- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did JustIce Alito Kill Men In Women’s Sports Today?
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:32 pm to tide06
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:32 pm to tide06
quote:
They have to do this because any attempt to objectively describe what a woman is in legal terms would result in a politically unacceptable description for the left.
If the left had any sense they would take the L here and use it as an excuse to move past all the trans nonsense. Fortunately, I think they will triple down.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:36 pm to LuckyTiger
I wish a group of men that were very good at their sport, but not good enough for pro or college teams, would get together and break every women's record possible. Make it their goal to not have any real woman hold any record. Swimming, tennis, softball, track events, everything.
Then just sit back and laugh
Then just sit back and laugh
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:36 pm to LuckyTiger
If the Court rules that tras is not a protected class - and I think they will - then it seems like that will make it harder for blue states to continue to allow trans women to play in womens sports. It will become easy for a woman (a protected class) to sue a sports body/school district/state for discriminating against them by allowing trans women (not protected) to play against them.
That is why it seems to me the people fighting these two laws are arguing that some trans should not qualify to play in womens sports - that it should be a specific determination each time. Apparently, that was the status quo in Idaho before the law was passed (not sure about West Virginia.
Regardless, I find it hard to believe that this Court will find that trans are a protected class and that legislation targeting them should be reviewed with heightened scrutiny.
That is why it seems to me the people fighting these two laws are arguing that some trans should not qualify to play in womens sports - that it should be a specific determination each time. Apparently, that was the status quo in Idaho before the law was passed (not sure about West Virginia.
Regardless, I find it hard to believe that this Court will find that trans are a protected class and that legislation targeting them should be reviewed with heightened scrutiny.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:40 pm to SloaneRanger
So the premise is that a party with a base consisting of unmarried cat women, gay people, antifa, communist revolutionaries and Bond style globalist psychopaths is going to take the reasonable approach and admit they were wrong about something…?
People like that are never “wrong”.
They just assume the issue was that they need to do more of whatever they were doing that blew up in their face and find someone else to blame the mistakes on.
It’s a narcissism, incompetence and greed sandwich and they’ll die trying to force other people to eat it.
People like that are never “wrong”.
They just assume the issue was that they need to do more of whatever they were doing that blew up in their face and find someone else to blame the mistakes on.
It’s a narcissism, incompetence and greed sandwich and they’ll die trying to force other people to eat it.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:47 pm to LuckyTiger
The only thing you need to realize is you never see women trying to play in men's sports. We all know why.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:48 pm to SloaneRanger
Like another poster said Red states and blue states will come up with differing definitions and little Johnny/Joanie will be prohibited from competing against women in a Red state and the court will decide the true definition. Just pray we still have a conservative court when this is decided.
This crap is only promoted by dim-commies to destroy our country.
This crap is only promoted by dim-commies to destroy our country.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:49 pm to Chazreinhold
Trans Athletes have no place in men’s or women’s sports. Give them their own trans division. Allegedly, there are more than enough for that.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:49 pm to JimEverett
And in blue states, everybody would be good to go. The specific determination each time is nothing more than saying that somebody at the state level will gladly make that determination case by case and they will always rule in favor of it.
In my personal opinion, this Court can not allow that.
In my personal opinion, this Court can not allow that.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:50 pm to LuckyTiger
They should just grab Tboy, VOR, and Clark - “these are women now”
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:54 pm to Chazreinhold
quote:
I think he just did kill it. They still cant identify what a Woman is...
Cool. But, you KNOW that this won’t stop the honorable Justice Jackson from issuing a 38 page dissent that ends with “have a goot one”
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:13 pm to tigeraddict
quote:
Title IX was written in 1972. at the time it was written it was to protect women as defined in 1972.
If Title IX needs to include Men now calling themselves women, then Congress needs to rewrite Title IX accordingly........
Zero downvotes. This is why i dont take this place as seriously. Stop using dumb arguments because they sound good.
" the 2nd amendment was ratified in 1791 for arms as defined in 1791. If the second amendment needs to include modern arms then congress needs to rewrite the 2nd amendment accordingly"
See how dumb that is when you dont have blinders on?
Federally define sex and gender. That's it. Nothing needs to be re written.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:14 pm to Chazreinhold
In 2025 a frickin lawyer doesntknow what it means to be a man. Shoulda asked if a man can get pregnant
This country is nearing a tipping point when it blows you not gonna find thes fricks
This country is nearing a tipping point when it blows you not gonna find thes fricks
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 6:29 pm
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:17 pm to Chazreinhold
I’m so embarrassed to be an American sometimes that this would even make it to USSC 
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:20 pm to LuckyTiger
If trans women were really women they wouldn't need the prefix "trans". They would just be *women*. The simple fact that they are "trans women" indicates that are different than/not the same as "women"
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:24 pm to LuckyTiger
“
quote:imagine trying to honestly argue this with a straight face
And what is the definition of a woman?”
“You would have to understand what they meant when they used those terms to figure out whether someone was excluded.”
“And what is that definition?”
“We don’t have a definition for the Court. We’re not taking issue with the definition we’re saying it excludes people in the way it is applied and there’s a subset of birthed males where it doesn’t make sense to do so in the state’s interest.”
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:25 pm to dgnx6
quote:
No one cares about this child abuse.
groomers care and are desperate for it to continue.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:26 pm to Great Plains Drifter
quote:
The Left is so completely batshite ate-up with politics and their “progressive” agenda, they’ve twisted themselves mentally into not even being able to rationally make a coherent case for getting from point A to point B.
The demprogs are going to take the dem party down the toilet.
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:45 pm to LuckyTiger
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:48 pm to LuckyTiger
I can't believe something so fricking idiotic made it all the way to the SCOTUS.
Keeping men out of women's sports needed the SCOTUS to tell the US populace ......HELL NO MEN ARE NO COMPETING IN WOMEN'S SPORTS!!!
Keeping men out of women's sports needed the SCOTUS to tell the US populace ......HELL NO MEN ARE NO COMPETING IN WOMEN'S SPORTS!!!
Popular
Back to top


2








