- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Clay Higgins saying people are getting lifetime twitter bans
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:51 pm to Insanochef69
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:51 pm to Insanochef69
While I get where Higgins is coming from, he and and rest of Congress have no business restricting any more of our freedoms, we do not trust you.
We The People will take care of this, you mutts just sit over there and pay attention.
We The People will take care of this, you mutts just sit over there and pay attention.
0
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:52 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Just because I support others’ rights to be vile and cruel on the internet out of some estrogen fueled hatred does not mean I want to partake in the madness.
i support other's right to free speech, as someone who served in the marines for 8 years i get asked often on issues of free speech and i answer honestly. i fought and served for all person's right of speech, but that falls in another category when you're defending\promoting\celebrating violence and\or death. you are now engaging in the behavior of it as well.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:56 pm to caliegeaux
quote:
i support other's right to free speech, as someone who served in the marines for 8 years i get asked often on issues of free speech and i answer honestly.
Semper Fidelis brother. I did 14 years myself in Corps and then another 10 in the national guard. Thank you for your service.
quote:
but that falls in another category when you're defending\promoting\celebrating violence and\or death.
Promoting maybe. The rest or just cruel and grotesque and vile IMO.
quote:What behavior?
you are now engaging in the behavior of it as well.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 12:58 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Semper Fidelis brother.
we'll agree to disagree, which is all well, and we wont shoot each other because of it. : we could remove our BDU tops and go square off in the lot though!
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:02 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Then the left has won.
Nah, just beating them at their own game
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:03 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Celebrating someone’s death, however grotesque and cruel it may be, is considered violence now?
No. But making insinuations like "Do Trump next" is an actual call to violence and that should not be tolerated.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:04 pm to Insanochef69
Don’t ban them. Take note and remember.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:04 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
You have freedom of speech.
You don't always have freedom from consequences.
I've been suspended from here probably at least a half dozen times
Can't say I didn't deserve it either
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:05 pm to Insanochef69
Bluesky is probably welcoming them with open arms.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:05 pm to jcaz
You guys haven’t figured out this is how they win. They use the decency of our country against us.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:05 pm to Insanochef69
Good, it’s about time we fight fire with fire!
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:06 pm to Powerman
free speech is one thing, cheering on the assassination of another american citizen is in its own category.
If the DOJ doesn't do anything about the threats, i dont have an issue with Elon.
If the DOJ doesn't do anything about the threats, i dont have an issue with Elon.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:08 pm to Radio One
quote:
One day ago I would have agreed with you.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:09 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Is that where we’re at? Words are violence?
Ppl can say whatever they want. But that doesn’t mean a private company has to allow their platform to be used to spew ppl’s hateful bs.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:10 pm to crimsonsaint
Ignore him. His job today is just to be a contrarian. Just shitty arguments in every single thread.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:14 pm to Insanochef69
I got a 24 hour ban for telling a leftist what I think of them. I didn't hold back. Probably deserved the ban.
This post was edited on 9/11/25 at 1:15 pm
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:15 pm to Insanochef69
quote:
People posting and making fun of the death of Charlie Kirk are scumbags but this reactions seems to be everything Charlie stood against. Trying to regulate freedom of speech and social media is straight out of a leftist playbook.
Civility is dead. His name was Charlie Kirk.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:17 pm to Arkaea79
quote:
Good. A website should have zero tolerance for political violence. And no, that is not "free speech"
Oh please tell us where you limit free speech. Where is that boundry?
Disgusting speech is in fact free speech.
Do you think people on our side would celebrate the death of certain people on the left?
Calling for someone's death would be too far, celebrating it while vile and contemptible, should be part of free speech.
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:18 pm to HeadCall
quote:
Celebrating someone’s death, however grotesque and cruel it may be, is considered violence now? Is that where we’re at? Words are violence? Silence is violence? Is that what Kirk stood for?
Headcheese
Posted on 9/11/25 at 1:21 pm to Insanochef69
I do agree with the Freedom Of Speech issue. To a degree.
However, their right to Free Speech was not infringed, because it’s posted and public for all the world to see. That wasn’t infringed.
However, consequences of actions is another matter. You can be an overall shitty human being by advocating that people’s words deserve to get them killed. But people are not at liberty to give you a public platform to prove you are a lunatic.
The owners have the right to no longer allow you to have that Freedom on their platform if they deem your views to be a menace to society.
People celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death have no home training. More importantly, they need Jesus Christ.
However, their right to Free Speech was not infringed, because it’s posted and public for all the world to see. That wasn’t infringed.
However, consequences of actions is another matter. You can be an overall shitty human being by advocating that people’s words deserve to get them killed. But people are not at liberty to give you a public platform to prove you are a lunatic.
The owners have the right to no longer allow you to have that Freedom on their platform if they deem your views to be a menace to society.
People celebrating Charlie Kirk’s death have no home training. More importantly, they need Jesus Christ.
Page 3 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News