- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Dr. Phil talking about UFO’s over nuclear facilities
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:46 am
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:46 am
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. quote:
You're hearing this from me first. I was granted early access to newly released UAP documents, and one pattern jumps off the page: these objects have been showing up over our nuclear facilities for 77
years. Here's the record:
• 1949, Los Alamos: After multiple "green fireball" sightings near nuclear facilities, the military convened a scientific conference to determine if they were meteors. Dr. Lincoln LaPaz, the foremost expert, said no. They flew horizontally, silently, at constant velocity. The conference's greatest concern: they appeared most frequently over nuclear sites nationwide.
• 2015, Amarillo, Texas: A UAP violated the sealed airspace over Pantex, the heavily guarded plant where America assembles and disassembles nuclear weapons. Seen by multiple personnel.
The release also includes:
• Project SIGN's 1948 progress report, the Air Force's first formal UFO investigation, launched after Kenneth Arnold's famous 1947 sighting and Roswell eleven days later. Hundreds of cases studied. Rapid climbs, hovering, abrupt reversals, saucer-shaped craft.
• A 1948 Air Intelligence Study acknowledging at least 210 unexplainable reports.
• Hours of Apollo 17 crew debriefs on firework-like particles observed during their mission.
• FBI and CIA witness interview reports focused on national security concerns.
This isn't speculation. It's the government's own documentation, and you're seeing it here first. The nuclear pattern continues around the world today.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 11:50 am to hawgfaninc
Why is Dr. Phil getting early access?
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:00 pm to hawgfaninc
Refueling aliens ships, all is good
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:22 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
You're hearing this from me first.
This information has been circulating for atleast 5-10 years. Probably closer to 15-20 years.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 12:24 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:27 pm to FairhopeTider
Because they have to pad the blow and gain acceptance. Preachers, influencers, etc are going to be convenient for this.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:32 pm to Captain Rumbeard
quote:
Because they have to pad the blow and gain acceptance. Preachers, influencers, etc are going to be convenient for this.
We have also heard this for 20-30 years
Yet all we get are videos of blobs filmed with a potato
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:38 pm to hawgfaninc
Until we see some bodies, this is all bs.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:42 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Why is Dr. Phil getting early access?
Because nobody else is paying attention to this shite anyore
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:46 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Why is Dr. Phil getting early access?
He's pissed... up to now, amateur charlatans have been getting free reign & publicity... time for a pro to be involved.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:52 pm to hawgfaninc
Is his source the national enquirer?
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:58 pm to hawgfaninc
This is better than the official release.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:01 pm to FairhopeTider
quote:
Why is Dr. Phil getting early access?
Probably because he is a psychologist and their concern seems to be how well humanity's psyche will cope with full disclosure.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:03 pm to GoblinGuide
quote:
Until we see some bodies, this is all bs.
You are now pushing a grand conspiracy theory. Everyone is lying to you. Don't worry about those black helicopters following your car. It's just the government agent assigned to track your every move.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:09 pm to Dantheman504
quote:
This information has been circulating for atleast 5-10 years. Probably closer to 15-20 years.
I remember an Retired higher-up in the Air Force did a talk at Alabama when I was in school there around 1996 covering this exact thing.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:34 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:Which is how you know it's bullshite.
You're hearing this from me first. I was granted early access
Weird the timing on these releases as well. Hammmm.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:37 pm to hawgfaninc
Supposedly nuclear bomb tests beginning in the mid 1940s drew a bunch of UFO's to those areas where tests were occurring.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:42 pm to RolltidePA
I think nuclear probably shows up strongest on their energy scanners when they’re checking the universe for either (a) other sources of life, or (b) other sources of energy for their own damn selves because perhaps it’s an issue with other peoples out in space, or possibly (c) they know nuclear is really the only way known to us earthlings with which we can intentionally push our species into extinction, and they need us to not do that and stick around because perhaps they wanna confiscate our women and use them for reproduction vessels for alien offspring. Or even they could be maintaining or “farming” us as a promising new food source.
On a slightly more serious note, it could be for any number of reasons, but I have always found this phenomenon within a phenomenon (the notably higher incidence rate of folks reporting they seen em cruising around the nuclears, that is) to actually have a couple few possibly rational/logical/reasonable explanations. Which typically I’m a rather skeptical and cynical person. Over.
On a slightly more serious note, it could be for any number of reasons, but I have always found this phenomenon within a phenomenon (the notably higher incidence rate of folks reporting they seen em cruising around the nuclears, that is) to actually have a couple few possibly rational/logical/reasonable explanations. Which typically I’m a rather skeptical and cynical person. Over.
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 1:46 pm
Popular
Back to top

10














