Started By
Message

Democrat bill to codify Roe

Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:25 pm
Posted by bluedragon
Birmingham
Member since May 2020
6549 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:25 pm
Does not include the word “Woman”

Did Jackson write this trash?

She can’t define woman.
Posted by WinnPtiger
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2011
23885 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:26 pm to
if it doesn’t include 500 billion in foreign aid I won’t believe it’s real
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71482 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:26 pm to
So as a man I can now have an abortion? Cool.
Posted by cajuntiger1010
Member since Jan 2015
9248 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:29 pm to
These idiots will push this bill so far left I can’t wait to see the backlash dems will get from moderate voters and minorities. They will bend over backwards for this abortion topic and go even more inhumane
Posted by Lsudx256
DFW
Member since Mar 2016
2911 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:35 pm to
The ultra progressives will never be happy with it. They won’t vote for it until they are able to either kill or frick kids at 3 years old.
Posted by Big Jim Slade
Member since Oct 2016
4934 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:44 pm to
Hey Bossperson, I’m not gonna be able to make it in to work on Monday….I’m having an abortion.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71482 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:45 pm to
Exactly ^
Posted by Landmass
Member since Jun 2013
18168 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:47 pm to
They'll probably word it where a man can choose for the woman to abort, and she has to abort because they are one of those tranny couples and the woman has the dick.
Posted by momentoftruth87
Member since Oct 2013
71482 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:48 pm to
Actually men should have a say. Again, terrible law to begin with.
Posted by jaytothen
Member since Jan 2020
6408 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:52 pm to
Posted by Corso
Atlanta
Member since Feb 2020
10741 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 1:36 am to
quote:

The ultra progressives will never be happy with it. They won’t vote for it until they are able to either kill or frick kids at 3 years old.


I chuckled at this at first but this is legitimately where the left is headed
Posted by Rip N Lip
What does my VPN say?
Member since Jul 2019
5227 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 1:45 am to
quote:

So as a man I can now have an abortion? Cool.


Amazon will pay a dude $4k to shite a turd? Sign me up.
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
123945 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 6:01 am to
quote:

Does not include the word “Woman”
That would be interesting language to see. Unless they are VERY careful, they could fool around and unintentionally bestow paternal rights.
This post was edited on 5/10/22 at 6:02 am
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67490 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 6:10 am to
quote:

Democrat bill to codify Roe

Won't pass but IF the Dems could pass what they wanted to pass, it'd be:

Democrat bill to codify fricking children
Democrat bill to codify fricking animals
Democrat bill to codify killing whitey
Democrat bill to codify killing conservatives
Democrat bill to codify reparations
Etc, etc, etc
Posted by LRB1967
Tennessee
Member since Dec 2020
15679 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 6:14 am to
No worries. The Democrats don't have enough votes to pass it and they know it.
Posted by AggieHank86
Texas
Member since Sep 2013
42941 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 6:44 am to
quote:

Democrat bill to codify Roe by bluedragon Does not include the word “Woman”
Could you link? The draft I found contains the following language:
quote:

(8) The terms “woman” and “women” are used in this bill to reflect the identity of the majority of people targeted and affected by restrictions on abortion services, and to address squarely the targeted restrictions on abortion, which are rooted in misogyny.
It does not really matter, because the Dems cannot beat the 60-vote threshold in the Senate.
This post was edited on 5/10/22 at 6:45 am
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98887 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 6:48 am to
quote:

and to address squarely the targeted restrictions on abortion, which are rooted in misogyny


No.

Misogyny would be if the restrictions only applied to male fetuses/babies
Posted by NineLineBind
LA....no, the other one
Member since May 2020
6917 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 6:53 am to
quote:

quote:
(8) The terms “woman” and “women” are used in this bill to reflect the identity of the majority of people targeted and affected by restrictions on abortion services, and to address squarely the targeted restrictions on abortion, which are rooted in misogyny.

When you’re about deleting the language but can’t write a bill without it.

These people are human pretzels.
Posted by dakarx
Member since Sep 2018
6851 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 6:56 am to
Does a man getting an abortion qualify for the 3 paid days of bereavement time??
Posted by Diamondawg
Mississippi
Member since Oct 2006
32261 posts
Posted on 5/10/22 at 6:57 am to
They don't have 60 votes. They just want the "nays" on record.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram