- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DC Circuit Court of Appeals has agreed to rehear the Michael Flynn case
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:28 pm to Jspaspa3303
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:28 pm to Jspaspa3303
quote:
What a crock of shite . This is strictly being done to silence him until the election is over in hopes Trump will lose the election . This is a 30 year veteran who served his country , and is being railroaded right before our very eyes .
And this is all being done by judges. Judges who are at a level to be mentioned as possible SC justices. After the coming violence and revolution, doing away with lifetime appointments for piece of shite judges who refuse to be bound by constitutional restraints must happen.
1
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:30 pm to SCLibertarian
quote:
. It exposes the lie that Democrats care about criminal justice reform.
basically. i make this argument all the time
you cannot say you support CJ reform and support the behavior of Judge Sullivan
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:31 pm to troyt37
Lawyers around here call it robitis. When someone puts that robe on, they become a different person. And Federal judges are the most authoritarian group of people in this country. They worship the government they work for.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:32 pm to Decatur
How are they hearing a case for which no charges exist? That's not how it works...
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:37 pm to idlewatcher
quote:
People need to pull these judges out of their f'ing chairs and tar and feather them
As an appetizer....
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:42 pm to LSUisKING
quote:
How are they hearing a case for which no charges exist? That's not how it works...
The charges were accepted by the Court when the Defendant plead guilty
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:43 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
The charges were accepted by the Court when the Defendant plead guilty
Did the DOJ not drop the charges?
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:44 pm to LSUisKING
quote:
Did the DOJ not drop the charges?
no
they're trying to do this, though.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:45 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
no
they're trying to do this, though.
My apologies. I misunderstood Mr. Limbaugh.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:53 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
they're trying to do this, though.
A first in America where a case goes from titled:
FLYNN VS THE U.S. GOVERNMENT
to
FLYNN VS THE JUDGE THAT TRIED THE CASE SINCE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT DECIDED NOT TO PROSECUTE
Sydney's list just got that much longer
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:55 pm to Junky
quote:
FLYNN VS THE JUDGE THAT TRIED THE CASE SINCE THE U.S. GOVERNMENT DECIDED NOT TO PROSECUTE
Actually the government prosecuted the case through to a guilty plea. It was only after the defendant became a ward of the Court for sentencing purposes that the government then tried to go back and rescind the prosecution.
This post was edited on 7/30/20 at 12:57 pm
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:55 pm to TrueTiger
quote:
this is not about justice
but it is about weaponizing the justice system to crush your political enemies
I never thought that I would live to see the day that the vaunted USA would spiral down to this level of Totalitarian destitution!
I'm very glad that my own level of personal sacrifice to defend the USA was not too much out of balance with the actual worthiness of said USA.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:55 pm to Decatur
won't that be kind of tough when the DOJ like, y'know, DROPPED THE frickING CASE?
You can't make a prosecution show up to a case they don't want to try
You can't make a prosecution show up to a case they don't want to try
Posted on 7/30/20 at 12:56 pm to cajunangelle
Does anyone know what he supposedly lied about then?
Posted on 7/30/20 at 1:00 pm to InGAButLoveBama
quote:Petey Strzok knows, it's all on the "edited" 302
Does anyone know what he supposedly lied about then?
Posted on 7/30/20 at 1:01 pm to Decatur
Just continuing to waste tax payers money to attack a sitting president. Liberal do nothing playbook.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 1:02 pm to InGAButLoveBama
Russian sanctions and embassy expulsions. The FBI agents didn't think he lied or intended to deceive them. This was an off-the-cuff conversation he had without any formal preparation for it.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 1:02 pm to Decatur
One more partisan hook to keep things stirred up against Trump Administration. This entire circuit court should be rounded up and indicted for treason.
Posted on 7/30/20 at 1:04 pm to InGAButLoveBama
quote:
So why did he lie then? I just don't understand why he felt the need to lie.
I finally got around to wasting a few hours of my life and watched the Tiger King. In one of the "episodes", one of the workers says that the FBI sent three different agents in to ask him the very same questions. Just to be sure that he has his story straight.
If you say that you made a call on a Thursday, then in the next interview, say that the call was made on a Friday...you have lied. About nothing pertinent to the investigation.
Having said that, the agents initially said that Gen Flynn did not lie.
See how this works?
Posted on 7/30/20 at 1:04 pm to boosiebadazz
Which then he's simply trying to withdraw his guilty plea, which yes is a tall order if the prosecution opposes the effort, but if the prosecution signals no opposition or especially if they join in the motion.....rarely is a judge an obstacle to that effort. The only reason such is the case here is because the judge is pissy about the government being so agreeable. Judge has convinced himself that it's scandalous. Which is dumb because the government is the party that is the most in the know as to how a matter should be addressed, thus the government's broad discretion.
I know I'm not telling you anything you aren't aware of, even if you disagree. You're a lawyer if I'm not mistaken.
I know I'm not telling you anything you aren't aware of, even if you disagree. You're a lawyer if I'm not mistaken.
Page 4 of 6
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News