- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dem Doug Jones is pro abortion until birth.... admitts it in interview.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 7:38 pm to 420centraltime
Posted on 11/19/17 at 7:38 pm to 420centraltime
quote:
Yeah these idiots are all pro-life and then when the disabled child is on government programs for the rest of its life they will bitch and whine about supporting it.
People whose entire worldview is based on personal responsibility support policies that require people to take responsibility for their actions? No way!
0
Posted on 11/19/17 at 7:47 pm to Jjdoc
It is flat out fricking insane that we view partial birth abortion as a woman's right in this country
Posted on 11/19/17 at 7:47 pm to mahdragonz
“Most” does not equal all so you are a ok with a certain amount of birder for convenience? How many a year? And with modern medicine that is obvious before 9 months.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 7:48 pm to Bama54
quote:
So not true. 3rd trimester abortion is illegal in the 3rd trimester, unless the mother’s life is in immediate danger. Mr. Jones upholds the law of the land, unlike his opponent who has been removed from the bench twice. Mr Moore does uphold the molestation of underage women.
Thats his words. Are you saying he didnt say that?
Posted on 11/19/17 at 8:08 pm to Vacherie Saint
This post was edited on 11/19/17 at 8:16 pm
Posted on 11/19/17 at 8:12 pm to Pbhog
quote:
Republicans hate big government until they love it.
Please explain
Posted on 11/19/17 at 8:23 pm to upgrayedd
Good luck to Jones and keep a women’s right to abortion..
Posted on 11/19/17 at 8:57 pm to Jjdoc
Ok.
I read the thread.
I read the thread.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 9:01 pm to mahdragonz
MOST os still unacceptable, there should be NO viable late term abortions. period. Murder is far worse than groping.
Posted on 11/19/17 at 11:37 pm to 420centraltime
quote:one doesn't have to be pro handouts for bums to be pro life. You won't comprehend that.
Yeah these idiots are all pro-life and then when the disabled child is on government programs for the rest of its life they will bitch and whine about supporting it
Posted on 11/20/17 at 6:54 am to 420centraltime
quote:
Yeah these idiots are all pro-life and then when the disabled child is on government programs for the rest of its life they will bitch and whine about supporting it.
So by your logic bitching and moaning about gov programs (and waste inherent to that system) is = to the positive action of telling a doctor to take apart a life inside of the mother and the vacuum it out?
You are recycling a tired talking point. If you are going to use the “pro-life until” quip at least shoot for something defensible like the death penalty.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:24 am to chalmetteowl
quote:You weren't speaking of the law in your first post. You were talking about people butting out of the business of the mother and the doctor, at least that's how it came across to me.
not a premise... Its the law, no different than a tumor on the mother's belly
When you say the unborn child is "no different than a tumor on the mother's belly", are you talking about legally or ontologically?
Posted on 11/20/17 at 9:26 am to Jjdoc
Why does Doug Jones enjoy the killing of babies?
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:48 am to FooManChoo
quote:that's what should happen
. You were talking about people butting out of the business of the mother and the doctor, at least that's how it came across to me.
quote:should be legally. The woman's rights come first
When you say the unborn child is "no different than a tumor on the mother's belly", are you talking about legally or ontologically?
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:50 am to Jjdoc
"It's ok to kill babies but not murderers."
Posted on 11/20/17 at 10:55 am to Pbhog
quote:
If jjdoc isn’t a Russian alt-right troll bot than I’m not a Razorback fan.
Muh Russians. Derp.
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:02 am to chalmetteowl
quote:Only if the unborn child isn't actually a human being and alive.
that's what should happen
By the time a woman even knows she's pregnant, the child is biologically human and has all the necessary tools to be born and to grown up into you and me. The only thing it needs is continual sustenance for its growth and development, just like you and I need.
quote:So if it is accepted (for argument's sake) that the unborn child is a human being and alive, that it shouldn't have any rights because of its residence inside its mother?
should be legally. The woman's rights come first
Are you supporting abortion just because it is currently legal?
Posted on 11/20/17 at 11:14 am to Jjdoc
Roy Moore just won.
As a libertarian my question to the pro life crowd is this--when are the rights of the child to be protected??
I do not buy this argument that somehow passage through the birth canal somehow creates civil rights. The child should be protected from the get go. The mother's right to choose does not supersede those of the child's right to live.
As a libertarian my question to the pro life crowd is this--when are the rights of the child to be protected??
I do not buy this argument that somehow passage through the birth canal somehow creates civil rights. The child should be protected from the get go. The mother's right to choose does not supersede those of the child's right to live.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News