Started By
Message

re: Did JustIce Alito Kill Men In Women’s Sports Today?

Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:32 pm to
Posted by SloaneRanger
Upper Hurstville
Member since Jan 2014
13780 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:32 pm to
quote:

They have to do this because any attempt to objectively describe what a woman is in legal terms would result in a politically unacceptable description for the left.


If the left had any sense they would take the L here and use it as an excuse to move past all the trans nonsense. Fortunately, I think they will triple down.
Posted by jeffsdad
Member since Mar 2007
24872 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:36 pm to
I wish a group of men that were very good at their sport, but not good enough for pro or college teams, would get together and break every women's record possible. Make it their goal to not have any real woman hold any record. Swimming, tennis, softball, track events, everything.

Then just sit back and laugh
Posted by JimEverett
Member since May 2020
2402 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:36 pm to
If the Court rules that tras is not a protected class - and I think they will - then it seems like that will make it harder for blue states to continue to allow trans women to play in womens sports. It will become easy for a woman (a protected class) to sue a sports body/school district/state for discriminating against them by allowing trans women (not protected) to play against them.

That is why it seems to me the people fighting these two laws are arguing that some trans should not qualify to play in womens sports - that it should be a specific determination each time. Apparently, that was the status quo in Idaho before the law was passed (not sure about West Virginia.

Regardless, I find it hard to believe that this Court will find that trans are a protected class and that legislation targeting them should be reviewed with heightened scrutiny.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
23315 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:40 pm to
So the premise is that a party with a base consisting of unmarried cat women, gay people, antifa, communist revolutionaries and Bond style globalist psychopaths is going to take the reasonable approach and admit they were wrong about something…?

People like that are never “wrong”.

They just assume the issue was that they need to do more of whatever they were doing that blew up in their face and find someone else to blame the mistakes on.

It’s a narcissism, incompetence and greed sandwich and they’ll die trying to force other people to eat it.
Posted by Tigergreg
Metairie
Member since Feb 2005
26096 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:47 pm to
The only thing you need to realize is you never see women trying to play in men's sports. We all know why.
Posted by geoag58
Member since Nov 2011
2122 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:48 pm to
Like another poster said Red states and blue states will come up with differing definitions and little Johnny/Joanie will be prohibited from competing against women in a Red state and the court will decide the true definition. Just pray we still have a conservative court when this is decided.

This crap is only promoted by dim-commies to destroy our country.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
38468 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:49 pm to
Trans Athletes have no place in men’s or women’s sports. Give them their own trans division. Allegedly, there are more than enough for that.
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
55619 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:49 pm to
And in blue states, everybody would be good to go. The specific determination each time is nothing more than saying that somebody at the state level will gladly make that determination case by case and they will always rule in favor of it.

In my personal opinion, this Court can not allow that.

Posted by rocksteady
Member since Sep 2013
2950 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:50 pm to
They should just grab Tboy, VOR, and Clark - “these are women now”
Posted by OccamsStubble
Member since Aug 2019
10082 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 5:54 pm to
quote:

I think he just did kill it. They still cant identify what a Woman is...


Cool. But, you KNOW that this won’t stop the honorable Justice Jackson from issuing a 38 page dissent that ends with “have a goot one”
Posted by Gusoline
Jacksonville, NC
Member since Dec 2013
10935 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:13 pm to
quote:

Title IX was written in 1972. at the time it was written it was to protect women as defined in 1972.

If Title IX needs to include Men now calling themselves women, then Congress needs to rewrite Title IX accordingly........


Zero downvotes. This is why i dont take this place as seriously. Stop using dumb arguments because they sound good.

" the 2nd amendment was ratified in 1791 for arms as defined in 1791. If the second amendment needs to include modern arms then congress needs to rewrite the 2nd amendment accordingly"

See how dumb that is when you dont have blinders on?

Federally define sex and gender. That's it. Nothing needs to be re written.
Posted by ole man
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2007
18024 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:14 pm to
In 2025 a frickin lawyer doesntknow what it means to be a man. Shoulda asked if a man can get pregnant

This country is nearing a tipping point when it blows you not gonna find thes fricks
This post was edited on 1/13/26 at 6:29 pm
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
96959 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:17 pm to
I’m so embarrassed to be an American sometimes that this would even make it to USSC
Posted by Smeg
Member since Aug 2018
15533 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:20 pm to
If trans women were really women they wouldn't need the prefix "trans". They would just be *women*. The simple fact that they are "trans women" indicates that are different than/not the same as "women"
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
150335 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

And what is the definition of a woman?”

“You would have to understand what they meant when they used those terms to figure out whether someone was excluded.”

“And what is that definition?”

“We don’t have a definition for the Court. We’re not taking issue with the definition we’re saying it excludes people in the way it is applied and there’s a subset of birthed males where it doesn’t make sense to do so in the state’s interest.”
imagine trying to honestly argue this with a straight face
Posted by uggabugga
Maryland
Member since Aug 2024
4454 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:25 pm to
quote:

No one cares about this child abuse.

groomers care and are desperate for it to continue.
Posted by Auburn1968
NYC
Member since Mar 2019
26491 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:26 pm to
quote:

The Left is so completely batshite ate-up with politics and their “progressive” agenda, they’ve twisted themselves mentally into not even being able to rationally make a coherent case for getting from point A to point B.


The demprogs are going to take the dem party down the toilet.
Posted by L.A.
The Mojave Desert
Member since Aug 2003
66645 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:45 pm to
Posted by Bass Tiger
Member since Oct 2014
55738 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:48 pm to
I can't believe something so fricking idiotic made it all the way to the SCOTUS.

Keeping men out of women's sports needed the SCOTUS to tell the US populace ......HELL NO MEN ARE NO COMPETING IN WOMEN'S SPORTS!!!
Posted by Jbird
Shoot the tires out!
Member since Oct 2012
90572 posts
Posted on 1/13/26 at 6:51 pm to
This idiot now knows?
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram