- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Clarence Thomas Wants SCOTUS to 'Correct the Error' of Legal Gay Marriage
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:12 am
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:12 am
Oh hell yes, this absolutely needs to happen
I was always for legal partnerships that gave homosexuals the same rights (I.e. health Beni’s, inheritance Rights, hospital visits, SS Beni’s, etc)
but the definition of marriage should not be forced by the feds
Hopefully we go after men that want to pretend to be women so they can unfairly compete in athletics as well
LINK
I was always for legal partnerships that gave homosexuals the same rights (I.e. health Beni’s, inheritance Rights, hospital visits, SS Beni’s, etc)
but the definition of marriage should not be forced by the feds
Hopefully we go after men that want to pretend to be women so they can unfairly compete in athletics as well
LINK
quote:
Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas argued in a Friday opinion that the nation's top judicial body should overrule a previous decision legalizing LGBTQ marriage nationwide and a former ruling that determined criminalizing sodomy is unconstitutional.
33
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:15 am to dcbl
Redefining marriage was a travesty. The ship may have sailed, however.
Problem with the passive attitude is that is absolutely will not stop there. Polymarriage (and worse) is on the horizon.
Problem with the passive attitude is that is absolutely will not stop there. Polymarriage (and worse) is on the horizon.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:15 am to dcbl
I give precisely zero fricks about gay marriage one way or the other. I just want Federal overreach to stop and for these issues to go back to the states where they belong.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:19 am to dcbl
quote:
former ruling that determined criminalizing sodomy is unconstitutional
Gonna need to know more about this one. I assume it’s an additional charge on top of rape, which is weird that that got protected.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:19 am to dcbl
The gay marriage issue revolves around one thing and one thing alone - wether gay couples get to enjoy the same benefits of straight couples. Tax treatment and including spouse on health insurance.
Thats it, thats all this debate is about. No law can force your church to marry them. Its about wether or not the state recognizes it as a union. They’re going to cohabitate anyway, wether the union is recognized or not.
Thats it, thats all this debate is about. No law can force your church to marry them. Its about wether or not the state recognizes it as a union. They’re going to cohabitate anyway, wether the union is recognized or not.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:20 am to GoldenGuy
quote:
Gonna need to know more about this one. I assume it’s an additional charge on top of rape, which is weird that that got protected.
Some states have old laws on the books that make sodomy illegal, even if between consenting adults. I believe that is what its referring to. Louisiana is one of those states if memory serves correctly.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:21 am to LSUnation78
quote:
The gay marriage issue revolves around one thing and one thing alone - wether gay couples get to enjoy the same benefits of straight couples.
You can keep saying that; it doesn't make it true.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:21 am to dcbl
Meh. The government should have no say in what marriage to recognize. Marriage is religious.
If it centers around healthcare then modify healthcare laws. I see no reason why I cannot but health insurance for anyone I choose, relative or otherwise.
If it centers around healthcare then modify healthcare laws. I see no reason why I cannot but health insurance for anyone I choose, relative or otherwise.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:22 am to dcbl
Abortion and gay marriage huh. Some Republicans are the worst.
This post was edited on 6/27/22 at 9:23 am
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:24 am to dcbl
I’m very much a live and let live person but frick these wacko leftists and anyone who supports them. I’m to the point where if they are for it then it must be evil as frick.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:24 am to fjlee90
quote:
I see no reason why I cannot but health insurance for anyone I choose, relative or otherwise.
Some employers insure an entire family for a set price. In fact, mine is the same whether I have 1 kid or 12 kids. My employer won't let me put just anyone on the policy though.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:25 am to Tantal
quote:
I give precisely zero fricks about gay marriage one way or the other. I just want Federal overreach to stop and for these issues to go back to the states where they belong.
I'm pretty sure congress can pass federal laws legalizing abortion and gay marriage. The cowards are either too lazy and stupid to do so (See Obama Administration w/ 60 senate super majority of 111th Congress) or they want to preserve the narrative for making disingenuous arguments to the electorate (hint: it's the latter).
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:25 am to dcbl
Get the government out of the marriage business.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:25 am to dcbl
I think threatening the Supreme Court pissed Thomas off a bit. What else you got?
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:26 am to Tantal
quote:
I give precisely zero fricks about gay marriage one way or the other. I just want Federal overreach to stop and for these issues to go back to the states where they belong.
All of that.
The federal government doesn't need to be involved in any issue that touches the individual. Send it ALL back to the states.
If some retards want to marry animals and inanimate objects then they can lobby their state reps or run for a position in their state legislature and make their case.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:27 am to dcbl
Unfortunately, I can't provide a link, but I do recall in the aftermath of Obergefell that a leftist news outlet (probably The New Yorker) said that there can't be conscience protections for clergy who don't want to perform rainbow weddings, nor can there be such protections for wedding vendors, because that would make LGBT couples "unequal."
The militant left too far into forcing unwilling people into participating in their lifestyle ceremonies.
Hopefully the SCOTUS can do something to protect the rights of those who object to rainbow stuff for religious reasons (meaning Christians and not just Muslims).
The militant left too far into forcing unwilling people into participating in their lifestyle ceremonies.
Hopefully the SCOTUS can do something to protect the rights of those who object to rainbow stuff for religious reasons (meaning Christians and not just Muslims).
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:27 am to Ace Midnight
quote:
Polymarriage (and worse) is on the horizon.
Should this be defined at the state level as well?
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:28 am to fjlee90
quote:
Marriage is religious.
It should be, but it isn't.
As long as the State is involved in Marriages, under the Equal Protection Clause (among other things), there clearly needs to be an allowance for same sex Marriages. Its not even a question for me.
Now, if States get out of the marriage game all together, that's another ball game.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:29 am to rebelrouser
quote:
I'm pretty sure congress can pass federal laws legalizing abortion and gay marriage.
Which is bullshite. Neither of those have anything to do with defense, immigration, foreign treaties, or regulation of interstate commerce; therefore, they should be state issues. It's crazy how we have become so accustomed to abuse of the Commerce Clause that Republicans use it often too.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 9:29 am to GregMaddux
quote:
Abortion and gay marriage huh. Some Republicans are the worst.
I used to believe that Progressives were the angriest and intolerant group in America.
This Dobbs decision has me thinking that SoCons are giving them some competition.
Page 1 of 7
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News