- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Comey has an appointment
Posted on 4/29/26 at 4:58 am to boosiebadazz
Posted on 4/29/26 at 4:58 am to boosiebadazz
Whats sad about your post is you cant or wont admit to the absolute hypocrisy of this statement, which is a common characteristic all you liberals have ya'll are always the first to cry wolf. for me, you liberal dicks are just amusing to listen to with the shite you vomit out of your mouth
0
Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:19 am to AUTigerking
quote:
Will it not lead to discovery?
Discovery is in civil cases. The government has to show Comey their case, but it doesn't work the other way. Comey isn't obligated to provide the government anything
Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:46 am to Sofaking2
quote:
In before someone says, “and nothing will happen”.
Wake me up after all of his appeals have been exhausted.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 5:56 am to boosiebadazz
Why do democrats and the media shill so hard for Jim Comey? This guy is supposedly a Republican who single handedly fricked Hillary right out of the White House. Yet every Dem in America is defending this clown today. Why? Is mutual Trump hate all it takes these days? shite, if it wasn’t for him, Trump likely never wins!
This post was edited on 4/29/26 at 5:58 am
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:07 am to boosiebadazz
quote:I think this is just the tip of the iceberg and they will add to it; like lying to Congress -many, many times.
Are you saying Turley is wrong?
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:12 am to wartiger2004
Damn, I like skinny gals with bow legs.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:19 am to Lou the Jew from LSU
quote:
It’s called lawfare. Remember?
I reckon the melt will be using the L-word when this fails
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:21 am to AlterEd
quote:
as things start to happen
Nothing of substance has happened
In fact, proper dot connecting would lead to the opposite conclusion, because if they had anything real they wouldn't be embarrassing themselves with this case
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:22 am to March1st
Would be a shame if he resisted arrest and had his face broken.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:23 am to BeeFense5
quote:
It’s honestly embarrassing that people think this is a “win”. I feel sad for these types.
It's incredibly sad to see what some people have become
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:46 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
quote:For the record, youre always wrong, and an idiot
quote:
I don’t disagree with you, but
Posted on 4/29/26 at 6:57 am to Vacherie Saint
quote:
Why do democrats and the media shill so hard for Jim Comey? This guy is supposedly a Republican who single handedly fricked Hillary right out of the White House. Yet every Dem in America is defending this clown today. Why? Is mutual Trump hate all it takes these days? shite, if it wasn’t for him, Trump likely never wins!
True, but the only reason he did that is because he promised congress if there was new information he would brief them. He was covering his own arse. He knew it would come out and if he had held it until after the election it would look pretty bad on him.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 7:08 am to Undertow
Soooo a grand jury of Comey's peers was presented with the evidence, reviewed the statutes and decided there is enough there/there to arrest Comey and force the DA to prepare for trial.
3 pages of comments so far and no one has questioned the veracity of the grand jury.
3 pages of comments so far and no one has questioned the veracity of the grand jury.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 7:10 am to boosiebadazz
quote:
boosiebadazz
USSC Decisions Affecting Limits to Free Speech Under the First Amendment:
- Imminent Lawless Action (Brandenburg v. Ohio): Speech that is intended to, and likely to, incite imminent illegal activity is not protected.
- Clear and Present Danger (Schenck v. United States): Speech creating a "clear and present danger"—like falsely shouting "fire" in a theater—is not protected.
- True Threats (Counterman v. Colorado): Statements where the speaker consciously disregarded a substantial risk that the communication would be viewed as threatening are not protected.
That’s only three of several that very well may apply to Comey’s dumbass act under the first amendment, with the “True Threat” decision being the most likely precedent to make it stick.
Posted on 4/29/26 at 7:19 am to Trevaylin
quote:
Soooo a grand jury of Comey's peers was presented with the evidence, reviewed the statutes and decided there is enough there/there to arrest Comey and force the DA to prepare for trial.
3 pages of comments so far and no one has questioned the veracity of the grand jury.
Indictments aren't a high bar, even with a grand jury, hence the idiom "you can indict a ham sandwich".
Just makes the prior GJ failures that much bigger of a black eye.
This post was edited on 4/29/26 at 7:20 am
Posted on 4/29/26 at 7:30 am to SlowFlowPro
finally. got the "ham Sandwich" comment after 3 pages. stellar response. you go guy
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News