- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Chief Justice Roberts votes against the new ballroom.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:42 am to hogcard1964
Posted on 9/1/26 at 7:42 am to hogcard1964
It's time to hold impeachment hearings against the chief justice.
Bush bull$hit doing work decades later.
Bush bull$hit doing work decades later.
0
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:00 am to Stat M Repairman
quote:this. As per usual Trump doesn't get shite done because every fricking movie move he makes gets litigated to hell and back. The clock is ticking on his 4 years
What percentage of political discourse this year been about this goddamn ballrom?
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:01 am to BFIV
He's right in that Congress has the authority.
But where he fails is in not acknowledging that Congress long ago abandoned that authority relying only on the funding mechanism to influence work on the White House grounds.
I see this as akin to Texas trying to secure their southern border when the Biden administration simply wouldn't. There needs to be a mechanism for the transfer of authority which varying parts of government have essentially abdicated.
quote:
Article IV
--Section 3 New States and Federal Property
----Clause 2 Territory and Other Property
The Congress shall have Power to dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States; and nothing in this Constitution shall be so construed as to Prejudice any Claims of the United States, or of any particular State.
But where he fails is in not acknowledging that Congress long ago abandoned that authority relying only on the funding mechanism to influence work on the White House grounds.
I see this as akin to Texas trying to secure their southern border when the Biden administration simply wouldn't. There needs to be a mechanism for the transfer of authority which varying parts of government have essentially abdicated.
This post was edited on 9/1/26 at 8:11 am
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:06 am to JellyRoll
quote:
Yawn
You must be a Gazillionaire as you are paying for it, and won't miss it.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:19 am to BFIV
Roberts argument is that the ballroom needs congressional approval, however Congress is not arguing to stop the construction. Congress has not brought lawsuit to stop the construction.
Using the dismissal of the 2020 election challenge on the basis of no standing, shouldn't these ballroom lawsuits be dismissed in the same no standing grounds. No government entity with oversight is challenging the ballroom.
Using the dismissal of the 2020 election challenge on the basis of no standing, shouldn't these ballroom lawsuits be dismissed in the same no standing grounds. No government entity with oversight is challenging the ballroom.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:21 am to Cheese Grits
It's not like he is throwing a swimming pool in to bang interns.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:33 am to Jbird
Epstein is dead, no more young women for DJT.
Say what you will, but Bill got the panties to drop for free. Not sure of the success of other POTUS but guessing past 55 and your "freshness" has expired. Imagine being a hot 21 year old - with all kinds of hot guys their age - having to bang Pelosi, Sleepy Joe, DJT, or The Turtle.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:33 am to MMauler
quote:I did an event for them years ago. They are super left wing.
the National Trust for Historic Preservation
Roberts is a neocon fraud, the perfect representative of the man who appointed him.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:44 am to Cheese Grits
quote:
Jackie has international class
Yea.
Onassis was as classy as the married diamond merchant she lived with.
Such class.
Posted on 9/1/26 at 8:59 am to BFIV
Some of us fiscal conservatives think this ballroom is just another example of runaway spending in the face of massive debt loads
Not buying the notion that it’s being paid for by corporate contributions. Even if it were, we don’t want our government being controlled by special interests that can manipulate our elected officials if we can avoid it.
If this were being done by a Obama or Biden or Clinton or any democrat, it’d be sky screaming from all of us but for some reason it’s perfectly acceptable if Trump does it. Some just like being gaslighted I guess…
Not buying the notion that it’s being paid for by corporate contributions. Even if it were, we don’t want our government being controlled by special interests that can manipulate our elected officials if we can avoid it.
If this were being done by a Obama or Biden or Clinton or any democrat, it’d be sky screaming from all of us but for some reason it’s perfectly acceptable if Trump does it. Some just like being gaslighted I guess…
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News