- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
CNN now questioning 1st Amendment in headline article
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:16 am
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:16 am
Not linking the thread...but here are some quotes:
quote:
With most Americans hoping this week's expected inauguration protests look nothing like the Capitol siege, questions emerge about unrestrained free expression, long championed by First Amendment theorists as a benefit to society, no matter how ugly and hateful.
quote:
Not all First Amendment scholars are buying the safety valve theory, especially after the deadly episode at the Capitol. They question if extremist speech demands more limitations when it's inextricably linked to the violence at the nation's legislative headquarters, after hateful online rhetoric dovetailed with politicians and activists delivering speeches to revved-up crowds that marched to the Capitol, some bent on insurrection.
18
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:17 am to LSU0358
Let’s arrest CNN for this opinion and see if they still favor it
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:19 am to LSU0358
quote:
Capitol siege
They just can't help themselves with this bullshite
quote:
First Amendment theorists
They're also called Constitutionalists or patriots or just AMERICANS!!!!!!!
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:21 am to LSU0358
I mean these people are going to walk themselves into CCP territory and stupidly look up and say “hey wait a minute, how did we get here?”
This post was edited on 1/19/21 at 9:23 am
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:21 am to LSU0358
quote:
They question if extremist speech demands more limitations when it's inextricably linked to the violence at the nation's legislative headquarters
What about extremists speech when it’s inextricably linked to actual violence and destruction of private headquarters?
Like the 6 billion in damages this summer. Do the nations legislative headquarters not have insurance?
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:26 am to LSU0358
quote:
no matter how ugly and hateful.
And, by "ugly and hateful" they mean anything that doesn't march in goosestep with their insane, demented and deranged agenda.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:29 am to LSU0358
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:30 am to MMauler
quote:
And, by "ugly and hateful" they mean anything that doesn't march in goosestep with their insane, demented and deranged agenda.
Exactly. They’ll do what they’ve always done, create a dogwhistle word and apply it to anything they don’t like. It doesn’t even have to make sense, it’s hateful.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:31 am to LSU0358
quote:
They question if extremist speech demands more limitations when it's inextricably linked to the violence at the nation's legislative headquarters
So who gets to define 'extremist speech'?
And how do you prove this 'extremist speech' was responsible for violence? Because CNN said so?
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:50 am to LSU0358
quote:
They question if extremist speech demands more limitations when it's inextricably linked to the violence at the nation's legislative headquarters
limitations when we say it's inextricably linked
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:52 am to LSU0358
No true journalist could possibly be for limiting the 1A.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:52 am to LSU0358
They want European style thought crime laws.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:53 am to LSU0358
CNN are all terrorists.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:55 am to Chimlim
quote:
So who gets to define 'extremist speech'?
The newly-created "Expert Class."
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:56 am to LSU0358
quote:
questions emerge about unrestrained free expression, long championed by First Amendment theorists as a benefit to society, no matter how ugly and hateful.
How is this not EVEYRYONE's reaction to this statement?
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:58 am to blueboy
quote:
They want European style thought crime laws.
This is 100% accurate.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 9:59 am to SOKAL
quote:
No true journalist could possibly be for limiting the 1A.
There are no "true journalists" at CNN, just people like Brian Stetler and Don Lemon.
This post was edited on 1/19/21 at 10:00 am
Posted on 1/19/21 at 10:01 am to Ross
quote:
I mean these people are going to walk themselves into CCP territory and stupidly look up and say “hey wait a minute, how did we get here?”
they will squeal like stuck pigs the moment the new rules are used on them
Posted on 1/19/21 at 10:03 am to LSU0358
The actions of any crowd must judged separately from their "speech".
"Protesting" by blocking streets, committing criminal acts, acts of violence, destruction of property and/or assaulting people is NOT speech.
They will try and use acts to limit speech, but they are completely different issues.
"Protesting" by blocking streets, committing criminal acts, acts of violence, destruction of property and/or assaulting people is NOT speech.
They will try and use acts to limit speech, but they are completely different issues.
Posted on 1/19/21 at 10:03 am to GhostOfFreedom
How the hell was Orwell so off on the year?
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News