Started By
Message

re: Economist Peter schiff with a weird statement

Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:40 am to
Posted by PeleofAnalytics
Member since Jun 2021
4940 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:40 am to
quote:

Maybe you shouldn’t frick underage girls.

fricking creep.


Ahhh just the type of retard I was pointing out that can't grasp the difference between someone making a logical statement regarding definitions and someone being a pedophile.

You guys are so adorably retarded. Later

Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
3004 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:41 am to
quote:

This parameter you're speaking of has changed **drastically** in the last 30/40 years... hell, even in the last decade.


The law "parameter" of age-appropriate? Or the mind-set of, "Everything is Relative -- I'll just do muh thing"?
Posted by shinerfan
Duckworld(Earth-616)
Member since Sep 2009
28185 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:43 am to
quote:



Life expectancy tripled. People live past 30 now.



People have always lived past 30. Life expectancy went up when infant mortality went down.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
94093 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:43 am to
You pedos stick together thats for sure
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15048 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:44 am to
quote:

The law "parameter" of age-appropriate?


Yes.

Or no... actually, in my state, google says an underage person can marry with parental consent. Same as it was in 2000.
Posted by Grumpy Nemesis
Member since Feb 2025
2033 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:44 am to
quote:


People have always lived past 30. Life expectancy went up when infant mortality went down.


Shhhh

She's too stupid to know that human lifespans have remains largely unchanged and that life expectancy is simply reflection of the fact that more people die young to reduce the average expectancy. You can't expect an emotional count like that to actually think do you
Posted by JohnnyKilroy
Cajun Navy Vice Admiral
Member since Oct 2012
40361 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:45 am to
If you're ever talking to someone who goes out of their way to make the distinction between pedophiles and ephebophiles, there is a damn good chance you are talking to a pedophile.
Posted by aTmTexas Dillo
East Texas Lake
Member since Sep 2018
22857 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:47 am to
Looking up marriage ages in early British history (because they were civilized) women could marry at early age in teens. But generally they married older. From a developmental aspect women can have children at early ages. But our morality mostly prevents it. Now women don't get married until much later in their mid to late 20s into 30s. It may be a reason why birth rates are declining.

But his post while understandable is weird.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
3004 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:55 am to
quote:

actually, in my state, google says an underage person can marry with parental consent. Same as it was in 2000.


Fine. But what does the law say in your state about un-married Adults who engage in under-age sex? (and what is that age?)
Posted by deltadummy
Member since Mar 2025
1736 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:58 am to
quote:

He's not saying it's acceptable. He's focusing on definitions. Like said above, he's not wrong.


Still a weird way to prove you're smart.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
3004 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:58 am to
quote:

I do have a question. Did humans devolve or something in the last 200 years?


Yes.

I believe there's a documentary about it called, 'Idiocracy'.

Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15048 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:58 am to
quote:

Fine. But what does the law say in your state about un-married Adults who engage in under-age sex? (and what is that age?)


I tried googling that.. lots of unrelated results. Age of consent is 16.
Posted by EphesianArmor
Member since Mar 2025
3004 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:05 pm to
I guess in that case all we can do is rationalize a partner that at the fringe be considered "acceptable." (within reason)

(24 and under?)
Posted by theballguy
Member since Oct 2011
31971 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:06 pm to
Not a great over-share.
Posted by SallysHuman
Lady Palmetto Bug
Member since Jan 2025
15048 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

24 and under?)


That did pop up on my search... we were both under 24, so we're cool!
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
19659 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:10 pm to
Reminds me of that comedic skit. Peter is correct but it's not something worth dying over.
Posted by RollTide4Ever
Nashville
Member since Nov 2006
19659 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:12 pm to
It's like calling the 911 terrorists cowards. There's something insidious about lexicon abuses.
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
38063 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:15 pm to
By definition he may be correct but we, as a society, have deemed it wrong
Posted by CarRamrod
Spurbury, VT
Member since Dec 2006
58310 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:17 pm to
quote:


He’s not wrong
60 years ago these people where marrying and babying up these girls. Hell the East is still marrying girls under 13-14yo.
Posted by GoCrazyAuburn
Member since Feb 2010
39806 posts
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:18 pm to


This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 12:20 pm
Jump to page
Page First 7 8 9 10 11 ... 13
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 9 of 13Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram