Started By
Message

re: Did Seth Rich Download DNC data on thumb-drive before his murder & FBI has 2 Seth laptops?

Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:50 pm to
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138920 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

Everything you stated is essentially false.
Well let's see. Here's what I said:
(1) They "literally hate" the fact someone murdered their son. . . . That's essentially false?
(2) The case has been buried. . . . That's essentially false?
(3) Seth Rich's parents "literally hate" the fact their son's murder is a cold case. . . . That's essentially false?
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4361 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:50 pm to
quote:

CNN may be hiring.


They paying good these days?
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167453 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:52 pm to
How dare you talk about this or the leopard!
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167453 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:53 pm to
What part of Alabama are you from?
Posted by TigerProwl24
Gulf Coast
Member since May 2015
4440 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:54 pm to
quote:

Sorry that a Ron Howard investigative peice about the internet internet doesn't quite meet your legitimacy requirements as HRCKilledSethRich.PatriotNews.Ru


Trust Hollywood and propaganda then. The Titanic was a love story.

Why not listen to unbiased and independent journalists who have covered every part of the story from day one, like Jimmy Dore?
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s dome
Member since Feb 2009
157845 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:54 pm to
They pay commie propagandists pretty well and have for some time. You’d fit right it.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138920 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

the leopard!
But Decatur's people would say it was a really, really, really, fast leopard ... and they'd hope you'd be too gullible or dumb to do the actual math.
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 4:57 pm
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26134 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 4:59 pm to
Seth Rich thoughts to ponder:

How would investigators know it was a robbery gone bad if nothing was taken? No one was around when Seth Rich was shot. It was only discovered that he was shot through the use of an automated gunfire reporter that DC has.

quote:

There is no immediate indication that robbery was a motive in the attack, police said, but it has not been ruled out as a possibility.


quote:

Rich’s father, Joel I. Rich, 68, said he believes that his son was killed after resisting a robbery in which the assailant got nothing — the victim’s watch, wallet and credit cards were not taken.


quote:

Rich was found shot several times, at least once in the back, about 4:20 a.m., after police were alerted by sensors that detect the sound of gunfire. ShotSpotter sensors drew officers to Flagler Place and W Street, a block from a townhouse Rich moved into two years ago with several roommates.


His assailants were close enough to "tear" his watch band (but not take it) and strike him repeatedly in the face. They shoot him in the back multiple times, but don't grab his wallet. Investigators take from that it is a robbery. Sure. How many robberies at gun point do you suspect end up with the robbers close enough to the victim to get in a fight?

quote:

"There had been a struggle. His hands were bruised, his knees are bruised, his face is bruised, and yet he had two shots to his back, and yet they never took anything," she said.


quote:

"We also know that there were signs of a struggle, including a watchband torn when the assailants attempted to rip it off his wrist," the parents said.


It is exceedingly rare for an unarmed victim of a robbery to subdue his assailant who started out with a gun. Get away, only to be shot in the back. I'm not saying that can't or doesn't happen, I'm saying that if it happened in this case, it would put this altercation in very rare air.

Why the lack of curiosity from our media regarding this peculiar fact pattern?
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 5:24 pm
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11847 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

$1 million for a suit like that is not so much money. Fox got off easy at that amount. Do you think lawsuits only settle because a defendant is guilty? The overwhelming majority of lawsuits settle because it is expensive as frick, especially a high profile one like that where they are seeking millions in money damages. It was way easier for Fox to cut their losses and resolve the lawsuit. That’s why most lawsuits settle, even a lot of frivolous ones. It’s expensive to fight lawsuits.


Fox retracted its story because they can't support it witih evidence. Also, I said ">$1 million" because the reporting was "7 figures", so it could be up to almost $10M.
Posted by Fells
Member since Jul 2015
4361 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:06 pm to
quote:

They pay...pretty well


That's great, I'll need to look into it. My Soros checks from posting on the poli board are pretty big but I'm looking to add another income source so I can buy all the super cool Trump digital trading cards.
Posted by WylieTiger
Member since Nov 2006
14680 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:08 pm to
What year is it?
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138920 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:08 pm to
quote:

TigerDoc
You seem to think you have something to contribute here.

Who at the DNC downloaded the data?

Why has the FBI covered up the fact the DNC data theft was an inside job?

What evidence rules out Seth Rich as suspect in that download?

Who murdered Seth Rich?

Why was Seth Rich murdered?
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11847 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:09 pm to
Posted by WylieTiger
Member since Nov 2006
14680 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:10 pm to
It was awful convenient that he was murdered in a spot that has no video surveillance.
Posted by LookSquirrel
Old Millville
Member since Oct 2019
7662 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:11 pm to
Soon?



Technofog

quote:

The FBI also withheld the contents of Seth Rich’s personal laptop, which it possesses, in its entirety, alleging the privacy of Rich’s family in “preventing the public release of this information” outweighs the public interest in disclosure.

The court rejected that argument, stating “the FBI has not satisfied its burden of showing more than a de minimis privacy interest that would justify withholding information from Seth Rich’s laptop.”

quote:

And, if FBI representations are to be believed, it also includes “details of intelligence activities, sources, and methods related to national security.”
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 5:16 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138920 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:11 pm to
quote:




You think the fack a kid was murdered and the FBI is covering up evidence is funny? You have an odd sense of humor chief.
Posted by therick711
South
Member since Jan 2008
26134 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Who murdered Seth Rich?


Great question, reportage originally suggested it could be two people.

quote:

Why was Seth Rich murdered?


Another great question. About the only thing that is certain is that the robbery gone wrong theory has very little supporting evidence. Look at crime statistics for armed robbery. They almost never occur at 4 am. The reason for that is that armed robbers don't hang out to assail someone at that time because there is very little traffic at that time period. Potential robbery victims also don't generally have on them at 4 am the types of things (lots of cash or valuables) that would make it worth risking the penalty that armed robbery carries.

Finally, if Seth ran, why elevate the charge to attempted murder or murder and then STILL not take anything?
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 5:13 pm
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
167453 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:12 pm to
quote:

Will y’all please finally go read the section on this in Mueller’s report? Or in the indictment of the Russians who did it. Pretty please.
"After the U.S. intelligence community publicly announced its assessment that Russia was behind the hacking operation, Assange continued to deny that the Clinton materials released by WikiLeaks had come from Russian hacking," the Mueller report said.

The computer security firm CrowdStrike had already published its technical report on the DNC breach, which laid out a trail leading directly to Moscow and the GRU. Analysts at ThreatConnect independently presented evidence that Guccifer 2.0 and DC Leaks were fictional creations of that agency.

LINK ]
CrowdStrike President Under Oath: No Proof of Russia DNC Hack--Aaron Mate, RealClearInvestigations May 13, 2020
Posted by NC_Tigah
Make Orwell Fiction Again
Member since Sep 2003
138920 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:14 pm to
quote:

CrowdStrike President Under Oath: No Proof of Russia DNC Hack
"Under Oath" will do that to you.
Posted by TigerDoc
Texas
Member since Apr 2004
11847 posts
Posted on 12/19/22 at 5:16 pm to
No, baw. It's funny to ask someone why something happened when it's not warranted to believe it did happen in the first place. It's an unsolved case and you're alleging a govt conspiracy that no law enforcement agency or legit journalism organization is willing to allege. You're just internet shitmilling.
This post was edited on 12/19/22 at 5:22 pm
Jump to page
Page 1 2 3 4 5 ... 10
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 10Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram