Dr. Andrew Hill. The guy that killed ivermectin for clinical use against COVID.

Ivermectin is part of the Tijuana covid pak

Along with HCQ and Z Pak plus inhaler


Amazing

He along with a lot of others should be arrested and charged with international crimes against humanity.

The studies on ivermectin are flawed and scientist know it.

The reason is, the effectiveness of ivermectin depends on your viral load when the ivermectin is administered. They are always conducting these studies on patients with full blown COVID and are doomed to fail.

When you first notice you have symptoms you may have a viral load of 200 million for example, and ivermectin will work fine against 200 million viral particles. Or at least keep the numbers down sufficiently enough for your own immune system to recognize then kick in (3-4 days).

But if the viral load is 2 billion after 7 days from first symptoms ivermectin will only be able to take care of small portion of that viral load and virus replication is still out pacing your own immune response for really sick patients. Conclusion: ivermectin is ineffective.

In short antiviral MUST be administered early and there are more antivirals than just ivermectin.

It matter because they intentionally hid info and blocked access to treatment so that they could prolong the pandemic and stay up in their tyranny high horse as long as possible

I brought up a Ivermectin as a prophylactic a year and a half ago. I was told that I was crazy for even inquiring about it.

None of those connections is coincidental

This is why the majority of medicines should be OTC. Doctors and pharmacists should only be there to provide guidance, not dictate what medicines a person has the right to take. How many lives were lost because doctors and pharmacists refused to prescribe and distribute effective treatments? Every one of them has blood on their hands as well.

The guy sounds like a 7 year old who's been caught doing something by him mom...holy shite. He couldn't look more ashamed.

quote:

---

It matter because they intentionally hid info and blocked access to treatment so that they could prolong the pandemic and stay up in their tyranny high horse as long as possible

---

Sure but that’s the wrong fight to fight. Just like the vaccines being dangerous, not FDA approved, etc. frick that. The stance is we will not be required to take shots we don’t want. Same with guns. The only argument to be made is that it is our right to bear arms

If you give in to fighting the fights they want to fight, you will inevitably give up ground because you are giving credence to a weak argument.

My last W-2 wage check was September 8th, 2015. I'm also fit as a fiddle so there was never a thought of taking this therapy shot(s). I hate that people took this mRNA therapy on false guidance. It violates the Nuremburg Code, and people can't be "unvaxxed" once they get this therapy. mRNA has never emerged out of third stage clinical trials and its been around for a generation, and there will be long-term health effects unfortunately. Its already emerging slowly. I'm sensitive to this subject because my Mom died from side effects from an FDA approved drug that had been on the market for 12 years. Subsequentially taken off the market after a class action settlement.

I've taken a few ibruprofin and benadryls for allergies over the past fifteen years. That's it. Get out there and get in better shape. Just get some sun. If not you still have a 0.5% chance of dying from COVID, and the emerging mRNA shot therapy data is much worse.