Started By
Message

re: Discussion on Teacher Pay

Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:15 am to
Posted by 50_Tiger
Dallas TX
Member since Jan 2016
40079 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Damn... I totally miss read that.


My English teacher failed me. I need a comma in there

edit: it's actually supposed to be "more than."
This post was edited on 4/2/19 at 10:17 am
Posted by VermilionTiger
Member since Dec 2012
37577 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:17 am to
quote:


However, they don’t calculate the 1) the full hours that a teacher works, and 2) there are 12 more weeks that the teacher actually has to live.



Are you serious? You do know that MOST people on salary don't go home when they don't have anything going on right? And you know that MOST people on salary don't get compensated for working over 40 hours a week, right?

Salary is one of the biggest scams in the workforce for that very reason.

quote:

It isn’t accurate to calculate an hourly wage unless you use actual hours.


Dude, I probably worked close to 45-50 hours a week at my previous job and traveled a few days out of the month. I also didn't hop on the plane until 3 or 4 PM in the afternoon and went straight to work if I returned before 1 PM
Posted by CptRusty
Basket of Deplorables
Member since Aug 2011
11740 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:18 am to
quote:

you are not going to get the best and brightest teaching our youth


full stop.

Those that can, do. Those that can't, teach.

The private sector will always suck up the best and brightest first. No one wants to get paid $40k/year when they could be making $60k+.
Posted by Alt26
Member since Mar 2010
28333 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:24 am to
quote:

teachers are glorified baby sitters


That's not true. It's not an "easy" job.

However, their constant self-aggrandizing and complaints of being "underpaid" are exhausting and infuriating. Many teachers (not all) act as if they are the only salaried employees on planet earth who may occasionally have to work on a weekend or "after hours." Also, their pay is commensurate with the amount of time they actually work (which is approximately 9-10 months of the year). Plus, they NEVER consider the great benefits that are not always available in private sector jobs (great retirement benefits; health insurance, etc)

I know MANY teachers who "retired" in their mid-40's only to return to a full time teaching position in another system or private school WHILE collecting their retirement benefits. That kind of situation is rare in the private sector. I'm not saying teachers are wrong for doing that (far from it). But to not consider that tremendous benefit of their profession is ridiculous.

Finally, there are very few professions where simply just remaining employed for a relatively short period of time (tenure) provides you with significant protections from being fired at will. Many times poor teacher simply get transferred from school to school rather than fired because it is such an arduous and expensive process to fire them.

Make no mistake, teachers play a VERY important role in our society. But to act like they should be paid some exorbitant salary to do it is laughable.
Posted by Andychapman13
Member since Jun 2016
2728 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

That said, I think we should make the profession as attractive as possible to outstanding to outstanding professionals.

This might be the one time I ever agree with VOR. I think it has to be a simultaneous compromise: allow Principals to hire and fire at will and increase teacher pay like $10K to attract more capable, harder working candidates. And use testing not to hold teachers accountable, but kids. If the kid doesn’t pass exit exam at the end of every course they take every year, they don’t pass that course and have to take it again. And start it at like 1st or 2nd grade, that way a 6th grade math teacher doesn’t have to teach a kid on a 1st grade math level.
Posted by Haydo
DTX
Member since Jul 2011
2943 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:37 am to
quote:

The $1500 came with $2 million for private schools for special needs kids - which is a nice gesture but not enough.


Call me crazy... but why should a private school receive public funds?
This post was edited on 4/2/19 at 10:46 am
Posted by dcbl
Good guys wear white hats.
Member since Sep 2013
29668 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:40 am to
quote:

That said, I think we should make the profession as attractive as possible to outstanding to outstanding professionals.

we should, but what is actually happening is that teachers are getting squeezed and losing benefits

In AL, recent teacher pay raises have only covered the cost of rising premiums on health care

Our governor is also looking to raid the teachers retirement fund
Posted by anc
Member since Nov 2012
18048 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:52 am to
That’s why they are bitching and going all in for a Democrat.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14491 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 10:57 am to
quote:

My mother and my sister were both teachers, and, from my observation, they worked very hard and did far more than babysit, but there certainly are some duds in the profession.
That said, I think we should make the profession as attractive as possible to outstanding to outstanding professionals.


Good teachers are way underpaid and bad teachers are way overpaid. Problem is government and/or union rules make it difficult to align pay with performance.

Fix that, other problems fall by the wayside.
Posted by MeatCleaverWeaver
Member since Oct 2013
22175 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:00 am to
quote:

teachers are glorified baby sitters



I used to think similarly until my wife took a job (non-teaching) in the schools and began telling me about the stress teachers are under and how much they work at home after hours. Changed my attitude.
Posted by smoked hog
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2006
1819 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:23 am to
I think when discussing pay it is important to realize the discrepancy by state and district. At my current district starting pay for a BS is only 32,000. My last school was 10K more for the same teacher. As you move around the country there are some huge swings in pay, and that's ok. My cost of living is vastly different than a teacher in Cal, to say we should have the same base salary is ridiculous.

