Started By
Message

re: Details emerging about fatal shooting of BLM ‘protester’ in Austin, TX are stunning

Posted on 8/1/20 at 8:51 am to
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 8:51 am to
Wait what lol. You couldn’t turn on a TV and hear that guy’s name without his rank. Both sides love to play up a Troop angle when they can.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 8:53 am to
quote:

You couldn’t turn on a TV and hear that guy’s name without his rank.
I was referencing our fellow posters. Apparently, your comment was intended to reference a broader group.
Posted by Flats
Member since Jul 2019
25409 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 8:57 am to
quote:

They will no longer be using the bullpup


Can you blame them? The damn things go off by themselves, killing Joes in basic training. Every. Day.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
21480 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:28 am to
This entire thread:

This post was edited on 8/1/20 at 9:29 am
Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
32434 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:32 am to
quote:

Sgt. Daniel Perry
Not a pussy.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
21480 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:32 am to
quote:

But the majority here REFUSED to reference Vindman by the rank of “Lt.Colonel,” because ... HE WAS A DEEP STATE POS....


FIFY
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
69288 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:33 am to
quote:

Sgt. Perry


Not a pussy
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
21480 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Not a pussy.


Posted by bhtigerfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2008
32434 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:42 am to
quote:

Where's the dumbshit from the other thread who said he wasn't pointing it at Sgt Perry?
There was a pic on here the other night that appears to show him with the buttstock on his shoulder. The rest of the rifle is obscured by other people, but it certainly looks like he’s pointing or in the process of pointing the rifle.
This post was edited on 8/1/20 at 10:12 am
Posted by Texas Yarddog
Member since Apr 2018
2985 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 9:53 am to
quote:

Did he have less a right to carry a weapon than these folks?

Granted, he played a stupid game and won a stupid prize, but that is an entirely different question than the one you asked.


Read again. I didn't question his right to carry (although I am very surprised that you support the 2nd).

I questioned why openly carry in the middle of a (supposedly) peaceful protest not that it was illegal to do so.
Posted by Toomer Deplorable
Team Bitter Clinger
Member since May 2020
21480 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 10:06 am to
quote:



I questioned why openly carry in the middle of a (supposedly) peaceful protest not that it was illegal to do so.




It is a point that needs emphasizing.

He had a right to carry. He had the right to carry a rifle at a “peaceful” protest.

Yet he did not have a right to block and impede traffic. And he did not have a right to mob a car while raising a rife out of the half-ready position.

Which all leads to the main point: we are discussing his “rights” in the past tense because he FA&FO the hard way.
This post was edited on 8/1/20 at 10:14 am
Posted by Damone
FoCo
Member since Aug 2016
32966 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 10:09 am to
quote:

Why even bring an AK to a "peaceful" protest?

Exercise two Constitutional rights simultaneously?
Posted by TbirdSpur2010
ALAMO CITY
Member since Dec 2010
134050 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 10:10 am to
I love it.
Posted by Wolfhound45
Member since Nov 2009
121644 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 10:15 am to
quote:

Every. Day.
Every. Damn. Day.

You would think we would have pulled the bull pup from our inventory by now. I personally am terrified to touch it.
Posted by Smokeyone
Maryville Tn
Member since Jul 2016
19916 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 10:17 am to
quote:

I questioned why openly carry in the middle of a (supposedly) peaceful protest not that it was illegal to do so.


To shoot at cops attempting to impede to protest.
Posted by Lima Whiskey
Member since Apr 2013
22594 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 10:20 am to
Agreed - there was nothing wrong with carrying a rifle, but it appears he was looking for trouble - or at least wanted to feel powerful and important.

If you shoulder a rifle and point it at someone, that person has every reason to fear for their life, and every reason to defend themselves.

The deceased, not that I know them, come across as an immature child, playing dress up.

And that appears to be common among these protesters.

They’re man childs. Boys who never grew up to be men. And it’s a huge problem in western culture. We have a lot of these people who are stuck in a perpetual childhood.

In this case, it got him killed.
This post was edited on 8/1/20 at 1:57 pm
Posted by IslandBuckeye
Boca Chica, Panama
Member since Apr 2018
10067 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 10:33 am to
quote:

But the majority here REFUSED to reference Vindman by the rank of “Lt.Colonel,” because ... reasons.


If I was still in uniform and wearing one, I would refer to him as Lt Colonel.

As I am not, I can voice my opinion of him and refuse to offer any modicum of respect. He does not deserve my respect because he disregarded the chain of command and used his military position to further a political agenda.

To compare Sergeant Daniel Perry to Mr. Vindeman makes sense, at least to those of us that were trained by and served in US military.
Posted by Blizzard of Chizz
Member since Apr 2012
19984 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 10:42 am to
quote:

It has now been confirmed by several witnesses that this individual with the assault rifle then began to raise the assault rifle toward Sgt. Perry.


Where is the poster that argued with everyone that there was no proof this dumbass had the rifle in a ready position and when shown photographic evidence still argued that there was no definitive proof it was him or a rifle in the pic?
Posted by Bobby OG Johnson
Member since Apr 2015
31976 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 11:06 am to
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
44345 posts
Posted on 8/1/20 at 1:08 pm to
quote:

There was a pic on here the other night that appears to show him with the buttstock on his shoulder. The rest of the rifle is obscured by other people, but it certainly looks like he’s pointing or in the process of pointing the rifle.
The picture that I saw, the barrel of the rifle was actually visible sticking out from behind the woman standing in front of him. It was angled down at about a 45° level… basically at the car.

The problem, however, is that he seems to have been on the opposite side of the vehicle versus what was described by the driver. Perhaps the parties moved around a bit before the actual shooting.
first pageprev pagePage 7 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram