Nikki_T

quote:

---

I wanted to make a topic title asking "why" he hasn't done anything, but before I presuppose he's done nothing, I'll start by asking "has he" done anything?

---

‘I’m literally stuck in India’: US cancels H-1b interviews abruptly, leaving workers stranded back home


US cancels H-1b interviews abruptly

quote:

---

No way would Muslims let women and men intermingle at a bathhouse like that

---

Hungary is not predominantly Muslim.

quote:

---

It is insane.

They have control of the schools. That is where they are doing most of the damage. Covid allowed parents to see the garbage they are teaching the kids. Hope it's not too late.

---

Unfortunately, It's way beyond late. The Deep State had their claws in education for decades.They knew what they were doing when they creeped into brainwashing children through public schools aka Dept of Education. This is why those who can afford it would place their kids in private schools. Those who couldn't afford that luxury opted for charter schools, if they were available.

So glad the State Board of Elections is now firmly under Republican control.

quote:

---

Durham County Board of Elections Flips to Majority Republican
A Republican power grab of local elections boards this week flipped the balance of the Durham County Board of Elections.
by Justin Laidlaw
06/26/2025

Durham County Board of Elections is under new management.

Amid an overhaul of local elections boards across the state this week, Durham’s five-seat board of elections is now majority Republican.

State Auditor Dave Boliek promoted Republican David Boone to board chair, a position previously held by Democrat Dawn Baxton, who was reappointed to the board by the State Board of Elections Tuesday along with fellow incumbent and Democrat Pamela Oxendine. Republican Jim Weaver was also reappointed, and Natalie Beauchaine, who serves as second vice chair for the Durham Republican Party, was appointed to replace Donald Beskind, a Democrat.

Each member will serve a two-year term once they are sworn in on July 22.

https://indyweek.com/news/durham/durham-county-board-of-elections-flips/?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=6.27%20Caucus&utm_source=6839f50437&utm_source=The+Assembly&utm_campaign=75eedb1507-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2025_06_26_03_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_-75eedb1507-&mc_cid=75eedb1507

---

quote:

---

Am I the only one that laughs as in to think Epstein had a Gmail adress???

---

Yeah, those emails are sketchy as hell. Especially the disclaimer at the bottom. :rotflmao:

Does anyone know what they were ultimately sentenced to? I've searched the internet and can only find info up until they were convicted by a jury earlier this year. They faced 1-10 years in prison + fines. They were supposed to be sentenced on July 8 but I can't find anything after their conviction.




https://www.justice.gov/usao-nv/pr/jury-convicts-two-men-damaging-rock-formations-national-recreation-area-nevada

This case would affect states nationwide, like overturn CA Prop 50.
A ruling will come sometime next year.

quote:

---

The Supreme Court case Louisiana v. Callais concerns the state's congressional map, specifically the creation of a second majority-Black congressional district in compliance with the Voting Rights Act. The central question is whether drawing this district violates the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments by constituting an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The case will determine the future scope of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and whether states can create majority-minority districts as a remedy for racial vote dilution.
Background: Louisiana redrew its congressional map to include a second majority-Black district after a lower court found the previous map violated Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. A group of non-African American voters then sued, arguing the new map was a racial gerrymander.
Central Issue: The case asks the Supreme Court to decide if creating a majority-minority district, even if it is a remedy for past discrimination, is permissible under the Constitution. Louisiana's argument is that all "race-based redistricting is unconstitutional," according to the Brennan Center for Justice.
Legal Arguments: The core of the dispute is the conflict between the Voting Rights Act's requirement to prevent racial vote dilution and the Fourteenth Amendment's Equal Protection Clause. The case will explore if the VRA's redistricting requirements are limited by the Constitution, a question that could have nationwide implications.
Court Proceedings: The Supreme Court heard oral arguments on the case in October 2025. A ruling is expected to be issued by the court, potentially impacting upcoming elections and future redistricting cases across the country.

---

quote:

---

Everything that the government tries to make more accessible and affordable turns to shite becomes exactly the opposite of accessible and affordable

---

You're absolutely right. My healthcare plan thru my employer is great. No complaints whatsoever. Most check-ups don't even require co-pay. My friend has BlueShield thru Obamacare and she pays $50 co-pay for routine check-ups!

quote:

---

You went Saturday morning before 10am. It probably looked exactly like it normally does. No one with food stamps would have been shopping at that time. In fact Saturday morning is some of the best time to grocery shop specifically because you don’t have to deal with that.

---

According to Rush…welfare recipients wake up at 11am.

quote:

---

You may be a dim but you aren't a very good one.

---

You say that like it's a bad trait. :lol:

quote:

---

quote:

---

I'd like to know, who owns the land that is taken back.

---

I assume it would be auctioned off and proceeds to to whoever they took it from

---

You're right about auctioning off seized property/land. It depends on the agency involved, U.S. Marshals Service or U.S. Department of the Treasury.
I agree, it does get murky on where the proceeds go.