- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Donald, I like where you're head is at, but veto the fricking thing
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:42 pm to hogcard1964
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:42 pm to hogcard1964
quote:
If he does nothing, doesn't it become law?
Yes.
Pocket veto is only applicable if Congress adjourns sine die, formally ending the session. With the Senate holding pro forma sessions they are never officially adjourned.
Last successful pocket veto was Clinton in 2000 when Congress went home for Christmas with a new legislative session starting in January 2001.
0
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:48 pm to theballguy
quote:
All it takes is one more Dem President and we are done as a country. Absolutely done and we may as well just stop discussing politics any longer if this happens.
Each side says that shite about the other side and have been for decades. Weird how it never happens.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:49 pm to SDVTiger
quote:
I think you meam tards not normies
Tomato, tomato
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:50 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
Oh for the record, If I am wrong, I apologize, but I don't think I am wrong
If you think I'm lying anyway why wouldn't I just lie and say you were wrong?
Such an odd interaction.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:54 pm to udtiger
I worked in this industry for 10 years.
And I just read through the housing bill and it actually doesn’t ban SFR/institutional investors from buying homes.
They have a “renovate to rent” exemption. As long as the buyer puts 15% of purchase price into the reno that property is exempt from the ban.
Or if the houses “do not meet structural or core system of local building codes” aka foundation work which every house in Texas could be argued needs it those houses are also exempt from the ban.
LIHTC and other affordable communities that consist of single-family homes operated as a single project will likely fall under the build-to-rent or renovate-to-rent exceptions Aka section 8 or work force housing. And the bill increases the number of section 8 units or 100,000 new section 8 units SFR companies could purchase.
And I just read through the housing bill and it actually doesn’t ban SFR/institutional investors from buying homes.
They have a “renovate to rent” exemption. As long as the buyer puts 15% of purchase price into the reno that property is exempt from the ban.
Or if the houses “do not meet structural or core system of local building codes” aka foundation work which every house in Texas could be argued needs it those houses are also exempt from the ban.
LIHTC and other affordable communities that consist of single-family homes operated as a single project will likely fall under the build-to-rent or renovate-to-rent exceptions Aka section 8 or work force housing. And the bill increases the number of section 8 units or 100,000 new section 8 units SFR companies could purchase.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 12:54 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
It's the poly board. People lie all day on here to make their point.
And my point was speculating that Trump might be hesitant to straight veto it because of public perception of the bill. Even outside of anything actually in the bill and whether or not people understand it or not, it has strong bipartisan support and Trump would be seen as the only obstacle to it being passed.
quote:
I would have to ask a larger sample size to find people who knew anything about the bill. So.... yeah, I don't buy for a second you have had lots of conversations with friends and colleagues about the bill
Maybe you just talk to a bunch of uninformed tards while I talk to the much more sophisticated slightly informed tards who haven't actually read the bill
This post was edited on 7/10/26 at 12:58 pm
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:24 pm to VolSquatch
quote:
Even outside of anything actually in the bill and whether or not people understand it or not, it has strong bipartisan support and Trump would be seen as the only obstacle to it being passed.
Now ask yourself, what have the Democrats ever supported that Republicans support, that’s good for this country ? The fact that it has bipartisan support from the Democrats in congress is enough for me to say, it should not be passed.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:25 pm to VolSquatch
I wasn't expecting a confession. I was saying if I am wrong I apologize. I also said, I don't think I am wrong. Not odd at all. Well, odd because nobody every apologizes on the poliboard.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:37 pm to TigerMyth36
It's odd because I laid out what I clearly stated was an anecdote and you come in with accusations of lying to support some narrative I guess? I really want people on this message board to think people like the housing bill (that I said he should veto, BTW) for..... Reasons?
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:38 pm to Jspaspa3303
quote:
Now ask yourself, what have the Democrats ever supported that Republicans support, that’s good for this country ? The fact that it has bipartisan support from the Democrats in congress is enough for me to say, it should not be passed
Where do you get the impression that I like the bill? "Hey, there are a number of people who like this" is an observation, not my personal opinion.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 1:54 pm to udtiger
Do whatever you got to do to pass the save act!!!
Posted on 7/10/26 at 2:47 pm to VolSquatch
And I stick by your anecdote is bullshite because almost nobody knows anything about the bill and you brought up friends and colleagues discussing it even though they aren't political. So I continue to say your story is bullshite. I don't have to propose a motive for your lie. Just calling out what is clearly a lie. Apolitical people aren't going to be upset and discussing the housing bill that the majority of the people in this country couldn't name a single portion of the bill. You say he will take heat for it. He takes heat no matter what he does. I retract my apology because I don't think I am wrong. Your initial statement was bullshite. You wanted to show that people are going to be angry because you've heard apolitical friends who are spitting mad about it.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:03 pm to TheOtherWhiteMeat
Doesn’t matter if he vetoes the bill. It passed with overwhelming bipartisan support in both chambers. He would be overridden.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:04 pm to udtiger
Veto the damn thing. Stop playing games.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:04 pm to udtiger
Getting a veto overridden would be worse than just not signing it, politically.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:06 pm to Bass Tiger
quote:If the dems did cheat in 2020 why didn't they in 2024? why didn't they every other year a conservative won? make it make sense.
Trump should not allow any legislation placed on his desk to escape his veto power. The SAVE Act is the most important legislation to a majority of Americans. If election integrity legislation is not passed we're going to be seeing the same shite as the 2020 GE times 10.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:21 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
I don't have to propose a motive for your lie. Just calling out what is clearly a lie.
Tards gonna tard
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:26 pm to udtiger
How about doing away with some of the unnecessary programs and spending before making new laws that won’t fix the problems.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:46 pm to TigerMyth36
quote:
My friends, colleagues and family are all political and not one has even mentioned the Housing Bill.
You are leaving out the possibility that he initiated the conversations.
Posted on 7/10/26 at 3:50 pm to udtiger
He absolutely needs to Veto the bill. Allowing it to pass by doing nothing means he is essentially approving the bill.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News