- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump" DNyuz
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:31 pm to I B Freeman
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:31 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
What's wrong with that?
Nothing.
I just do not believe you.
1
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:34 pm to Rolek
quote:
Your love of receiving downvotes is almost admirable.
I believe he is just ONE of the paid trolls and flamers here.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:38 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
Just the messenger cult members
Cult members? What does this have to do with your fellow vaxaddicts?
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:38 pm to TIGERHOLD
quote:yes im sure that was just a total coincidence. Im sure they would never plan to keep Trump tied up in a court room all year so he can’t campaign
Trial date is going to be January 2. Right around Iowa.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:40 pm to Indefatigable
What do you believe? I simply posted a link and pointed out what these Federalist Society members were saying.
While their view of the Constitution is rather shocking, what is even more discerning is the fact that these guys are not democrats or leftists making the interpretation.
While their view of the Constitution is rather shocking, what is even more discerning is the fact that these guys are not democrats or leftists making the interpretation.
This post was edited on 8/11/23 at 3:37 pm
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:48 pm to I B Freeman
Wipe the semen from your chin.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 3:19 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
Aren't you proud to be a cult member? What is insulting?
Which cult do I allegedly belong to?
Genuinely curious. As a natural contrariaian, I resist basically everything and nonconformity is my SOP. Colloquialism is inherently against my nature, so being a cultist would be the very antithesis of my mental and spiritual structure.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 3:22 pm to Pelican fan99
quote:
quote:
Trial date is going to be January 2. Right around Iowa.
yes im sure that was just a total coincidence. Im sure they would never plan to keep Trump tied up in a court room all year so he can’t campaign
Has the Biden gang hired Daniel Ortega to consult on winning elections?
Posted on 8/11/23 at 3:27 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
what is even more discerning is the fact that these guys are not democrats or leftists making the interruption.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 4:15 pm to I B Freeman
I know everyone finds this interpretation surprising, and even laughable, but y'all are missing the mark on the source of this theory.
William Baude and Michael Paulson are two, very well respected, conservative constitutional law scholars. Some of their theories are libertarian, and I think William Baude is a "Never Trump" conservative, but they are not desperate libs.
They are publishing a full article on their interpretation in the Penn Law Review (Penn, of course, is Trump's alma mater). Say what you will, but two respected Con Law Professors are not going to submit an article to Penn Law Review that is "laughable and desperate." They have reputations to uphold.
Their theory has been endorsed by Steven Calabresi, another Conservative Con Law professor who appears to be a Never Trumper. He worked in the Reagan White House and for AG Meese
Reason.com
The theory might not prevail, but it isn't crazy. The Fourteenth Amendment did not expire. It added an additional requirement to hold government office. To be eligible to run for President, a person must...
1. Be a natural born citizen
2. Be 35 years or older
3. Be a resident of the US for at least 14 years. AND
4. Not violated an oath of Office to defend the Constitution by engaging in "insurrection or rebellion".
No court decision or Congressional action is necessary for a SOS to recognize the first 3 requirements, so why can't they recognize the 4th requirement on their own?
There will be due process under this theory. If a SOS decided that Biden was born in Kenya instead of the US and therefore left him off the ballot, Biden would sue and rely on his birthday certificate as proof.
Likewise, if a SOS refuses to put Trump on the ballot because he engaged in insurrection, Trump would bring a suit.
It is also possible that another Republican candidate could sue during the primaries to keep Trump off the ballots.
William Baude and Michael Paulson are two, very well respected, conservative constitutional law scholars. Some of their theories are libertarian, and I think William Baude is a "Never Trump" conservative, but they are not desperate libs.
They are publishing a full article on their interpretation in the Penn Law Review (Penn, of course, is Trump's alma mater). Say what you will, but two respected Con Law Professors are not going to submit an article to Penn Law Review that is "laughable and desperate." They have reputations to uphold.
Their theory has been endorsed by Steven Calabresi, another Conservative Con Law professor who appears to be a Never Trumper. He worked in the Reagan White House and for AG Meese
Reason.com
The theory might not prevail, but it isn't crazy. The Fourteenth Amendment did not expire. It added an additional requirement to hold government office. To be eligible to run for President, a person must...
1. Be a natural born citizen
2. Be 35 years or older
3. Be a resident of the US for at least 14 years. AND
4. Not violated an oath of Office to defend the Constitution by engaging in "insurrection or rebellion".
No court decision or Congressional action is necessary for a SOS to recognize the first 3 requirements, so why can't they recognize the 4th requirement on their own?
There will be due process under this theory. If a SOS decided that Biden was born in Kenya instead of the US and therefore left him off the ballot, Biden would sue and rely on his birthday certificate as proof.
Likewise, if a SOS refuses to put Trump on the ballot because he engaged in insurrection, Trump would bring a suit.
It is also possible that another Republican candidate could sue during the primaries to keep Trump off the ballots.
This post was edited on 8/11/23 at 4:17 pm
Posted on 8/11/23 at 5:04 pm to JJJimmyJimJames
quote:
J6 was a DNC-FBI entirely orchestrated hoax
,he said, as he waited for the next Q drop to reconfirm his worldview.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 5:30 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
He summarized the article’s conclusion: “Donald Trump cannot be president — cannot run for president, cannot become president, cannot hold office — unless two-thirds of Congress decides to grant him amnesty for his conduct on Jan. 6.”
So members of the Federalist Society have convicted Trump already, without due process?
And the fact that you gave any merit to their bias, demonstrates how far gone you are
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:22 pm to woody1984
quote:Everyone knows what happened.
quote:
J6 was a DNC-FBI entirely orchestrated hoax
Thanks for the laugh so early in the morning. I needed that.
You know.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:28 pm to I B Freeman
I ain't clicking on your chinaman link
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:44 pm to I B Freeman
Remember when you used to claim there was an abundance of evidence Trump colluded with Russia?
You suck more that a Dyson fricking a Hoover.
You suck more that a Dyson fricking a Hoover.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 6:50 pm to I B Freeman
The anti-Trumpsters are coming out of the Deep State in droves.
I'll send the Bureau of Attaball - Creepy Joe Biden
I'll send the Bureau of Attaball - Creepy Joe Biden
Posted on 8/11/23 at 7:00 pm to Zarkinletch416
They’re in a little lull right now wherein they’ve forced themselves to believe that everything’s gonna be fine, they’ve got The Trump right where they want him, although it may not resemble anything like what they foresee, it will all fall into place. Just wait until xyz in the near future.
In the meantime, they wanted a show trial or a series of them to make Trump look so damn terrible, yet shockingly are not so subtly setting the stage for the proceedings to be hidden from the public, after starting to get the clues that it’s not quite falling into place like the anticipated. It will become more and more an embarrassing catastrophe that they will be trying to hide like a bunch of bumbling idiots.
It’s gonna be pleasing to watch. Very pleasing. Look no further than Trump’s usual strutting around without concern and enough confidence to kill a horse, demonstrating the inside knowledge that the government has nothing, and is screwing up even their traditional bread and butter leaking operations to damage the subject’s character and credibility.
It’s as if they’re hitting themselves, and they just won’t stop hitting themselves at that.
In the meantime, they wanted a show trial or a series of them to make Trump look so damn terrible, yet shockingly are not so subtly setting the stage for the proceedings to be hidden from the public, after starting to get the clues that it’s not quite falling into place like the anticipated. It will become more and more an embarrassing catastrophe that they will be trying to hide like a bunch of bumbling idiots.
It’s gonna be pleasing to watch. Very pleasing. Look no further than Trump’s usual strutting around without concern and enough confidence to kill a horse, demonstrating the inside knowledge that the government has nothing, and is screwing up even their traditional bread and butter leaking operations to damage the subject’s character and credibility.
It’s as if they’re hitting themselves, and they just won’t stop hitting themselves at that.
Posted on 8/12/23 at 3:02 pm to I B Freeman
This post is just as stupid as the article
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News