Started By
Message

Election Watchdog Says System Allowed 600 Duplicate Absentee Ballots in Michigan

Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:33 am
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
44135 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:33 am
quote:

FIRST ON THE DAILY SIGNAL—An election watchdog in Michigan identified more than 600 cases of absentee ballots that were sent to the same voters at least twice ahead of the November election. Check My Vote shared the information with the Daily Signal from a statewide analysis, finding 668 ballots sent twice to people with the same name and the same voter ID number as of Oct. 1. In almost all cases, the individuals also had the same address. Of those, the organization found six cases of what appear to be the same person returning two ballots for the 2026 general election.


https://www.dailysignal.com/2026/10/02/election-watchdog-says-system-allowed-600-duplicate-absentee-ballots-in-michigan/
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99852 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:39 am to
quote:

sent twice to people with the same name and the same voter ID number


Why would the printer be printing moaaaar than one ballot per person hmmmm
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
92923 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:41 am to
We should figure out how that happens and make sure it doesn’t happen moving forward. Simply because it’s a mistake.

But seems like a nothingburger, especially with only 6 returning both.

Are we able to track when someone votes twice and stop it?
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99852 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:42 am to
quote:

We should figure out how that happens


It's purposeful.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
118210 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:42 am to
This doesn't happen. You are making shite up.

Sincerely,

Democrats
Posted by ReauxlTide222
St. Petersburg
Member since Nov 2010
92923 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:43 am to
quote:

It's purposeful.


I mean, maybe. But why only 600? This doesn’t scream evil plan by the left.
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99852 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:45 am to
That's just what has been uncovered so far. I do get your point however that 600 isn't the tipping the scale for a national election.
Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
13521 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:46 am to
quote:

I mean, maybe. But why only 600? This doesn’t scream evil plan by the left.


only 600 THAT WERE FOUND

Sacrifice a few so that dolts will think the system was thoroughly investigated.

That is scumbag 101
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
118210 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:46 am to
quote:


That's just what has been uncovered so far. I do get your point however that 600 isn't the tipping the scale for a national election.


So... not "widespread" voter fraud. That's where we are on the flowchart?
Posted by riccoar
Arkansas
Member since Mar 2006
5550 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:46 am to
SFP: "That never happened."
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
99852 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:47 am to
quote:

"widespread"


that word has become extremely subjective lately
Posted by Dawgsontop34
Member since Jun 2014
46857 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:49 am to
quote:

Are we able to track when someone votes twice and stop it?


Yes, and it’s a second degree felony (at least in Texas) if you do so.

Agree with you. Even though it shouldn’t happen, it’s more of a nothing burger based on what the system allows.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
31072 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:50 am to
quote:

Absentee Ballots


Odd that all Democrat strongholds have voting by mail / absentee / fraud.


Posted by RohanGonzales
Pronoun: Whatever
Member since Apr 2024
13521 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:51 am to
quote:

That's just what has been uncovered so far. I do get your point however that 600 isn't the tipping the scale for a national election.


Say what?

"George W. Bush won Florida’s 25 electoral votes by a margin of 537 votes out of 5,963,110 cast — a difference of 0.009% — the closest margin in any U.S. presidential election in history"
Posted by wallowinit
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2006
18378 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:54 am to
quote:

seems like a nothingburger

You are the problem.
Posted by Padme
Member since Dec 2020
10206 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:57 am to
quote:

In the TV show Ozark, Marty Byrde explains that Aunt Carlotta should be fired for stealing $5 because it was likely not the first time she stole, just the first time she got caught
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
14729 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 8:58 am to
Tip of the iceberg.
Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
25275 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:44 am to
The "system" allowed this...... yeah, ok.
Posted by loogaroo
Welsh
Member since Dec 2005
44135 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:48 am to
quote:

We should figure out how that happens and make sure it doesn’t happen moving forward. Simply because it’s a mistake.

But seems like a nothingburger, especially with only 6 returning both.

Are we able to track when someone votes twice and stop it?


Posted by lake chuck fan
Vinton
Member since Aug 2011
25275 posts
Posted on 10/6/26 at 9:49 am to
quote:

I mean, maybe. But why only 600? This doesn’t scream evil plan by the left.


600 here, 1000 there, who knows how often this occurs and in what particular areas. These "systems" should be regularly checked and rechecked to be certain this shite doesn't happen.
The Marxist Dems in the blue states absolutely know it's happening, why else are they refusing to allow access to their voter rolls?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram