Started By
Message

re: Data shows cases are up in least vaccinated areas

Posted on 7/31/21 at 9:06 am to
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 9:06 am to
quote:

Yep. The CDC putting out its own report a couple of months ago saying that 50% of the people who got the smallpox vaccine back in the 50s and 60s were susceptible to getting cancer tells me all I need to know. That was 60 years ago and we're just now hearing about it? Damn.



This was first reported in 1968.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34249 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 9:38 am to
quote:

This was first reported in 1968.


By the CDC? Link?
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 9:41 am to
quote:

By the CDC? Link?



Why would it matter if the CDC reported it? Or do you want the exact citation? It isn't exactly a secret if people knew anything about smallpox vaccination efforts, which had exceedingly high injury rates. I'm responding to the notion that 'we are just now hearing about it.'

This post was edited on 7/31/21 at 9:42 am
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89587 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 9:45 am to
quote:

How do you people keep saying the vaccineisn’t effective and that vaccinated people are “superspreaders?”



"you people" - and I didn't say, the CDC said it when they:

1. Released data showing the vaccinated are walking around with higher viral loads (coupled with symptoms, that makes them more likely to spread it), AND

2. Vaccinated should wear masks again (to reiterate - masks don't work, but even the folks who do believe they work say they only work to keep from spredding, not contracting)

So, in your OP, "you people" are the CDC. And you don't believe them.



We got on that train a long time ago.
Posted by thetempleowl
dallas, tx
Member since Jul 2008
14840 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:20 am to
quote:

Released data showing the vaccinated are walking around with higher viral loads (coupled with symptoms, that makes them more likely to spread it), 


So who makes up hospitalized patients usually?

Who makes up deaths from covid, vaccinated or unvaccinated?

I mean if he's reality is where it's at and the vaccine does nothing, why do unvaccinated die way more commonly than the vaccinated?

What matters to you, dying or getting a cold?

quote:

Vaccinated should wear masks again (to reiterate - masks don't work, but even the folks who do believe they work say they only work to keep from spredding, not contracting)


I do hate to say this, but you can't quote the cdc when it comes to giving good medical advice. They are nothing more than a political organization.

This happened when Obama was president.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34249 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:22 am to
quote:

Why would it matter if the CDC reported it? Or do you want the exact citation? It isn't exactly a secret if people knew anything about smallpox vaccination efforts, which had exceedingly high injury rates. I'm responding to the notion that 'we are just now hearing about it.'


Because the CDC noting it 50 years later seems odd to me. You implied that they did so in 1968 (seemingly dismissing the OP’s post).

I asked for documentation.

quote:

I'm responding to the notion that 'we are just now hearing about it.'


Cool.
This post was edited on 7/31/21 at 10:24 am
Posted by dawgfan24348
Member since Oct 2011
49325 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:25 am to
quote:

I’m not at a great risk from covid

It's about not spreading it to those with weak immune systems and others that can't get a vaccine but hey frick them you're too scared of a little vaccine

Damn this board has become anti vaxx and is too far up their own arse to see it
Posted by BobBoucher
Member since Jan 2008
16760 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:25 am to
54% of the population is vaxxed.

21% of the population had COVID and has natural immunity.

That’s ~70%.

Do you really think a virus can explode and propagate across only 30% of the population???

Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:28 am to
quote:

Because the CDC noting it 50 years later seems odd to me.


Why would it be odd? I'm sure if I looked, I could find references to it earlier in CDC literature, as the injury rate of smallpox vaccines wasn't exactly hidden from the public. In fact, DA Henderson, who was involved in the CDC response to the smallpox eradication effort, has published numerous snippets as well as a book about the effort, with references to the various injuries that vaccination effort caused.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34249 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:32 am to
quote:

Take it for what it’s worth, but Dr. Catherine O’Neal said that you have NO immunity from your prior infection.



quote:

Because of the mutation rate inherent to the virus itself. It's why herd immunity for RNA viruses (and indeed nearly all infectious diseases) has not developed naturally, because antibody response is antigen specific, and human populations are never in equilibrium.


Then your position seems to be that, since the virus continually mutates, then there is no way to realistically fight it. So, why have vaccines?

I mean, not one study has stated they are drastically more effective than natural immunity.

If nothing works, then why bother?
Posted by ItNeverRains
37069
Member since Oct 2007
25520 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 10:56 am to
quote:

Then your position seems to be that, since the virus continually mutates, then there is no way to realistically fight it. So, why have vaccines? I mean, not one study has stated they are drastically more effective than natural immunity. If nothing works, then why bother?


Exactly. By this logic, what magic ingredient is in the vaccine many people took around the time I had good old fashioned covid. How do those jab antibodies protect you in ways the natural a toy from the virus don’t.
Posted by crazy4lsu
Member since May 2005
36311 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:04 am to
quote:

Then your position seems to be that, since the virus continually mutates, then there is no way to realistically fight it. So, why have vaccines?



Well the mRNA vaccines are trying to manipulate the virus by putting selective pressure onto the most pathogenic portion of the virus, the spike protein, as these viruses exist as quasispecies in every individual, but still around a predominant strain. If enough people have enough antibodies to what causes the most severe disease, then the virus's genomic options generation to generation are limited significantly, at which point it can reach what is called the error threshold rate, where the mutation rate of the virus exceeds its ability to retain a stable genomic population generation to generation.

The problem with natural immunity is that it relies on memory B cell response, which itself takes time to restart, with chances for reinfection, but also the severity will decrease with subsequent infections. There is also a chance that the initial immune response can create what is called antigenic sin, in which the initial immune response can affect the responses by the immune system to other, closely related antigens, rather than an antigen specific response.

Public health officials have done a poor job describing the theory behind this particular vaccination attempt, and what would optimize it, as without population equilibrium, the effectiveness of piecemeal vaccination approach is limited. It is especially difficult in light of the fact that the infection is worldwide, and to effectively combat it, you need a worldwide approach, not one based on the individual profits of certain companies.

To be clear, the course of a natural infection can possibly make this virus like other common infections, but that will take a long time. The best chance in the interim is to push the virus towards its error threshold rate, which vaccination and natural immunity can do, but unvaccinated populations cannot. The latter serves as a site for prolonged and occult infections as well, which increases the likelihood of robustness of other morphological elements.
This post was edited on 7/31/21 at 12:38 pm
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124065 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:45 am to
quote:

Dr. Catherine O’Neal said that you have NO immunity from your prior infection.
quote:

Take it for what it’s worth
FWIW . . . It's not worth a hair off a rat's arse. If she actually said that, it's damn embarrassing she is product of LSU Med School and residency.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89587 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:46 am to
quote:

So who makes up hospitalized patients usually?



I was answering the OP's question.

If you want to accept the public health authority's data analysis and conclusions on the hospitalization and death rates as gospel, that's up to you.

quote:

I do hate to say this, but you can't quote the cdc when it comes to giving good medical advice. They are nothing more than a political organization.


And there it is. I agree with you.
Posted by CamdenTiger
Member since Aug 2009
62473 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:48 am to
According to Harris, most people can’t work a Copy machine, so you trust these statistics?
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111565 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:50 am to
quote:

It's about not spreading it to those with weak immune systems and others that can't get a vaccine but hey frick them you're too scared of a little vaccine


Who can’t get a vaccine?
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Communist USA
Member since Nov 2007
12146 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 11:59 am to
quote:

54% of the population is vaxxed.

21% of the population had COVID and has natural immunity.

That’s ~70%.

Do you really think a virus can explode and propagate across only 30% of the population???



Stop thinking rationally. The VAX or die crowd gets agitated when you make sense. They want everybody in the VAX boat with them.
Posted by the808bass
The Lou
Member since Oct 2012
111565 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 12:14 pm to
quote:

54% of the population is vaxxed. 21% of the population had COVID and has natural immunity.


There’s some overlap there. But your overall point is correct. There’s not a lot of vulnerable population left.
Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34249 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

The best chance in the interim is to push the virus towards its error threshold rate, which vaccination and natural immunity can do, but unvaccinated populations cannot.


That is totally logical. Thank you for your response. It was enlightening.

Posted by jimmy the leg
Member since Aug 2007
34249 posts
Posted on 7/31/21 at 12:27 pm to
quote:

quote: 54% of the population is vaxxed. 21% of the population had COVID and has natural immunity.


quote:

There’s some overlap there. But your overall point is correct. There’s not a lot of vulnerable population left.


My wife and my parents are in this “overlapping” group, but they are it amongst my personal family and friends.

Now, as to those that have been vaccinated and are currently dealing with Covid, that list is growing.

My question is:

Is your immune system stronger with having Covid prior to your vaccination, or after (or, does it even matter?)?
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram