re: DOJ Again Refuses to Give Judge Boasberg Sensitive Information on National Security

quote:

---

Oh look SFP still hasn't found 1 out of the 90 or so cases against admin actions that he disagrees with

---

No I said the ones protecting removal of agency heads was valid.

There is some discussion about what limits Congress has, if any, on certain appointment scheduling on some posts.

Trump's admin is certainly making consistent arguments to make the Executive the most powerful branch, above the other 2. I don't agree with the philosophy, and I'm predicting many MAGA will not once they don't have the Executive (assuming Trump is successful in court)

If only there were another coequal branch that could check executive authority. I wonder which branch gave the executive this authority. Hmm.

quote:

---

do you believe he is entitled to this sensitive material? just a yes or no please

---

He’s asking them to answer when the flights happened, when the prisoners were transfered, where and so on.

these are things that have been discussed with the public, The judge asked for details on the timeline of events.

the judge also said if you’re going to invoke the state secret doctorine you have to explain why this specific information is a state secret.

people saying the judiciary is out of control ignore the fact that the administration can appeal every one of these decisions and then appeal that appellate’s courts decision.

That just takes too long and may result in an answer trump doesn’t.

We have a system. Trump wants to operate outside of it.

quote:

---

If only there were two coequal branches who could check such authority.

---

You're specifically arguing one of those branches is no longer "co equal" and is removed from being able to do these checks

Get your arguments straight. Congress checked the judiciary on the alien sedition act. The other search laws you're drawing false equivalency to are still subject to check by two branches.

quote:

---

Did you fail civics?

What is the role of the third branch of government if it isn’t to make sure the other 2 stay within their powers

---

Actually, no. Congress used its check on the judiciary as I've highlighted in depth here already for you. Maybe read that constitution. This one's tricky because an Article I check is actually found in Article III.

quote:

---

We have a system.

---

2 systems actually

a. the system used and abused when pedos are in power, which groomers overlook due to the end justying the means

or

b. the other system

100%

"Norms" led us to the US government having an official policy that men can get pregnant. I know that's a trope, but I really can't think of any more succinct way to note the absolute catastrophe that the NRO right oversaw when fighting the good fight.

Until the "norms" right can offer something better than "let us fight graciously with one arm behind our back and we'll try and lose as little ground as possible as slowly as possible" - they're going to be yelling into the void

does shareblue give you $4 every time you write the word "histrionic"?

TDA is literally a terrorist group. TDA operates in conjunction with Cartel de los Soles, a Venezuelan-based, narco-terrorism gang sponsored by the Maduro regime. They engineered armed takeovers of housing complexes in Colorado where people were kidnapped and tortured. A Colorado judge had to order the closure of one of these complexes due to the “imminent threat” to the public TDA posed. The Governor of TX declared TDA a terror group and lobbied the Biden administration to do the same. Their members are responsible for multiple high profile murders and kidnappings including the slaying of a Mexican border agent. Their MO is human trafficking, and political kidnappings like the 2024 kidnapping and murder of a Venezuelan military officer.

I dont give a frick if you dont think they are a national security threat. If you dont like it, become president and change the designation. Just don't come here and insult the board's intelligence with your gay liberal bullshite.