- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do You Believe the Election Results Are Genuinely Fraudulent?
Posted on 6/10/22 at 11:25 am to Sulu
Posted on 6/10/22 at 11:25 am to Sulu
quote:Explain how votes can be reported as fractional (with decimal points). Think about how easy it would be to massively overturn an election if you have the ability to change the value of each vote from 1 to 1.5 or whatever you want.
I personally believe there was some amount of voter fraud but not to a level to reverse the results.
0
Posted on 6/10/22 at 11:27 am to Sulu
quote:
Do You Believe the Election Results Are Genuinely Fraudulent?
Emphatic YES
only a complete dumbass would believe the biggest retard in American government history received 81 million votes after never winning a primary for 40 years
Posted on 6/10/22 at 11:40 am to texridder
quote:Rescanning ballots (which were "mail in" but miraculously had no fold marks) all for Biden over and over for hours while unknowingly being taped by a security camera IS proof. That is clearly intent to rig an election. I could list ALOT more, but you already know don't you, you commie scum?
Fraud requires a proof of intent. So there can be no presumption of fraud.
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:10 pm to troyt37
quote:
How can you possibly have a huge vote jump for one candidate at 3 in the morning?
Which state was that?
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:13 pm to Sulu
quote:What formal investigation are you referring to? Are you under the impression the FBI looked at a single state?
AG Barr’s formal investigation
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:15 pm to Sulu
Do you think they were kidding about “by any means necessary”?
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:20 pm to Sulu
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:22 pm to texridder
quote:StateS
Which state was that?
AZ, PA, WI, MI, GA
Any other questions?
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:30 pm to Sulu
I find that 2020 being stolen is far more believable than the disproven Trump stole 2016 cuz muh Russians narrative.
This post was edited on 6/10/22 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:35 pm to Sulu
(no message)
This post was edited on 8/26/22 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:42 pm to xiv
quote:
There were more than 50 court cases confirming it.
i’ve asked this at least a dozen times to COMPLETE F*CKING IDIOTS LIKE YOU who come on here and regurgitate this complete f*cking garbage of a talking point --
Please show us one case where a court actually looked at evidence and didn't summarily dismiss it on fraudulent procedural ground.
Just one.
According to you there are "more than 50." So, show us one that even looked at the evidence so that people can make up their own minds.
This post was edited on 6/10/22 at 12:45 pm
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:44 pm to RandySavage
quote:
impossible to say.
It is quite easy to say - and beyond that it is unassailable.
There is not ONE rational explanation of what could create the series of grossly improbable coincidences that happened during that 4-5 hour period in precisely those five political districts that were required to overturn the enormous lead Trump had at midnight.
And - there has not been ONE attempt to 'show' how "secure and accurate" the election was. The entire effort of the DEM side has been to marshal ALL their forces = time - $$$ - influence - official power - influence - toward ONE single passion = and that is to STOP any kind of legitimate investigation into the events of those 4-5 hours or the planning that led up to it.
NOT ONE attempt has been made to SHOW just how "secure and accurate" that election was.
And any mention of it is treated as 'domestic terrorism' =
quite different that the DEMs reaction to the 2016 election = which they STILL claim was 'illegitimate' even after their "Russia collusion" claims have been undeniably PROVEN to be a planned HOAX.
You try to make sense of all that if you can - but you won't ==== only because you are afraid of the truth - as are ALL Democrats for the past 50 years. All they got are tired platitudes, unprovable threats, control of the "narrative" via their media cabal, and support of the worldwide "one world government" financiers.
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:51 pm to ChineseBandit58
quote:
there has not been ONE attempt to 'show' how "secure and accurate" the election was.
It’s seeing lipstick on your man’s collar and he says: “I don’t know what you’re talking about.”
Not even an attempt at explaining.
Proof positive that there’s something these Democrats are hiding.
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:54 pm to Wednesday
quote:
It’s seeing lipstick on your man’s collar and he says: “I don’t know what you’re talking about.”
It’s actually worse than that. They want to criminalize and throw you in jail just for noticing the most blatantly f*cking obvious case of MASSIVE F*CKING VOTER FRAUD this country has ever seen.
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:56 pm to Sulu
I don’t believe 81 million people knowingly voted for Biden.
Posted on 6/10/22 at 12:59 pm to Sulu
Yes.
I was still awake when they shut down the counts in those 6 states with Trump in the lead. Woke up the next morning and Biden was miraculously ahead in all of them.
I was still awake when they shut down the counts in those 6 states with Trump in the lead. Woke up the next morning and Biden was miraculously ahead in all of them.
Page 6 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News