I also think that upper level STEM teachers should get paid more, but as an AP bio and physics teacher I'll admit I'm a bit biased. The local D1 university has graduated 1 chemistry teacher in the last 5 years and no physics. Supply and demand will have take effect unless you see wide scale adoption of online classes.
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
14824 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:34 am to
In my profession there is a lot of Truth to the old those that can do do, those that can't do teach.

It's not totally true, but there is more than a kernel of Truth.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:39 am to
quote:

Eventually, you’ll have School’s run by people that simply can’t excel anywhere else and took the teaching position because the school system is desperate for warm bodies. Right now, the majority of that group is comprised from the hard left.


Eventually? This has been the case in public school systems for 40 years.
Posted by smoked hog
Arkansas
Member since Nov 2006
1819 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:43 am to
One of the major problems is when looking at Admin from the top down. Department of ed if filled with former superintendents who are former principals who were former coaches. You have a lot of decisions and policy created and approved by people who taught health, PE and drivers ed. Quite a few PhD's who also have never taught.
Posted by Zach
Gizmonic Institute
Member since May 2005
112453 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:44 am to
Teachers of upper level classes ought to get paid more because it requires a higher level of proficiency in their subject.
If you put a 2.5 gpa graduate from ULL in front of a HS class of gifted kids there will be kids that know more about the subject than the teacher. And that's a recipe for disaster.
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37072 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Why are you bitching about making $26.25 an hour, salaried, when you are coming straight out of college?



The problem is not them making $26.25 an hour straight out of college.

The problem is them making $28.25 after 25 years, great performance reviews, etc.

There is no other profession out there, that requires a degree and a professional license, that so dramatically limits your wage growth throughout your career.

And before anyone says it... being a principal is not a promotion. The best teachers never want to be a principal, and most principals were only teachers for the minimum amount of time (in some cases, 3 years) needed to become a principal.
Posted by EA6B
TX
Member since Dec 2012
14754 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:47 am to
quote:

A popular conservative voice in MS asked yesterday if the problem with teacher pay was that a first grade teacher got paid the same as a advanced math or physics teacher.


quote:

Threw out the stat that for every first grade teacher opening, there are 10 applicants, and for every 10 high school math or science openings, there are 7 applicants, creating a massive shortage of qualified teachers.


This is pretty much true everywhere, in private industry the market solves such issues, which is why an engineer gets paid considerably more than a office clerk.

The math course sequence required to be a secondary math or physics teacher is almost the same as that required for engineering degrees. Those that have the aptitude to handle the rigor of those course are more likely to pursue a engineering or other STEM degree for the much higher lifetime earning potential.

If schools want more math and physics teachers the solution is simple, they have to pay them salaries competitive with private industry and not the same as 1st grade teacher.
Posted by BigJim
Baton Rouge
Member since Jan 2010
14491 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:51 am to
quote:

If schools want more math and physics teachers the solution is simple, they have to pay them salaries competitive with private industry and not the same as 1st grade teacher.


And unions and a government mentality get in the way of that obvious solution.
Posted by StPeteLSU
St Petersburg, FL
Member since Oct 2011
1938 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 11:52 am to
My father was a teacher and coach for 30 years before retiring. He got so disgusted when they became babysitters which is what they are. The school he was at was so bad near the end that the kids didn’t want to learn and he couldn’t discipline any of them. If they were sent to office they got sent back right away. Knowing my father I am sure he was lucky he didn’t discipline them himself. He retired and made more money working at the casino. The changes that need to be made are with the entire educational system first. Then maybe they can pay the teachers if they are worth a damn. And by the way he voted republican every election because even back then the Dems sucked. Didn’t like either tho
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37072 posts
Posted on 4/2/19 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

And unions and a government mentality get in the way of that obvious solution.


The teacher unions, especially in the south, don't have that much pull anymore.

But the government mentality? Absolutely, and here is why.

Let's say we went to a model that paid more based on merit and subject matter. Where does the additional money come from?

There is so much waste and bloat outside the classroom - all the assistants to the assistants at the central office, all the "data coordinators", teacher coaches, people who's sole job is to fill out government reports, etc. The bureaucracy is insane, and that's just typical of government.

Also, I'll say this about some jobs being harder than others - it's true. But part of that is because different teaching jobs require different skills. Teaching HS math probably requires higher-level math skills similar to an engineer, same for sciences, etc.

But teaching first grade probably requires skills more akin to a social worker. And while social workers are needed in our society, they get paid less than engineers in the real world so I don't see the issue in them getting paid less in schools.

I've also often thought schools should have teacher ranks - Teacher 1, Teacher 2, Senior Teacher, Master Teacher, etc. As you progress through those ranks, you should get significant increases in pay. A principal should be given X money for salaries, and he can decide if it's better to hire a master teacher or a teacher I for a particular class.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram