- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does the 2nd Ammendment really exist today in the way it was intended?
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:57 pm to burger bearcat
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:57 pm to burger bearcat
It hasn’t existed in the way it was intended since 1934
Posted on 6/17/23 at 9:58 pm to Jack Carter
Yeah but that whole State Militia thing didn't work at all in 1812.
One major purpose of the 2dA was so the US would not have a standing army. Madison and Jefferson were adamant that authoritarian governments stem from a standing army.
Madison's original 2A, which was actually his 5th amendment said:
...a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country...
But Patrick Henry objected to the word "country". Virginia's militia was also their slave patrol, and he feared if they were off fighting in some other state, the VA slaves could rise up and kill their owners. So it was changed to "State".
Eventually, Jefferson was elected POTUS, and put his money where his mouth was regarding a standing army. His peacetime army was cut from 5,400 to 3,300, and the navy was slashed to just 7 frigates.
Then Madison was President, and he convinced Congress to declare war on Britain. The army was ill prepared, the State Militias looked after their own territory, and the Brits marched right into DC and burned it down.
The US eventually prevailed, but went to having a strong standing army, although they didn't call it that.
So, I don't think the 2A ever existed as originally intended particularly since the whole State militia plan proved fruitless.
One major purpose of the 2dA was so the US would not have a standing army. Madison and Jefferson were adamant that authoritarian governments stem from a standing army.
Madison's original 2A, which was actually his 5th amendment said:
...a well armed and well regulated militia being the best security of a free country...
But Patrick Henry objected to the word "country". Virginia's militia was also their slave patrol, and he feared if they were off fighting in some other state, the VA slaves could rise up and kill their owners. So it was changed to "State".
Eventually, Jefferson was elected POTUS, and put his money where his mouth was regarding a standing army. His peacetime army was cut from 5,400 to 3,300, and the navy was slashed to just 7 frigates.
Then Madison was President, and he convinced Congress to declare war on Britain. The army was ill prepared, the State Militias looked after their own territory, and the Brits marched right into DC and burned it down.
The US eventually prevailed, but went to having a strong standing army, although they didn't call it that.
So, I don't think the 2A ever existed as originally intended particularly since the whole State militia plan proved fruitless.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:01 am to Obtuse1
quote:
If there had been a single grammar Nazi amount the founders we would at least know the actual original intent.
Explanation for you
Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:02 am to deltaland
quote:
It hasn’t existed in the way it was intended since 1865
FIFY
Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:03 am to Obtuse1
quote:
If there had been a single grammar Nazi amount the founders we would at least know the actual original intent.
We do know. The grammar of the time isn't a mystery to us.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:39 am to deltaland
Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:40 am to thejuiceisloose
quote:
Cite?
Read Federalist Paper #46
Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:43 am to LSUSkip
quote:
It's been 250 years. Nothing in the original constituion exists in the way that it was intended exactly. Our forefathers were smart, but they weren't time travelers.
Wrong. The constitution is based on principals that where learned over the course of time.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:47 am to Chinese Bandit Boy
quote:
The constitution is based on principals that where learned over the course of time.

Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:50 am to burger bearcat
The simple answer is no because the 2nd Amendment is part of the constitution, and the constitution no longer exists.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:51 am to burger bearcat
Have you challenged any of the "Red Flag" laws?
Posted on 6/18/23 at 7:58 am to burger bearcat
The second amendment is selectively enforced. Citizens cannot own the arms necessary to accomplish war with the government, which is what the 2nd amendment is for.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 9:46 am to burger bearcat
I'm pretty sure the framers never visualized the way the Second would be abused in our own time, with young men barging into school houses and Bible study groups brandishing and fully discharging military grade assault rifles on a defenseless crowd of people.
This isn't the America of 1789, folks.
This isn't the America of 1789, folks.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 9:52 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Having the guns but not having the guts to use them, pretty much cancels out having the guns.
The founding fathers were out cutting throats over a 2 cent tea tax. We are weak and pampered with no backbone.
Posted on 6/18/23 at 9:53 am to tarzana
quote:
I'm pretty sure the framers never visualized the way the Second would be abused in our own time, with young men barging into school houses and Bible study groups brandishing and fully discharging military grade assault rifles on a defenseless crowd of people.
This isn't the America of 1789, folks.
Lol there you have it from the board Marxist
Posted on 6/18/23 at 9:54 am to tarzana
quote:
I'm pretty sure the framers never visualized the way the Second would be abused in our own time, with young men barging into school houses and Bible study groups brandishing and fully discharging military grade assault rifles on a defenseless crowd of people.
This isn't the America of 1789, folks.
Don't forget how that pesky First Amendment is being "abused" in these situations, too.
This post was edited on 6/18/23 at 9:56 am
Posted on 6/18/23 at 10:06 am to DisplacedBuckeye
Tarzana wants the government to have all the guns, and unlike the church shooter in his hypothetical governments never use guns for nefarious purposes.
Right Tarzana????
Right Tarzana????
Posted on 6/18/23 at 11:04 am to burger bearcat
quote:Absolutely not. It was originally intended to apply ONLY to the fedgov. That is to say - explicitly - the states were free to regulate/ban guns as they saw fit.
Does the 2nd Ammendment really exist today in the way it was intended?
Many decades later, the process of "incorporation" of certain of the bill of rights began...leading to today's basically full incorporation (i.e. making it apply to the states as well).
This is one bit of major court activism the "conservative originalists" sure don't seem to mind!
Posted on 6/18/23 at 12:36 pm to Big Scrub TX
quote:
the states were free to regulate/ban guns as they saw fit.
So Jim Crow was legal? Hhhhmmmmm
Popular
Back to top
