- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Did Cheif Justice Roberts just wade into the waters on Boasberg?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:58 am to BCreed1
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:58 am to BCreed1
System people are all about preserving and protecting the system.
Doesn’t matter if the system itself has become rotten to the core.
Roberts is a system guy.
Doesn’t matter if the system itself has become rotten to the core.
Roberts is a system guy.
0
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:59 am to Boss
quote:
Executive branch does not have carte blanche because they won an election.
Judicial Branch doesn't have carte blanche because they do not like who was elected President...
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:59 am to Boss
quote:
And this boys and girls is why we have separation of powers and checks and balances. When 1 branch becomes unhinged, you need the others to check it.
The president cannot impeach a judge himself. Trump saying that a judge SHOULD be impeached has nothing to do with separation of powers or of checks and balances.
There is nothing to "check" based on verbiage. This is no different than when a member of congress says that Trump should be removed from office, or arrested or worse -- which happens almost every day.
For some reason we give judges more reverence than actual elected officials.
This post was edited on 3/18/25 at 12:10 pm
Posted on 3/18/25 at 11:59 am to BCreed1
I agree with President Trump ignoring Boasberg’s “order” and deporting the gang members.
I also agree with Roberts that Presidents shouldn’t just be able to impeach judges they disagree with.
Should President have been allowed to impeach the Federal judge who told him his administration had to hold Federal oil lease sales?
Are with good with (God forbid) President Gavin Newsom throwing conservative Federal judges off the bench?
I also agree with Roberts that Presidents shouldn’t just be able to impeach judges they disagree with.
Should President have been allowed to impeach the Federal judge who told him his administration had to hold Federal oil lease sales?
Are with good with (God forbid) President Gavin Newsom throwing conservative Federal judges off the bench?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:00 pm to BCreed1
Did Roberts just put that out there in a social media post of his own impetus or was he asked about?
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:00 pm to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
The president cannot impeach of judge himself. Trump saying that a judge SHOULD be impeached has nothing to do with separation of powers or of checks and balances.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:02 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
President Gavin Newsom throwing conservative Federal judges off the bench?
Last I checked it is not how the process works, so your panties being in a wad is over nothing...
Congress CAN start impeachment proceedings for judges that have done wrong and repeatedly overstepped their bounds... The case can be made that this nutjob judge has done much more...
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:02 pm to Boss
quote:
Executive branch does not have carte blanche because they won an election.
Carte Blanche means blank check, right?
What blank check do you think Trump is using, exactly?
What he IS using was written, voted upon, signed, sealed and delivered under previous office holders across congress, the senate and the executive.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:03 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts just fired back at Trump
Maybe, but I think his statement is also a subtle warning for these rogue US District judges.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:04 pm to BCreed1
quote:paid for by USAID
POLITICO
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:04 pm to The Maj
quote:
Congress CAN start impeachment proceedings for judges that have done wrong and repeatedly overstepped their bounds
I’m good starting there. I’ll give the President and Congress my permission.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:04 pm to Jbird
Separation of powers is working.
Judicial branch checks the activity of the executive.
The executive appeals to the legislative to due the potential political bias of said judicial branch representative.
Legislative branch decides to impeach or not.
Meanwhile, appellate judge in judicial branch corrects or upholds its own.
Executive deals with the outcome.
Judicial branch checks the activity of the executive.
The executive appeals to the legislative to due the potential political bias of said judicial branch representative.
Legislative branch decides to impeach or not.
Meanwhile, appellate judge in judicial branch corrects or upholds its own.
Executive deals with the outcome.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:08 pm to BCreed1
quote:
For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision
Ok...but is it a legal option?? Lefties have thrown centuries of precedent out the door, so here you go Roberts.
Gawd I wish Trump would "nudge" him into retirement. We need a legit chief justices.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:09 pm to ragincajun03
What? The president does not have that power. This is something Congress DOES have the power to do under our Constitution.
So your premise is wrong.
So your premise is wrong.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:12 pm to BCreed1
Well start calling up these rediculous cases and over turning them. POTUS has clear powers to deport ANY illegal aliens. Especially, these thugs.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:12 pm to BCreed1
quote:
"For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision. The normal appellate review process exists for that purpose."
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:14 pm to ragincajun03
quote:
I also agree with Roberts that Presidents shouldn’t just be able to impeach judges they disagree with
I completely disagree. It’s all a political process. If the people don’t agree or support the president or member of congress, the political remedy is to vote them out. If Congress and the president don’t like the conduct of a judicial appointee, then impeach them and vote them out if you can overcome a 2/3’s majority to do so. Democracy works when everyone’s feet are held to the fire including judges. IMO it would force the judiciary to interpret the law and away from this ridiculous legislating from the bench advocacy that many feel they are entitled to do.
John Roberts is the biggest clown of all when he exposed himself by proclaiming Obamacare was simply a tax and therefore legal. In a just world he should have been immediately impeached, stripped of his robe and ran out of town in shame for that ridiculous ruling. The guy can frick right off because he deserves every single ounce of criticism that comes his way.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:15 pm to BCreed1
Chief Justice Roberts and Boasberg are thick as thieves.
Has Chief Justice ever opined about the FISA court abuses? Even after Obama got a 99 page dress down? I think not.
I think Roberts wants a judicial crisis.
This is what I was afraid of. Mike is usually not like this...
Has Chief Justice ever opined about the FISA court abuses? Even after Obama got a 99 page dress down? I think not.
I think Roberts wants a judicial crisis.
This is what I was afraid of. Mike is usually not like this...
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here. Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:16 pm to BCreed1
And for over two centuries we didn’t go after political opponents via judiciary.
Posted on 3/18/25 at 12:19 pm to BCreed1
Roberts is correct. You can't impeach a federal judge simply because you don't like his ruling. That's something a Democrat would do.
Page 2 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News