
- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:09 pm to MyMardiGrasHat
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:09 pm to MyMardiGrasHat
quote:
Bro, this is Eric Dougherty!
I mean, you could play the video and listen to it straight from the source.
Why are so many people so frickin retarded?
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:10 pm to BoarEd
quote:
and listen to it straight from the source.
The source does not say this
quote:
DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud
just FYI
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:11 pm to BoarEd
Thune knows and is why he stonewalled
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:12 pm to BoarEd
Grab those voters and deport IMMEDIATELY and the whole rigged vote/ballot harvesting mechanism crashes. At least temporarily. Albeit many of those voters likely didn’t even know if or who they ‘voted’ for.
The Supreme Court owns this crap. There are “sins of commission and sins of omission “. Guilty as charged.
Compassion and mercy for the World’s poor is another argument. Qualifiers for mercy is the rule. In Heaven (assuming such exists) and in Earth. Break the Rule and it all goes to hell.
The Supreme Court owns this crap. There are “sins of commission and sins of omission “. Guilty as charged.
Compassion and mercy for the World’s poor is another argument. Qualifiers for mercy is the rule. In Heaven (assuming such exists) and in Earth. Break the Rule and it all goes to hell.
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:14 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The source does not say this
quote:
DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud
just FYI
Now it's time for the clown spin apparently. Yes, he does say exactly that. Specifically he says, "we have 1,600 cases of voter fraud ongoing and 300,000 more we are getting to."
When you call for a clown, expect a circus.
This post was edited on 9/30/26 at 12:15 pm
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:16 pm to BoarEd
quote:
Now it's time for the clown spin apparently. Yes, he does say exactly that. S
quote:
Over 1,600 voter fraud cases currently investigating and 300,000 MORE WE'RE GETTING TO
Investigating 1600 doesn't mean that all of that 1600 will be cases of voter frauce
They haven't even begun investigating the 300k to determine if they are actual cases of voter fraud
How can they determine voter fraud prior to investigating?
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:17 pm to BoarEd
Why not commit voter fraud?
If you win, you get to obstruct the process of investigating the fraud and grease the rails for more fraud in the future.
95% of the media and 50% of the political and judicial apparatus (95% in areas where fraud is most likely to occur) is pot-committed to the belief that voter fraud doesn't exist and any attempts to illustrate the contrary is a "threat to democracy".
Even under the best, most ideal circumstances (non fraud candidate wins, ample resources are dedicated to exposing the fraud and irrefutable proof is found), it still takes YEARS to navigate all of this at which point the damage was done. There is no conceivable way to unravel and litigate this mess in the 50 days between an election and swearing in.
Why play by the rules when the game is rigged and you can't change the outcome anyway?
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:19 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
In the statement he says they're only actually investigating 1600 so far
In other words, it's so much that they have the manpower to investigate only a small portion yet the prior administration and its supporters have stated time and again our elections are secure (thus requiring IDs must be "ray-cis").
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:20 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Investigating 1600 doesn't mean that all of that 1600 will be cases of voter frauce
They haven't even begun investigating the 300k to determine if they are actual cases of voter fraud
How can they determine voter fraud prior to investigating?
For fricks sake, you pedantic, obtuse motherjiver. Did I say that these cases will be proven instances of voter fraud? No, I didn't. But that doesn't change the fact that they have a current workload of 1,600 cases with a backlog of 300,000 more.
And you frickin know this too, you g-damn clown. Get the frick out of here with this nonsense.
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:21 pm to BoarEd
Until there are arrests, it's lip service
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:26 pm to udtiger
quote:
Until there are arrests, it's lip service
In regards to this here, how can any one agency be expected to handle a caseload like this? This presents a much larger issue, imo. Especially in regards to how they treat the upcoming midterm elections. This presents a pretty clear and present danger to our country. It should be treated as such. It'll be years before this shite is resolved.
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:29 pm to Bard
quote:
In other words, it's so much that they have the manpower to investigate only a small portion yet the prior administration and its supporters have stated time and again our elections are secure (thus requiring IDs must be "ray-cis").
We don't have any evidence to make this conclusion, either.
He didn't give anything worth making any judgments
Are these simply citizens registered in two states? Illegals on voter rolls? We don't know
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:30 pm to BoarEd
quote:
So now the Trump admin is cross-checking names and finding MORE FRAUD THAN EXPECTED
More fraud than who expected? I honestly don't believe a single state other than Minnesota has been blue since the 1980s.
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:31 pm to BoarEd
quote:
For fricks sake, you pedantic, obtuse motherjiver. Did I say that these cases will be proven instances of voter fraud?
You said
quote:
I mean, you could play the video and listen to it straight from the source.
I said
quote:
The source does not say this
quote:
DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud
just FYI
Now you say
quote:
. Did I say that these cases will be proven instances of voter fraud? No, I didn't. But that doesn't change the fact that they have a current workload of 1,600 cases with a backlog of 300,000 more.
Now you agree with my original comment.
The source does NOT say this
quote:
DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud
It's 300k in a backlog queue which haven't been determined to be cases of voter fraud
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:32 pm to BoarEd
quote:
In regards to this here, how can any one agency be expected to handle a caseload like this?
Follow the example of the January 6 riots
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:34 pm to SlowFlowPro
It doesn't matter how you try to parse it, you're wrong. They have 300,000 cases of voter fraud they're working on.
It's not possible that you don't understand this.
It's not possible that you don't understand this.
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:35 pm to BoarEd
Until people are arrested and held accountable, I don’t care about what they found
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:36 pm to BoarEd
NUH UH!!!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!
NO PROOF!!!!! MAGA CONSPIRACY!!!! MOST SECURE ELECTION IN HISTORY!!!!! BIG LIE!!!!! BASELESS CLAIMS!!!!
- TDS figs
NO PROOF!!!!! MAGA CONSPIRACY!!!! MOST SECURE ELECTION IN HISTORY!!!!! BIG LIE!!!!! BASELESS CLAIMS!!!!
- TDS figs
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:38 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
direct, credible evidence
The standard tightens.
It used to be "evidence." Then it became "direct evidence." Now it's "direct, credible evidence."
What's next? Let's see. How 'bout "direct, credible, double eye-witnessed by NASA QA, filmed, time-stamped, fingerprinted, DNA-sampled evidence."

Popular
Back to top


1










