- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dept. of War announces next generation of Pentagon press corps
Posted on 10/22/25 at 1:58 pm to ThuperThumpin
Posted on 10/22/25 at 1:58 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
frick off with that shite...and nothing you said makes what I said untrue.
Nothing you said is true.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 1:58 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
if the anchor isn’t a credentialed member of the pentagon press corps,
Thats an issue.. if they are ....they could lose access for reporting on something that makes certain folks at the Pentagon unhappy.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:00 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
they could lose access for reporting on something that makes certain folks at the Pentagon unhappy.
This is nothing new. The mitigating factor is having to explain why someone was kicked out for their reporting. Anything short of obvious justification would get plenty of unwanted attention.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:04 pm to ThuperThumpin
I think they are complaining because it makes it harder to do their job.
A job often requiring manipulation of facts to fit a narrative.
War fighting is not a fertile field for truth. Never has been so I see no downside to this.
A job often requiring manipulation of facts to fit a narrative.
War fighting is not a fertile field for truth. Never has been so I see no downside to this.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:04 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Can you link this one? I haven't seen it so I don't know the details.
The Hill
LINK
quote:
Is this concern centered around whistleblower protection?
That could be a part of it but its just a general tightening of the information flow that I dont see as warranted. Or at least I havent heard a satisfactory answer as to why it is warranted. Have you?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:05 pm to hawgfaninc
Can Hegseth do a pullup yet?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:06 pm to GRTiger
quote:
The mitigating factor is having to explain why someone was kicked out for their reporting
This would seem to limit the need for explanation ..no?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:09 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
Or at least I havent heard a satisfactory answer as to why it is warranted. Have you?
It's to stop the absolute flood of leaking information that is not for global publication. Assuming you agree the pentagon has a legit reason not to announce our strategies to enemies, in part for political reasons, then I assume we can both agree that's a justification for making journos promise not to actively try and obtain unauthorized info.
Eta
It's also not a new concept that personnel aren't by default authorized to speak to the media. It's why press secretaries exist. No entity public or private lets theor grunts speak on behalf of the company, department, unit, etc.
This post was edited on 10/22/25 at 2:14 pm
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:09 pm to ThuperThumpin
The Pentagon is not going to come out and say “we have leakers, we may have traitors and we may have inside people not dedicated to truth and security let alone the questionable tactics and questionable patriotism of the press “.
So this
So this
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:10 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
its just a general tightening of the information flow that I dont see as warranted.
You don't see how unfettered access for activist journalists in one of the most secure buildings in the world is an issue?
Frankly I'm surprised it's taken this long to lock the place down given all the leaks that spring out of there.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:33 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
a general tightening of the information flow that I dont see as warranted
Why should information be able to flow at all from the pentagon without approval by the pentagon?
Again, if information gets out and the press reports on it, that happens anyway. This is just making sure that unauthorized information is not being solicited by persons with the privilege of being physically present within the pentagon.
If journalists want to break stories with unauthorized information, they’ll need to get their information like anyone else. If they want access to the pentagon, they give up the ability to use unauthorized info. Why should they get to have their cake and eat it too?
Or better yet, why should any journalist be invited into the pentagon at all?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:37 pm to Bamanjo
quote:
Today our glorious president inspired the troops by running a 4 minute mile and bench pressing his own body weight of 190 pounds.
Lol, you think this administration is somehow afraid of negative coverage?
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:38 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Lol, you think this administration is somehow afraid of negative coverage?
Yes
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:43 pm to Bamanjo
quote:
Yes
Then it would appear you’re an idiot.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:43 pm to Bamanjo
Call the plumber. DU is leaking.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:47 pm to hawgfaninc
Just what the country needs:
Government approved journalists, great for democracy…
Government approved journalists, great for democracy…
Posted on 10/22/25 at 2:56 pm to Jack Bauers HnK
quote:
This is just making sure that unauthorized information is not being solicited by persons with the privilege of being physically present within the pentagon.
Even for simply asking questions that they may be unauthorized to hear answers to...... The policy suggests that asking agency personnel to disclose unauthorized information is not a protected activity under the First Amendment, potentially exposing reporters to prosecution for simply doing their jobs.
quote:
Or better yet, why should any journalist be invited into the pentagon at all?
As a method of at least trying to hold the government accountable? It sounds like we have a fundamental difference in the role the press should have in keeping government in check.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 3:17 pm to ThuperThumpin
quote:
. Any form of corruption that is or was taking place at the pentagon will be much harder to investigate
The MSM was/is the corruption.
Posted on 10/22/25 at 3:17 pm to Robin Masters
quote:
Then it would appear you’re an idiot.
wow, owned
Posted on 10/22/25 at 3:27 pm to GatorOnAnIsland
Exactly, and why we're seeing the DU meltdown here.
Popular
Back to top


0









