- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: "Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump" DNyuz
Posted on 8/11/23 at 10:48 am to I B Freeman
Posted on 8/11/23 at 10:48 am to I B Freeman
Do I detect Liz Cheney's fingerprints on this??
0
Posted on 8/11/23 at 10:50 am to Kattail
quote:
Dershowitz disagrees, say the 14th applies specifically to the Civil War era. These people are desperate.
They'd apply the "crimes against the party state" from the Soviet constitution if they could.
They really want to ban opposition to their vision of communist utopia.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 10:51 am to Indefatigable
quote:
Kyle Ardoin could just decide that Joe Biden committed insurrection and remove him from the ballot in Louisiana.
He could surely conclude that he committed bribery and treason without another single input.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 10:53 am to I B Freeman
quote:
I B Freeman
dumber than dogshit
have you any shame commie?
Posted on 8/11/23 at 10:53 am to Jon Ham
quote:
milar in absurdity to the idea that having the VP close his eyes and plug his ears to the results could change the outcome.
Just wanted a little more time to be sure. The result could have been confirmed.
Now, because everyone was told to stop asking questions, we will never really know.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 10:55 am to I B Freeman
quote:
"Conservative Case Emerges to Disqualify Trump" DNyuz
Posted on 8/11/23 at 10:55 am to TrueTiger
quote:
Just wanted a little more time to be sure.
The respective States and Congress are and were more than empowered to do that. Neither of them did so.
Nothing in the entire body of law of the United States gives the President of the Senate power to do anything in that context beyond open envelopes and count what is in them.
"Shall"
Its really that simple.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 10:56 am to SDVTiger
quote:
DyzzNutz.com
Is that a chyna owned website?
It’s what OP can suck on.
This post was edited on 8/11/23 at 10:56 am
Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:03 am to Indefatigable
quote:
"Shall"
Its really that simple.
and he did, no violation
Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:06 am to TrueTiger
Don't believe this but you had Q for five years?
Ok Trumpers
Ok Trumpers
Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:17 am to Tmcgin
quote:
Don't believe this but you had Q for five years?
I found all that stuff kinda weird.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:21 am to I B Freeman
"They want to disqualify Trump from running to help him. Obviously."
-Ronbots
-Ronbots
Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:53 am to I B Freeman
quote:
Just the messenger cult members
And then,
quote:
Save your personal insults for another thread.
So you start off with a snarky insult, then demand no retort?
Tell us exactly how you're any different than a DU or Reddit poster?
Posted on 8/11/23 at 11:59 am to Indefatigable
quote:
According to you
Wrong. I have made no interpretation. I am simply reading the report and the abstract and trying to understand just how they came to conclusions they did.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:00 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
Wrong. I have made no interpretation. I am simply reading the report and the abstract and trying to understand just how they came to conclusions they did.
Of course. Just providing information
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:01 pm to TigerAxeOK
quote:
cult members
quote:
snarky insult
Aren't you proud to be a cult member? What is insulting?
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:02 pm to Indefatigable
Right.
What's wrong with that?
What's wrong with that?
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:06 pm to I B Freeman
Retarded.
If he was impeachment and removed for it, they'd have e an argument
If he was impeachment and removed for it, they'd have e an argument
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:08 pm to I B Freeman
quote:
I B Freeman
^^^ Biggest douche on the site.
Posted on 8/11/23 at 12:09 pm to Kattail
quote:
quote:
The idea that some state official can unilaterally declare that an individual engaged in insurrection such that the candidate is disqualified under the 14th is one of the most laughable legal theories I have ever read on here.
Of course that’s ridiculous…to any rational person.
And that too would have been my reaction until I read the article. I still find it a crazy idea BUT let's think a little differently about this.
What in the Constitution would stop a state official from leaving a candidate off a ballot citing the clause???
Page 4 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News