- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:32 pm to Narax
quote:
In the UK, Labour has a massive majority with less than 34% of the vote
If there are only three seats, and vote goes like this:
Seat 1 Labour 34%, Tories 28%, Several other parties add up to 38% with none more than 15%.
Seat 2 Labour 35%, Tories 27%, Several other parties add up to 38% with none more than 15%.
Seat 3 Labour 33%, Tories 29%, Several other parties add up to 38% with none more than 15%.
Then Labour would win every seat and have 34% of the vote. There is nothing nefarious about that.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:34 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Will never convince me otherwise.
Morons are always sure
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:35 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Will never convince me otherwise.
Ok. Was never planning to do so.
For posters who claim to not be globalists y’all sure get worked up and concerned about elections in other countries.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:39 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Will never convince me otherwise.
Then you aren’t smart. Anyone paying attention saw this result coming. RN was never going to get an actual majority with 3/4ths of France’s political parties actively cooperating to prevent them from doing so.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:43 pm to BCreed1
two rounds elections are a fricking joke, elections should always be a one shot deal. 
This post was edited on 7/7/24 at 7:44 pm
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:48 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
For posters who claim to not be globalists y’all sure get worked up and concerned about elections in other countries.
What about globalists do you not get? Is it the world wide redistribution of wealth and world wide unlimited immigration?
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:49 pm to oldhickory1812
quote:
two rounds elections are a fricking joke, elections should always be a one shot deal.
Why? Plurality governance sucks balls.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:51 pm to Penrod
quote:
Then Labour would win every seat and have 34% of the vote. There is nothing nefarious about that.
Major issue there is that Tory cared only about London and Reformed split their vote
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:52 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Election stolen in France
This is an excellent prequel of our upcoming election in Nov.
What will our country do when the election is stolen again?
Will we sit back and obediently accept it (again) or will we demand accountability?
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:52 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Why?
because the second round gives the establishment a chance to buy everybody to make sure the outsiders never win.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:54 pm to oldhickory1812
quote:
because the second round gives the establishment a chance to buy everybody to make sure the outsiders never win.
It also allows constituencies to actually elect a representative with 50% + 1 of the vote.
But then again I prefer representative government over plurality-induced gridlock.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:57 pm to Figgy
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:57 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It also allows constituencies to actually elect a representative with 50% + 1 of the vote.
How naive can you be?
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:58 pm to BCreed1
quote:
What about globalists do you not get?
Concerning yourself to the point of being angry about France’s election makes you a globalist just to a different end.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 7:59 pm to Bobby OG Johnson
Blue check seems like a retard. The fundamentals of the election were known ahead of time, and were very predictable.
Only very dumb Americans whose entire exposure to European elections comes from random blue checks didn’t see this coming. RN never had a real path to a majority this election.
Comparing Euro elections to French parliamentary elections is nonsensical. Turnout and politics for it are completely different.
Only very dumb Americans whose entire exposure to European elections comes from random blue checks didn’t see this coming. RN never had a real path to a majority this election.
Comparing Euro elections to French parliamentary elections is nonsensical. Turnout and politics for it are completely different.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 8:00 pm to oldhickory1812
quote:
How naive can you be?
Not nearly as naive as someone who thinks 30% of the vote should win an election.
This post was edited on 7/7/24 at 8:00 pm
Posted on 7/7/24 at 8:01 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Native French
So... it's not France any more?
Posted on 7/7/24 at 8:08 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
Not nearly as naive as someone who thinks 30% of the vote should win an election.
If the the people of a country choose to not participate, it is their own deal, the people voting and gaining a majority of the vote, should win and get control of their government, a one round vote should be the universal way to declare a winner.
Posted on 7/7/24 at 8:09 pm to Adam Banks
quote:
Concerning yourself to the point of being angry about France’s election makes you a globalist just to a different end.
Your retort is shite. The guy simply pays attention to French election because he’s concerned about what is coming to America…the “canary in a coal mine” theory.
Page 3 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News