splitting the technologies to include EV’s, ICE & HFC will be a wayy smart approach to 2050 tha. Trying to ram EV’s as the sole savior. The entire globe is gambling on it and it’s going to have negative impact on everything. Oil futures are sky high right now because engineers and economists both know that lithium is not nearly as abundant as fossil fuel but it’s way more harmful to produce. Ironic isn’t it.
Posted by LSU2a
SWLA to Dallas
Member since Aug 2012
2847 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 10:57 pm to
Is it your direct ties to the oil and gas industry that makes you this deluded or do you still attribute EVs to the left?
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45184 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 11:01 pm to
quote:

Looked into getting a Tesla and our power company said the TVA grid can’t sustain more than 2 EVa on a street. This is their plan to shut the grid down and take control


I own 2 Teslas. If someone told you that, they are retarded
Posted by joshnorris14
Florida
Member since Jan 2009
45184 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 11:03 pm to
quote:

I only like the Tesla plaid and it's unattainable for the average Joe.


There has been only minimal changes to the Model S since it debuted a decade ago. The Model S Plaid is almost indistinguishable from any Model S made post mid-2016
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
19262 posts
Posted on 2/13/22 at 11:25 pm to
I love my LED lights and no government mandate had to get me to buy them. They just provide a lot of light that is very energy efficient because they produce very little heat and almost all light.

Then too, there is that bathroom incandescent light that always went out when I got up to pee.
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16525 posts
Posted on 2/14/22 at 12:39 am to
quote:

no government mandate had to get me to buy them. They just provide a lot of light that is very energy efficient because they produce very little heat and almost all light.


Except EPA rules forced the phase out of incandescent bulbs. Also, LED's are nowhere near as efficient as they are touted to be, no as long lived. The LED itself might last 10's of thousands of hours in a laboratory but the driver circuitry barely lasts longer than good incandescent bulbs for all of the heat they generate. They produce far more solid waste when they burn out too.
Posted by LakeCharles
USA
Member since Oct 2016
5047 posts
Posted on 2/14/22 at 1:56 am to
quote:

This isn't true, zero chance.

You have zero fricking idea. 2 per street was probably their way of telling him in a way most people understand, two per local transformer. Every 3 or 4 homes share a common transformer that brings the 6KV neighborhood power down to 220V used in the home. These are relatively small transformers and can handle a limited amount of power. Power spreads out from where it is generated and there are a number of transformers between where power is generated and where it is used. Not only does the amount of power have to go up, but the infrastructure between the generators and point of use have to be upgraded too. Transformers, cables. My guess is charging two cars per local transformer at the same time will dim the lights in all the houses connected to the transformer whenever the air conditioner in any of the homes connected to the transformer turns on.

Posted by WeHaveTheBest
Member since Aug 2021
882 posts
Posted on 2/14/22 at 2:30 am to
Government intervention usually doesn't work.
Posted by Nado Jenkins83
Land of the Free
Member since Nov 2012
59558 posts
Posted on 2/14/22 at 3:12 am to
quote:

Except it's not


Except it is. they mine for nickel with electric diggers? Then transport the pieces by electric ship? Or does the nickel come from fairy farts?



This post was edited on 2/14/22 at 3:13 am
Posted by VBFlorida
Florida
Member since Nov 2020
1337 posts
Posted on 2/14/22 at 4:54 am to
:rotflmao:
Posted by JJJimmyJimJames
Southern States
Member since May 2020
18496 posts
Posted on 2/14/22 at 5:33 am to
A gradualist approach to the adoption of new technologies is always better than coercion as performed by government and quasi governmental agencies, who are ALWAYS wrong.
Posted by Alex777
Member since Jan 2022
385 posts
Posted on 2/14/22 at 5:42 am to
I couldn't give more of a shite about the enviorment. So far all I've seen about it is end of the world alarmism impulsed by the same kind of people of '' The science council will decide your fate'' as Fauci.

There are thousands of scientists who don't acknowledge that humans have an impact on the climate, but of course the ''pro science'' group who hates conspirationist theories, claims that all those who dissent form part of the oil industry's global conspiracy to destroy the world for short term profit. Because you know, the multi billonaires would rather spend all their money in a cover up of global scale, instead of just, invest a small fraction of that in monopolizing the renewable energy industry for themselves, since it already has a high barrier of entry in capital

I would buy one if they were a cheap way of saving money on gas, but they really aren't as of now.
This post was edited on 2/14/22 at 5:46 am
Posted by AUCom96
Alabama
Member since May 2020
4944 posts
Posted on 2/14/22 at 7:00 am to
quote:


Except it is. they mine for nickel with electric diggers? Then transport the pieces by electric ship? Or does the nickel come from fairy farts



There’s a lot of mining needed to produce batteries. Parts of Alabama are already being bought up towards that end. Plus the electricity will be produced by fossil fuels, more of which will be required. The grid infrastructure will need to be beefed up substantially I would suspect. Then there’s battery disposal issues, increased fire risk possibly using less clean generation resources to meet more extreme peak demand…

There’s pluses to EVs, but saving the environment has never been one of them.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram