- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Congressman ANDY OGLES (R-TN) files articles of IMPEACHMENT against activist Judge Amir Al
Posted on 2/27/25 at 12:57 pm to beaux duke
Posted on 2/27/25 at 12:57 pm to beaux duke
quote:
andy ogles is the dumbest congressman not named tim burchett
Hank Johnson, Omar and AOC disagree.
0
Posted on 2/27/25 at 12:58 pm to beaux duke
Have you been introduced to AOC? Hank Johnson ? Or maybe another 200 democrat congressman ?
Posted on 2/27/25 at 12:59 pm to TS1926
Ogles makes people who are full of shite look respectable.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:07 pm to beaux duke
quote:Whoa, whoa, whoa! Hank raises hand.
andy ogles is the dumbest congressman not named tim burchett
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:14 pm to Nosevens
quote:“Ruling I do not like” <> “high crimes and misdemeanors“
If it’s not brought to the forefront then it’s less likely to gain traction. While Democrats pull these stunts it’ll be futile when brought forward to SC.
This post was edited on 2/27/25 at 1:16 pm
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:22 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:If two bullshite impeachments against Trump haven’t taught you to recognize a bullshite impeachment, I’m not sure anyone can really help you understand.
That sounds like a pretty serious ‘misdemeanor’.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:24 pm to BCreed1
It's just a move to bring more attention to activist judges.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:26 pm to LSUSkip
Personally I'm in favor of using the full extent of our power and any arguable, borderline, etc. power available to do as much damage to the system that has a decades head start at opposing us.
Now, whether it'll work or backfire are different questions. But this judge is a political actor who started with the desire to derail the President's agenda and then worked backwards. If we have any half-credible basis for moving against him - great, do it. And the same to all the others. Strategic calls will have to be made as to what's a waste of time and what isn't.
Now, whether it'll work or backfire are different questions. But this judge is a political actor who started with the desire to derail the President's agenda and then worked backwards. If we have any half-credible basis for moving against him - great, do it. And the same to all the others. Strategic calls will have to be made as to what's a waste of time and what isn't.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:28 pm to BCreed1
I agree something needs to be done about these federal judges overstepping, but I doubt this can pass the house and damn sure won't pass the senate.
Also, it's not something that has a high percentage of success.
Also, it's not something that has a high percentage of success.
quote:
This is done through a vote of impeachment by the House and a trial and conviction by the Senate. As of September 2017, only 15 federal judges have been impeached, and only eight have been convicted.
This post was edited on 2/27/25 at 1:33 pm
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:32 pm to AggieHank86
Isn’t that basically what all appeals are ? Now how about the executive branch having powers to determine direction of the country vs the shopped judges that are considered liberal radicals ?
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:33 pm to Nosevens
quote:
Have you been introduced to AOC? Hank Johnson ? Or maybe another 200 democrat congressman ?
i have not
but i do know tim burchett and andy ogles and they are dumb as shite spoiled children of privilege
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:37 pm to beaux duke
Then I’m guessing that your honesty levels are subpar
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:38 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
We all know this will not get the 2/3 vote in the Senate that is necessary for removal. So what actually is the end game here
So not filing anything is better?
These people are damned if they do and damned if they don't with you people
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:39 pm to AggieHank86
quote:
If two bullshite impeachments against Trump haven’t taught you to recognize a bullshite impeachment, I’m not sure anyone can really help you understand.
Hank, as you know, and which probably both of us disdain, the impeachment process is mostly political.
That said, it is the conservative view that the blatant misuse of governmental power for strictly partisan power has skyrocketed under the woke (anti-truth) vision of America adopted by the Democrats.
Attempting to check this slide of legitimacy of government by the use of dishonest and naked partisan power, requires that actual abusers of the system be held accountable.
Removal from office for abuse of office is good. Convictions for crimes (ACTUAL crimes) is also a must.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:44 pm to Jimbeaux
quote:Devolution.
Hank, as you know, and which probably both of us disdain, the impeachment process is mostly political.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:49 pm to BCreed1
quote:
Amir Ali,
Posted on 2/27/25 at 1:55 pm to Diego Ricardo
quote:
Good fricking luck with that being anything other than stomping feet really angrily.
Don't be fooled, that judge is shitting in his pants, there's nothing worse than having several organizations and attorneys going through all of your records and your personal communications.
Anything they find is fair game.
What a ridiculously dumb move on his part. And for what?
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:03 pm to Major Dutch Schaefer
quote:
We all know this will not get the 2/3 vote in the Senate that is necessary for removal. So what actually is the end game here?
Yeah but doesn't it open an avenue for congress to exert some investigative powers? Review call logs for example? There maybe enough there that a judge wouldn't want scrutinized.
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:12 pm to Nosevens
quote:
Then I’m guessing that your honesty levels are subpar
i'm guessing you guess about lots of things you know nothing about
Posted on 2/27/25 at 2:18 pm to beaux duke
Well your dishonesty not knowing the ignorance of AOC & Hank Johnson wasn’t a guess but you lied just the same. Why someone like you come on a platform to back bullshite is perplexing, perfectly good waste of oxygen making that CO2 that libs think is so bad
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News