Started By
Message

re: DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud

Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:09 pm to
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44116 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:09 pm to
quote:

Bro, this is Eric Dougherty!


I mean, you could play the video and listen to it straight from the source.

Why are so many people so frickin retarded?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
484133 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:10 pm to
quote:

and listen to it straight from the source.

The source does not say this

quote:

DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud


just FYI
Posted by TechBullDawg
Member since May 2014
2924 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:11 pm to
Thune knows and is why he stonewalled
Posted by RCDfan1950
United States
Member since Feb 2007
40311 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:12 pm to
Grab those voters and deport IMMEDIATELY and the whole rigged vote/ballot harvesting mechanism crashes. At least temporarily. Albeit many of those voters likely didn’t even know if or who they ‘voted’ for.

The Supreme Court owns this crap. There are “sins of commission and sins of omission “. Guilty as charged.

Compassion and mercy for the World’s poor is another argument. Qualifiers for mercy is the rule. In Heaven (assuming such exists) and in Earth. Break the Rule and it all goes to hell.
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44116 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

The source does not say this

quote:


DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud



just FYI


Now it's time for the clown spin apparently. Yes, he does say exactly that. Specifically he says, "we have 1,600 cases of voter fraud ongoing and 300,000 more we are getting to."

When you call for a clown, expect a circus.
This post was edited on 9/30/26 at 12:15 pm
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
484133 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:16 pm to
quote:

Now it's time for the clown spin apparently. Yes, he does say exactly that. S


quote:

Over 1,600 voter fraud cases currently investigating and 300,000 MORE WE'RE GETTING TO


Investigating 1600 doesn't mean that all of that 1600 will be cases of voter frauce

They haven't even begun investigating the 300k to determine if they are actual cases of voter fraud

How can they determine voter fraud prior to investigating?
Posted by AUFANATL
Member since Dec 2007
5574 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:17 pm to

Why not commit voter fraud?

If you win, you get to obstruct the process of investigating the fraud and grease the rails for more fraud in the future.

95% of the media and 50% of the political and judicial apparatus (95% in areas where fraud is most likely to occur) is pot-committed to the belief that voter fraud doesn't exist and any attempts to illustrate the contrary is a "threat to democracy".

Even under the best, most ideal circumstances (non fraud candidate wins, ample resources are dedicated to exposing the fraud and irrefutable proof is found), it still takes YEARS to navigate all of this at which point the damage was done. There is no conceivable way to unravel and litigate this mess in the 50 days between an election and swearing in.

Why play by the rules when the game is rigged and you can't change the outcome anyway?
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
60622 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:19 pm to

quote:

In the statement he says they're only actually investigating 1600 so far


In other words, it's so much that they have the manpower to investigate only a small portion yet the prior administration and its supporters have stated time and again our elections are secure (thus requiring IDs must be "ray-cis").
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44116 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Investigating 1600 doesn't mean that all of that 1600 will be cases of voter frauce

They haven't even begun investigating the 300k to determine if they are actual cases of voter fraud

How can they determine voter fraud prior to investigating?


For fricks sake, you pedantic, obtuse motherjiver. Did I say that these cases will be proven instances of voter fraud? No, I didn't. But that doesn't change the fact that they have a current workload of 1,600 cases with a backlog of 300,000 more.

And you frickin know this too, you g-damn clown. Get the frick out of here with this nonsense.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
118063 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:21 pm to
Until there are arrests, it's lip service
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44116 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:26 pm to
quote:

Until there are arrests, it's lip service


In regards to this here, how can any one agency be expected to handle a caseload like this? This presents a much larger issue, imo. Especially in regards to how they treat the upcoming midterm elections. This presents a pretty clear and present danger to our country. It should be treated as such. It'll be years before this shite is resolved.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
484133 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

In other words, it's so much that they have the manpower to investigate only a small portion yet the prior administration and its supporters have stated time and again our elections are secure (thus requiring IDs must be "ray-cis").

We don't have any evidence to make this conclusion, either.

He didn't give anything worth making any judgments

Are these simply citizens registered in two states? Illegals on voter rolls? We don't know
Posted by TigerAxeOK
In the woods and by the waters.
Member since Dec 2016
38930 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:30 pm to
quote:

So now the Trump admin is cross-checking names and finding MORE FRAUD THAN EXPECTED

More fraud than who expected? I honestly don't believe a single state other than Minnesota has been blue since the 1980s.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
484133 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

For fricks sake, you pedantic, obtuse motherjiver. Did I say that these cases will be proven instances of voter fraud?


You said

quote:

I mean, you could play the video and listen to it straight from the source.


I said

quote:

The source does not say this


quote:

DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud



just FYI


Now you say

quote:

. Did I say that these cases will be proven instances of voter fraud? No, I didn't. But that doesn't change the fact that they have a current workload of 1,600 cases with a backlog of 300,000 more.



Now you agree with my original comment.

The source does NOT say this

quote:

DHS Finds 300,000 Cases of Voter Fraud


It's 300k in a backlog queue which haven't been determined to be cases of voter fraud

Posted by SlowFlowPro
With populists, expect populism
Member since Jan 2004
484133 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

In regards to this here, how can any one agency be expected to handle a caseload like this?


Follow the example of the January 6 riots
Posted by BoarEd
The Hills
Member since Oct 2015
44116 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:34 pm to
It doesn't matter how you try to parse it, you're wrong. They have 300,000 cases of voter fraud they're working on.



It's not possible that you don't understand this.
Posted by roadGator
DeBoar’s hollow dome
Member since Feb 2009
160403 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:34 pm to
Got heeeeem
Posted by Henry Jones Jr
Member since Jun 2011
78975 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:35 pm to
Until people are arrested and held accountable, I don’t care about what they found
Posted by BTROleMisser
Murica'
Member since Nov 2017
17293 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:36 pm to
NUH UH!!!!!! REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!
NO PROOF!!!!! MAGA CONSPIRACY!!!! MOST SECURE ELECTION IN HISTORY!!!!! BIG LIE!!!!! BASELESS CLAIMS!!!!

- TDS figs
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
21918 posts
Posted on 9/30/26 at 12:38 pm to
quote:

direct, credible evidence


The standard tightens.

It used to be "evidence." Then it became "direct evidence." Now it's "direct, credible evidence."

What's next? Let's see. How 'bout "direct, credible, double eye-witnessed by NASA QA, filmed, time-stamped, fingerprinted, DNA-sampled evidence."
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

Facebook•X•Instagram