0
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Score Board
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- SEC Score Board
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do you support Trump employing a "boots on the ground" policy/strategy in Iran?
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:42 pm to SlowFlowPro
No.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
OP doesn't contain an argument
It does.
"The purpose is irrelevant" is an argument.
Or at least a claim that begs an argument.
This post was edited on 10/2/26 at 3:44 pm
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:47 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
OP doesn't contain an argument
Lol, the argument is essentially:
“Do you support the United States deploying conventional ground combat forces into Iran?”
I've called you disingenuous before; this is no different.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:49 pm to ninthward
quote:
Lol, the argument is essentially:
“Do you support the United States deploying conventional ground combat forces into Iran?”
That's a question, not an argument.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:51 pm to SlowFlowPro
No. However, I don't think President Trump is planning to put boots on the ground.
I think President Trump is doing the troop movements to screw with the IRGC. Remember Orange Man Bad is a master 5-D chess player.
I think President Trump is doing the troop movements to screw with the IRGC. Remember Orange Man Bad is a master 5-D chess player.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
You know exactly what I meant. I summarized the substance of your post: you’re asking whether people support deploying conventional U.S. ground forces into Iran.
Calling it “a question, not an argument” doesn’t address the point. It’s just a semantic dodge.
Calling it “a question, not an argument” doesn’t address the point. It’s just a semantic dodge.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:54 pm to SlowFlowPro
Given your operative definition of “boots on the ground,” I suppose a 5 man SPECOP team seizing only a portion of Kharg Island pending the assumption of the task by perhaps a relatively small international security force…..that’s boots on the ground for perhaps a couple of weeks. Yeah I’m not going to lose my mind over “boots on the ground” in Iran.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
No. I don't support my tax money going to invade other countries and kill their citizens in general.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
I would rather glass the country than waste lives trying to invade and occupy it.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:55 pm to SlowFlowPro
No
I don’t want American blood spilled for mah isreal
I don’t want American blood spilled for mah isreal
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:57 pm to ninthward
quote:
You know exactly what I meant.
I have no idea what you meant. You didn't use words good, including "your"
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:58 pm to davyjones
quote:
Given your operative definition of “boots on the ground,” I suppose a 5 man SPECOP team seizing only a portion of Kharg Island pending the assumption of the task by perhaps a relatively small international security force…..that’s boots on the ground for perhaps a couple of weeks.
Sure if you didn't read. I'll do that for you:
quote:
So more than special forces/ops
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:58 pm to SlowFlowPro
No, you understood it perfectly well. You just chose to ignore the substance and pivot to grammar because that’s easier than answering the point.
Your post asks whether people support deploying conventional U.S. ground forces into Iran. That’s exactly what I summarized. Pretending otherwise is just evasive.
Your post asks whether people support deploying conventional U.S. ground forces into Iran. That’s exactly what I summarized. Pretending otherwise is just evasive.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:58 pm to AUCom96
Exactly what do you advise is your personal belief as to what would in your mind legitimately warrant relatively significant deployment of the American military? Tell us what and when it is ok to send the calvary, so to speak. That type exercise would give critical context to your currently vague position statement.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 3:59 pm to ninthward
quote:
You just chose to ignore the substance and pivot t
Correcting you is not a pivot
quote:
Your post asks whether people support deploying conventional U.S. ground forces into Iran.
Glad you finally joined the thread
Posted on 10/2/26 at 4:00 pm to SlowFlowPro
So we agree: that was the question your post was asking, and that’s exactly what I said in the first place.
The rest has just been you pretending not to understand it.
The rest has just been you pretending not to understand it.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 4:01 pm to SlowFlowPro
Alright, that one’s on me. So, counselor, what about a vast network of special ops teams, embedded all throughout the country. I’d suggest that to sidestep any label of “boots on the ground.”
Posted on 10/2/26 at 4:01 pm to ninthward
quote:
So we agree: that was the question your post was asking, and that’s exactly what I said in the first place.
This is exactly what you said in the first place
quote:
No, youre argument is flawed from the start; you are making an assumption that we will send combat troops, not logistics or policing.
There is no argument in OP
There is no flaw in the wording of OP
There is no assumption in OP
Posted on 10/2/26 at 4:01 pm to davyjones
quote:
So, counselor, what about a vast network of special ops teams, embedded all throughout the country. I’d suggest that to sidestep any label of “boots on the ground.”
I bolded words on purpose.
Posted on 10/2/26 at 4:02 pm to SlowFlowPro
As a conservative that’s voted for him 3 times, not no but frick no. And if he does, frick him and Bibi. This iran bullshite will cost republicans the midterms
Page 3 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News