- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Economist Peter schiff with a weird statement
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:40 am to dgnx6
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:40 am to dgnx6
quote:
Maybe you shouldn’t frick underage girls.
fricking creep.
Ahhh just the type of retard I was pointing out that can't grasp the difference between someone making a logical statement regarding definitions and someone being a pedophile.
You guys are so adorably retarded. Later

Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:41 am to SallysHuman
quote:
This parameter you're speaking of has changed **drastically** in the last 30/40 years... hell, even in the last decade.
The law "parameter" of age-appropriate? Or the mind-set of, "Everything is Relative -- I'll just do muh thing"?
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:43 am to 4cubbies
quote:
Life expectancy tripled. People live past 30 now.
People have always lived past 30. Life expectancy went up when infant mortality went down.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:43 am to PeleofAnalytics
You pedos stick together thats for sure
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:44 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
The law "parameter" of age-appropriate?
Yes.
Or no... actually, in my state, google says an underage person can marry with parental consent. Same as it was in 2000.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:44 am to shinerfan
quote:
People have always lived past 30. Life expectancy went up when infant mortality went down.
Shhhh
She's too stupid to know that human lifespans have remains largely unchanged and that life expectancy is simply reflection of the fact that more people die young to reduce the average expectancy. You can't expect an emotional count like that to actually think do you
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:45 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
If you're ever talking to someone who goes out of their way to make the distinction between pedophiles and ephebophiles, there is a damn good chance you are talking to a pedophile.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:47 am to HailHailtoMichigan!
Looking up marriage ages in early British history (because they were civilized) women could marry at early age in teens. But generally they married older. From a developmental aspect women can have children at early ages. But our morality mostly prevents it. Now women don't get married until much later in their mid to late 20s into 30s. It may be a reason why birth rates are declining.
But his post while understandable is weird.
But his post while understandable is weird.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:55 am to SallysHuman
quote:
actually, in my state, google says an underage person can marry with parental consent. Same as it was in 2000.
Fine. But what does the law say in your state about un-married Adults who engage in under-age sex? (and what is that age?)
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:58 am to AlxTgr
quote:
He's not saying it's acceptable. He's focusing on definitions. Like said above, he's not wrong.
Still a weird way to prove you're smart.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:58 am to Grumpy Nemesis
quote:
I do have a question. Did humans devolve or something in the last 200 years?
Yes.
I believe there's a documentary about it called, 'Idiocracy'.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 11:58 am to EphesianArmor
quote:
Fine. But what does the law say in your state about un-married Adults who engage in under-age sex? (and what is that age?)
I tried googling that.. lots of unrelated results. Age of consent is 16.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:05 pm to SallysHuman
I guess in that case all we can do is rationalize a partner that at the fringe be considered "acceptable." (within reason)
(24 and under?)
(24 and under?)
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:06 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Not a great over-share.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:09 pm to EphesianArmor
quote:
24 and under?)
That did pop up on my search... we were both under 24, so we're cool!
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:10 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
Reminds me of that comedic skit. Peter is correct but it's not something worth dying over.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:12 pm to momentoftruth87
It's like calling the 911 terrorists cowards. There's something insidious about lexicon abuses.
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:15 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
By definition he may be correct but we, as a society, have deemed it wrong
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:17 pm to Padme
quote:60 years ago these people where marrying and babying up these girls. Hell the East is still marrying girls under 13-14yo.
He’s not wrong
Posted on 6/6/25 at 12:18 pm to HailHailtoMichigan!
This post was edited on 6/6/25 at 12:20 pm
Popular
Back to top


1










